Ottawa, Canada
August 7, 2006
USDA/FAS GAIN report CA 6032
Report Highlights
On August 1, 2006, the
Canadian Wheat Board (CWB)
released a proposal to the Canadian government, entitled "Harvesting
Opportunity", outlining potential reforms of the Board.
The CWB reforms include independence from the Canadian
government while keeping its monopsony, new electoral
powers, the ability to invest in physical assets, and C$1.5
from the Canadian federal government in lieu of federal
guarantees on farmers payments and CWB borrowings. The
reforms are unlikely to be enacted in the current political
climate since the Conservative government supports creating
a more open-market for wheat and barley growers and any
changes to the CWB's current operating mandate require
Parliamentary approval.
Executive Summary
On August 1, 2006, the Canadian
Wheat Board (CWB) released a proposal to the Canadian
government, entitled “Harvesting Opportunity”, into the debate
over the future of the Board and its single-desk position. If
enacted, the proposed reforms would create a stronger and
independent Board with a new internal electoral regime, a $1.5
billion capital base, a free hand to invest in physical assets
while retaining its single-desk position in the wheat and barley
market. The Board stated its reforms would create a non-profit,
“farmer owned”, single desk corporation with a wholly-owned
subsidiary to invest in the supply chain, valueadded industries
for agricultural products and financial services. CWB board
chair, Ken Ritter, stated, “it significantly advances farmers’
ability to control their own destiny…[and] takes advantage of
our competitive strengths.” A main feature of the proposal is
the $1.5 billion capitalization from the federal government
allowing it acquire physical assets and thereby become more
vertically integrated along the lines of private grain
companies. Such capitalization would also provide the CWB the
wherewithal to continue to borrow at reasonable rates to finance
its operations and a financing alternative should export credit
guarantees be further disciplined in the WTO. The Conservative
government was unmoved by the proposed reforms and continue to
voice its support for introducing a “dual market” system in the
wheat and barley industry.
Canadian Wheat Board’s Proposed
Reforms
“Harvesting Opportunity”, the
result of a year of research and outside consultancy, envisions
a CWB free of the 5 federally-appointed members of its board,
including the President and CEO. It puts a heavy emphasis on the
proposed new Board being entirely “farmer controlled” in
contrast to private agricultural companies, which it contends
does not have the welfare of the farmers at heart. The reformed
board of directors would include ten elected farmers, as it is
now, with four directors and the President appointed by the
board to preside over the world’s largest wheat and barley
marketer.
The reforms outlined in the
proposal would allow the CWB to own assets and partner with
other players in the international agriculture market. In
addition to gaining a free hand in partnering, “Harvesting
Opportunity” would see the federal government giving the Board
$1.5 billion in start-up capital to cover the cost of
guaranteeing farmers’ payments and for investment in value-added
industries, physical assets and financial services. Ritter
remarked that the proposal “creates farmer power in grain
handling and transportation and builds a realistic platform for
farmer investment and benefit in value-added activities on the
Prairies, in Canada and overseas.” The CWB has expressed
interest in vertical integration in the wheat and barley
industry in the past, but the Canadian Wheat Board Act does not
allow the CWB to own any physical assets, which the Board
believes puts them at a severe disadvantage to private
agricultural companies that own rail cars and grain elevators.
“Harvesting Opportunities”
reiterates and emphasizes this point, “For farmers to
successfully compete against large vertically-integrated
multinationals over the long-term, their involvement in other
aspects of the supply chain must be strengthened.” The proposal
points to rising supply chain costs as one of the causes of the
downward trend in farmer income, and, if enacted, these reforms
would correct this by allowing the organization to operate in
other segments of the supply chain. Primary grain handling and
elevation and grain handling and elevation at ports are listed
as potential investments by a CWB subsidiary company, “Business
Holding Ventures” (BHV). Other potential investments include
value-added processing, development of infrastructure and
financial and risk-management services for farmers.
According to a spring 2006 poll,
western Canadian farmers support the idea of the CWB expanding
its role into the supply chain. The results report that 73
percent of Western Canadian farmers support the idea of the
Board investing in storage or handling facilities in the
Prairies or Canadian ports.
Additionally, “Harvesting
Opportunities” outlines the creation of a new electoral
commission that would oversee the election of board members and
resolve disputes. It also proposes a new oversight committee to
ensure that the CWB does not operate in an anti-competitive
manner, abuse regulatory powers for competitive advantage and
engage in crosssubsidization between the CWB parent company and
the BHV. The committee would be
comprised of five members, four from the CWB’s board of
directors and one external member.
FAS Analyz`s
Although "Harvesting
Opportunities" was presented as a proposal to the Canadian
Government, it has met with opposition from the governing
Conservatives. Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl stated, upon
the release of "Harvesting Opportunities", that "our position
remains the same, we believe western grain farmers deserve the
freedom to make their own marketing and transportation
decisions...Western grain farmers should be able to participate
voluntarily in the Canadian Wheat Board." The Conservative
Party's consistent position on the CWB has been to introduce
dual marketing in the wheat and barley market. Indeed, it has
stated repeatedly that it plans to reform the CWB, thus
fulfilling a campaign promise dear to its free trade oriented
core Alberta base. To this end, the Agriculture Ministry has
recently held meeting with those CWB members who would like to
see a dual
marketing system in order to strategize on reforming the CWB
along those lines.
Both CWB Board of Directors' and
Conservative plans to reform the CWB appear to be unlikely in
the current political climate. Major CWB operating changes
require changes to the Canadian Wheat Board Act, which must be
approved by Parliament. Neither the Harper Government, which is
governing from a minority position, nor those parties which have
traditionally supported a single desk CWB, seem to be able to
command the majority
necessary to make the respective changes each side would like to
see -- whether it be introduction of dual marketing as
envisioned by the Conservatives or retention of the single desk,
the $1.5 capitalization fund, and the additional changes
outlined in "Harvesting Opportunities."
The CWB's proposal, "Harvesting
Opportunities" can be found at
http://www.cwb.ca/en/topics/choice/pdf/Harvesting_Opportunity_August_2006.pdf
|