Twinn Falls, Idaho
January 31, 2007
For decades, Idaho's sugarbeet
growers have been rotating their crops with potatoes. Now, a
University of Idaho weed
scientist says they may be unintentionally growing as many as
211 sacks of potatoes while they're raising sugarbeets.
According to Don Morishita, so many small, leftover potatoes
from the previous year's harvest can sprout among the current
year's sugarbeets that sugarbeet root yields can be sliced by 25
to 61 percent. "It was really an eye-opener for me," Morishita
says. "I think what really makes the potatoes so competitive is
that they have a jump on the sugarbeets early in the season and
it's just hard for the beets to catch up after that.
"The sugarbeet roots and the potato tubers are competing for
underground space, and there's just a certain amount of space
that's available for them to grow."
Morishita decided to measure the potential impacts of volunteer
potatoes on sugarbeet crops back in 2005, after learning that
Washington State University scientists had found an average
9,985 leftover potato tubers per acre in fields they had
surveyed. At the University of Idaho's Kimberly Research and
Extension Center in 2005 and 2006, he deliberately planted
potatoes in seven different densities-between 2,728 and 16,336
plants per acre-mixed in with sugarbeets.
On average, in a 100-foot crop row, Morishita's research team
found 12 potatoes tucked inbetween sugarbeets in the plots
planted with the fewest potatoes and 69 potatoes in the plots
planted with the most, with resulting yield losses of 25 to 61
percent. Plots seeded with a roughly average amount of unwelcome
spuds-8,168 per acre-left 34 potatoes within sugarbeet rows at a
yield cost of 42 percent.
Currently registered sugarbeet herbicides have little effect on
volunteer potatoes, Morishita says. The intruder potatoes
produced tubers as large as 6 ounces-2 ounces more that it takes
for a spud to grade U.S. No. 1.
Morishita also found that the best time for hoeing out an
average number of weedy potatoes was when tubers were just
beginning to form underground-about a month after plant
emergence. Hoe before then and you'll soon be hoeing again, he
says: the stored energy in the tuber will send up a new potato
plant that's still capable of nipping sugarbeet yields. Hoe
later and the potatoes will already have begun to take an
unacceptable toll on the beet crop.
There are more reasons than simply eliminating competition to
remove volunteer potatoes from sugarbeet fields, Morishita
notes. They can host potato diseases, threatening neighboring
potato fields as well as future potato crops.
Morishita will repeat the timing-of-removal portion of his
"interference" study this year. |