California
August 1, 2006
Source: July-September 2006
California
Agriculture magazine
When
transgenes wander, should we worry?
Norman C. Ellstrand
Just like their traditionally bred
counterparts, transgenic crops have definitively been shown to
crossbreed with crops, weeds or native plants growing nearby.
In the July-September issue of the University of California's
California Agriculture journal, a peer-reviewed review
article documents widespread evidence that crop transgenes do,
in fact, wander in the environment.
But is this a cause for worry?
"The products of traditional plant improvement are not
absolutely safe, and we cannot expect transgenic crops to be
absolutely safe either," writes Norman C. Ellstrand, director of
the Biotechnology Impacts Center and genetics professor at UC
Riverside. "The creators of transgenic plants need to be as
mindful of possible problems with their products as they are of
potential promise."
With this issue,
California
Agriculture
launches a special series on the risks and benefits of
agricultural biotechnology. Three peer-reviewed research
articles focus on transgenic crops, fish and animals. (Future
issues will examine transgenic insects, pharmaceutical crops and
other concerns.) The full articles are posted online at
http://californiaagriculture.ucop.edu
Transgenic plants are engineered with genes from other plants or
organisms to express agronomically desirable traits, such as
herbicide or insect resistance, or higher vitamin levels. In
2005, the world's billionth acre of transgenic crops was
planted; most of that acreage was in the United States,
primarily in corn, soybeans and cotton.
Ellstrand, author of the 2003 book Dangerous Liaisons? When
Cultivated Plants Mate With Their Wild Relatives (Johns
Hopkins Press), has conducted extensive research on gene
transfer among plants, in addition to field studies.
For example, Ellstrand and colleagues showed that one of the
world's most important crops, sorghum, spontaneously hybridized
with one of the world's worst weeds, johnsongrass, even when
they were grown up to 330 feet apart; furthermore, the two
plants are distinct species with different numbers of
chromosomes. Other labs have demonstrated crop-to-wild gene flow
with sunflower, rice, canola and pearl millet.
Transgenic crops are no different. Transgenic canola has
crossbred with its native relative, creating herbicide-resistant
volunteers. A more well-known example is transgenic Starlink
corn, which was not approved for human consumption but appeared
in a variety of corn-based foods. "For a decade, more than a
dozen cases of transgenes and/or their products out-of-place
have been reported," Ellstrand notes in California
Agriculture.
In two other peer-reviewed articles in California
Agriculture, Alison L. Van Eenennaam, UC Davis animal
genomics and biotechnology specialist, examines environmental
and public-policy concerns related to transgenic fish and
mammals.
To date, just one transgenic fish has been approved for sale in
the United States, a red-fluorescent zebra danio for aquariums
(California has banned the fish). A growth-enhanced salmon is
currently under federal review. Risk factors associated with
transgenic fish include unintended release or escape, and
related ecosystem imbalances. For example, in one study
"fast-growing transgenic salmon were found to dominate feed
acquisition and exhibit strong agonistic and cannibalistic
behavior toward their [nontransgenic] cohorts when there were
inadequate feed resources," Van Eenennaam writes.
However, Van Eenennaam notes that "neither the risks nor the
benefits of transgenic fish are certain or universal." Rather,
they vary according to a variety of factors. "Regulators need to
apply a scientifically sound, risk-based framework to assess the
ecological risks involved with each transgene, species and
receiving ecosystem combination on a case-by-case basis."
No genetically engineered food animals have been approved for
global or U.S. sale, although numerous animal species have been
cloned (but not sold for food) and transgenic animals are
producing commercial, nonfood items such as spider silk (by
goats). Van Eenennaam notes that transgenic animals raise unique
ethical concerns due to "the special place that animals hold in
our society."
This concern is often at odds with the scientific process, which
"places a high value on controlled experiments as a way to
obtain understanding," Van Eenennaam writes. She urges
scientists to pursue effective and responsible communication
with all stakeholders, in order to "reach a consensus on the
acceptable levels of risk for specific products of animal
biotechnology, and to determine which set of values will
ultimately be applied to decide the acceptable uses of animal
biotechnology."
California Agriculture is the
University of California's peer-reviewed journal of research in
agricultural, human and natural resources. For a free
subscription, go to:
http://CaliforniaAgriculture.ucop.edu call (510) 987-0044 or
write to
calag@ucop.edu.
Photo credit: Howard Creech |