home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets expos directories catalogs resources advertise contacts
 
News Page

The news
and
beyond the news
Index of news sources
All Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Middle East North America
  Topics
  Species
Archives
News archive 1997-2008
 

Decision T 420/19 from the European Patent Office's Boards of Appeal on European patent EP2373154, concerning barley and malt-derived beverages with low dimethyl sulfide level


European Union
June 9, 2021

Source

European patent EP2373154 concerns barley and malt-derived beverages with low dimethyl sulfide level. In its decision announced at the end of the oral proceedings on 8 June 2021, Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04 upheld the patent as granted.

Background

The patent proprietors are Carlsberg Breweries A/S and Heineken Supply Chain B.V. The joint opponents are Christoph Then, Ruth Tippe, Arbeitsgemeinschaft bäuerliche Landwirtschaft, AG der Umweltbeauftragten in der EKD, Arche Noah, Bund Naturschutz, Brot für die Welt, Campact, Evangelischer Dienst auf Lande, Gen-ethisches Netzwerk, IG Nachbau, Noah, ProSpecieRara, Slow Food Deutschland, Umweltinstitut München and Verband Katholisches Landvolk. 

Both the patent proprietor and the opponents had filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office. The Opposition Division had decided that the patent could not be maintained as granted but only in amended form.

Key considerations

Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04 set aside the decision of the Opposition Division and maintained the patent as granted. 

The Board of Appeal followed the opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 3/19 ("Pepper") and, with regard to the patent claim directed to a mutant barley plant, came to the conclusion that the non‑patentability of essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals under Article 53(b) EPC did not exclude the patent claim under consideration from patentability, as the patent had already been granted before 1 July 2017. The Board of Appeal further decided that the subject-matter of the patent claim under consideration was based on an inventive step (Article 56 EPC) and was disclosed in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art (Article 83 EPC). 

The written decision will be sent to the parties in due course and will subsequently be publicly available in the decisions database of the Boards of Appeal.

 



More news from: European Union - European Patent Office


Website: http://www.epo.org

Published: June 9, 2021

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated
Fair use notice


Copyright @ 1992-2025 SeedQuest - All rights reserved