News section
home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets resources directories advertise contacts search site plan
 
.
Cotton Seed Distributors Web on Wednesday: Liberty Link

.

Australia
May, 2007

Cotton Seed Distributors article

A video version is available at http://www.csd.net.au/default.asp?file=/showwow.asp?wow=2394

Welcome to this weeks Web on Wednesday. In August 2006, Federal Regulators approved Liberty Link® cotton technology in Australia. Liberty Link® cotton is a new technology to Australian farmers which allows them to use Liberty herbicide for the over-the-top control of hard-to-kill perennial and annual weeds in cotton systems.
This week we will be talking to Mick Brosnan from B & W Rural in Mungindi and Sarah Wilson from Bayer CropScience in Goondiwindi about their experiences with Liberty Link® cotton.

The values of Liberty Link® cotton can be best summed up in four points:

  • The enhanced control of hard-to-kill weeds like peach vine,
  • control options for volunteer cotton including Roundup Ready® volunteers,
  • providing growers with an interesting option in terms of rotation choice in herbicide and technology for their production systems,
  • and importantly, this technology will help the industry to maintain its current weed resistant status.

Sarah Wilson, Bayer CropScience

I’m talking with Sarah Wilson from Bayer CropScience. Sarah has been involved in a lot of the research and development work with Liberty Link® cotton. Sarah, can you just tell us about the Liberty herbicide, how it works and what it looks like when it is sprayed?

The Liberty herbicide itself has the active ingredient glufosinate-ammonium. The way this herbicide works is that it causes a breakdown in one of the essential plant metabolism lines and it causes a build-up of ammonia within the plant which essentially leads to plant death. What you generally see after application is that within about five days you will start to see yellowing-off on the weeds. Plant death is probably (depending on climatic conditions) within anywhere from 15-20 days afterwards.

You have assembled a substantial list of the weeds it does control. Can you tell us what is going to be on that list?

Yes the weeds on the list at the moment are annual polymeria, bell vine, bladder kepmia, caltrop, conventional cotton and Roundup Ready® cotton (which obviously includes Bollgard® varieties), dwarf amaranth, European bind weed, paddy melon, peach vine, red pig weed, rhyncosia, sesbania, sow thistle, yellow vine and at the moment we also have a suppression claim for Chinese lantern, noogoora burr.

Over the next few years, we will continue to add weeds to the label and continue work so those suppression claims will probably be upgraded to control but it is just a matter of getting the field trials done to make the claim on the label.

Just from your experience with your trial work so far, is there any group of weeds that there may be a slight limitation on?

This product is (I would have to say) stronger on broadleaf weeds as opposed to grass weeds. So, while it does control some grass weeds in some instances, we have got no label claims at the moment and we are probably a lot more comfortable sitting with broadleaf weed control.

What sort of stewardship program or training will be required for growers that decide to use Liberty Link®?

There will be an accreditation program. We will be running those over the next couple of months. Basically the growers will be accredited on the use of the herbicide and the growth of the crop and the Technology Service Providers (TSP’s) will also have an accreditation process and then auditors will go through an accreditation process as well. That will all be a one day process where the growers will come in for a couple of hours and then if they want to stay for the audit process then they can; it will be another couple of hours on top of that.

Can you just give us a comment on the application windows for this product in terms of crop stage or time of the season?

Basically with this product, the cotton is completely tolerant to the herbicide so there is no limitation as far as the crop is concerned. The problem is withholding periods, so the application is up to 70 days before picking because of the withholding period. The important thing is that the application of the herbicide is based on weed size, not crop size, so we are targeting weeds at 2 – 6 leaf stage as opposed to looking at crop stage limitations.

If some growers next year wanted to try it this technology out, could you give some suggestions. Would it be good to pick out a bad field with vine for instance and try it out?

Yes definitely, fields where you have had traditionally had broadleaf problems or where you are looking to just clean it up after other cotton varieties (cotton volunteers). This year we had a grower put it into a brand new field (so it’s the first year in crop) just to tidy it up and get rid of some of the vines and things so that’s where he saw a real fit for it on his farm.

Michael Brosnan, B & W Rural, Mungindi

I am talking with Michael Brosnan from B & W Rural in Mungindi. Michael has had a couple of years experience with some of his clients using Liberty Link® technology. Michael can you just give us a summary of how you found the technology?

I found the Liberty Link® technology very good. As you said we have had two years now and we have basically found the product to be very good on all the broadleaf weeds.

Last season particularly, it was out as “Cleveland” (Mungindi) it was on some brand new country which we knew would be very dirty including some bad take-all (polymeria longifolia – the bad one) and we found it to be quite good on suppressing it, which was enough to let the cotton out-compete the polymeria and all the other broadleaf weeds. We had a pretty broad range of weeds and we were very happy with the result.

We put Stomp® down pre-plant because we were concerned that it isn’t a great product on grass but they did some trials where they left the Stomp® out and actually found it to be quite good on the grasses as well so in future years we might go back to a band of Stomp® at a lower rate.

You said they did some trials with the planting herbicides; they also did some trials with lay-by as well?

Yes they left some lay-by out and they were still very happy with the Liberty Link®. It suppressed the weeds enough, but I think you would have to assess it every year; season by season. Some years I think you would still need to put a lay-by down; other years (like last year) it looked like we probably would have got away without a lay-by.

What comments could you make on some of the specifics in terms of application of the Liberty product?

The main key (in which Bayer told us to do) is that coverage was the king and actually they were recommending up to 200 litres of water to the hectare and that’s what we did; we put 200 litres of water to the hectare out to get really good coverage and I think that is the key to the product. It is pretty hard to swallow when growers are use to putting out 50 up to a maximum of 100 litres of water to the hectare but I think that is the key to this product; water volume.

In a system where there are a range of weed control technologies available, how do you specifically see the Liberty Link® fitting into a farming system?

I think that one of the real benefits of this product will be as a rotation tool to combat the Roundup Ready® volunteers. The Roundup Ready® volunteers are a real issue, especially for the growers that water-up but also for the pre-waters it still becomes a problem there as well. So that’s where I see this as a really valuable tool, you have one season of Roundup Ready® and then follow it with a season of Liberty Link®. Obviously the technology is only in Sicot 80 conventional at the moment but we need it into the Sicot 71 line both (Bollgard® and conventional) eventually.

Just on the Sicot 80L; you have probably seen it as much as anyone has. What are your comments on that variety in terms of its management and performance?

Sicot 80 is a good variety, especially if water is a little bit limited. For this area the Sicot 71 line is absolutely exceptional if you have got full water and good soil (which most of this country is), but Sicot 80 is a very good performer and I think the Sicot 80L and Sicot 80 conventional are identical in terms of management; you wouldn’t manage them any differently I don’t believe.

Liberty Link® cotton is being developed in collaboration between CSD, CSIRO and Bayer CropScience. In 2007 we will have two Liberty cotton varieties available for growers to consider using.
They will be;
• Sicot 80L which is a variety suited to the warmer Northern and Western areas of the cotton belt
• Sicot 43L a variety which has got good opportunity in the Eastern and cooler areas.

We do have in development stacks of Liberty Link® Bollgard II and those varieties will be available to growers in subsequent seasons.

 

 

 

 

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated - Fair use notice

Other news from this source


Copyright © SeedQuest - All rights reserved