Cologne, Germany
November 17, 2005
Max Planck Gesellschaft
researchers in Cologne, Germany demonstrate that a multi-step
defence system underlies the durable resistance of plants to
fungal parasites.
Plants are exposed to many
different pathogens in the environment. Only a few of these
pathogens, however, are able to attack a species of plant and
"make it sick". If a particular pathogen is unable to attack a
plant, that means that the plant is resistant to it – in other
words, it cannot host the pathogen.
This durable type of immunity
of a plant to parasites is called nonhost resistance. Although,
in nature, nonhost resistance stops almost all parasite attacks,
it has been the subject of little research. Scientists from the
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne,
working with Volker Lipka, Jan Dittgen, and Paul Schulze-Lefert,
and in co-operation with colleagues from the Carnegie
Institution in the US, have uncovered the molecular components
of nonhost resistance and described this system of defence in
the current edition of the journal
Science (November 18,
2005). In their findings, they draw parallels between the immune
systems of plants and animals. This research could be central to
the development of new "green" fungicides.
The Max Planck researchers were
able to identify the gene known as PEN (penetration) as an
important component of nonhost resistance. They isolated
arabidopsis mutations, which are partially susceptible to
powdery mildews. If these genes are defective, or if the protein
they code is missing in the plant cells, the fungus can invade
the leaf epidermis cells more frequently. For that reason the
scientists looked particularly at the question of exactly which
function the PEN2 protein has in the defence against pathogens.
PEN2 is an enzyme located in
the membrane of what are called peroxisomes. These are spatially
separated cell compartments, in which metabolic reactions often
take place that would be dangerous for the organism at any place
other than inside the compartments. If a fungus tries to invade
a plant cell, the peroxisomes are led over to the entry site by
the attached PEN2 protein. One or more sugar molecules can be
separated from another cell component through the enzyme
activities of the PEN2 enzyme, a glycosyl hydrolase. The
substance released by it appears to have a fungicidal effect,
which kills the pathogen.
The researchers, on the other
hand, observed that when PEN2 is missing, the plants become more
susceptible not only to grass powdery mildew fungi but also
other pests – for example, the pathogens causing late potato
blight. PEN2 is therefore a basic component of the plant's
immune system with a broad range of effects.
However if PEN2 is missing, the
plant is not completely helpless against fungal diseases. There
is still another line of defence which they have to get through.
If PEN2 is missing, the plant takes a drastic step: the cell
dies together with its attacker, which protects the neighbouring
plant tissue from infection.
In this deadly line of defence,
very different proteins play a key role – particularly EDS1,
PAD4 and SAG101. They were already known to researchers in other
species of plants, which identify molecular traits only present
in parasites by using immune receptors both on the cell surface
and inside the cell. Only if this second mechanism also fails
can the originally non-virulent grass powdery mildew fungus
colonise the plant.
The Max Planck research has now
demonstrated that the nonhost resistance of plants develops out
of a defence system with at least two steps. These steps
determine whether a plant is susceptible to a disease or not.
The redundancy of the defence layers and the wide-ranging
effects of PEN2 explain why, in nature, nonhost resistance is a
durable and broadly effective defence mechanism. If a building
block is missing from one defence layer, its function will be
taken over by components of the next layer.
Until now, scientists had
assumed that nonhost resistance is based more on "passive"
mechanisms: for example, the structure of the cell wall,
poisonous substances on the surface of the plant, or a lack of
molecular entry sites for pathogens. But the researchers in
Cologne have now shown that active immune responses make a key
contribution to nonhost resistance – for example, the transport
of PEN2 to the place of infection.
In further studies, the
researchers hope to try to identify materials that are built up
via PEN2 at the place of infection. They surmise that these
materials could lead to the development of new kinds of "green
fungicide" with a broad range of effects in the fight against
plant diseases.
Stanford, California
Source:
The Carnegie
Institution
Genetic defenders
protect crops from fungal disease
Like waves of soldiers guarding a
castle gate, multiple genetic defenders cooperate to protect
plant cells against powdery mildew disease, according to a new
study. Powdery mildew is a common fungal infection in plants
that attacks more than 9,000 species, including many crops such
as barley and wheat, and horticultural plants such as roses and
cucumbers. The researchers, including Shauna Somerville and
Mónica Stein of the
Carnegie
Institution's Department of Plant Biology, are the
first to document how these defense genes team up in plants. The
discovery could help combat fungal parasites that devastate
crops and cost growers billions of dollars in pesticides every
year.
The study, published in the
November 18 issue of the journal
Science, describes powdery
mildew infection in the mustard relative Arabidopsis thaliana.
Each species of mildew is host-specific, meaning it can infect
some plant species, but not others. By disabling protective
genes in Arabidopsis, the researchers were able to infect the
plants with species of powdery mildew that normally attack peas
or barley, revealing much about how plants use genes to fight
infection.
 |
Arabidopsis plants inoculated with Erysiphe pisi
fungal spores are shown here. From left to right,
plants with no mutations (WT), a disabled PEN2 gene,
disabled PAD4 and SAG101 genes, and all three
disabled genes together are increasingly vulnerable
to the fungus. This last variant is the most
susceptible to infection; it allowed E pisi to
proliferate as well as it does on pea plants, its
normal host.
(Images printed with permission from the American
Association for the Advancement of Science, Science,
November 18, 2005, issue.) |
"Most plants are resistant to
the majority of pathogens they encounter, but the basis for this
resistance was unknown," Somerville said. "Identifying these
genes has provided us with the first insight into how plants
defend against multiple pathogens."
Once a powdery mildew infection
takes hold, it covers the plant with fuzzy splotches, while
sapping precious nutrients. At the cellular level, the fungal
spores invade healthy plant cells and form root-like feeding
structures called haustoria. The plant cell wall is the primary
barrier to this invasion and one of the defense genes described
in the current study, called PEN2, prevents the fungus from
penetrating cell walls in the first place.
If this first line of defense
breaks down, as it does in about 5 to 25 percent of normal
Arabidopsis plants (depending on the mildew species), a second
set of genes jumps into the fray. These genes, called EDS1,
PAD4, and SAG101, work together in a complex inside the cell,
and can signal infected cells to die. By sacrificing these
fallen cells, the defense genes can spare healthy ones from
infection.
Somerville, Stein, and
colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding in
Köln disabled the protective genes in Arabidopsis by introducing
mutations, one at a time and in various combinations. They
infected these mutants with one of two species of powdery
mildew: Blumeria graminis hordei, a species that attacks barley,
and Erysiphe pisi, one that thrives on the leaves and pods of
pea plants.
"Disabling just three genes
allowed the pea powdery mildew to reproduce as well on
Arabidopsis as it does on its normal host," Somerville remarked.
"Thus, the resistance barriers limiting the growth of
inappropriate pathogens are much less complex than expected,
relying on just a limited number of genes."
The EDS1, PAD4, and SAG101 gene
complex's ability to signal cell death is relatively well known
to scientists. However, very little is known about how PEN2
behaves in the cell. The current study demonstrates that the
PEN2 protein is a catabolic enzyme--a protein that breaks down
other molecules--though its specific target remains unknown.
The study expands on the
researchers' previous work with a gene called PEN1. As its name
suggests, PEN1 and PEN2 seem to share a common purpose. However,
they seem to act via different mechanisms, and PEN2 protects
against a wider range of fungal pathogens. For example,
Arabidopsis plants with a disabled PEN2 gene are also more
susceptible to Phytopthora infestans, the fungus responsible for
the notorious Irish Potato Famine of the mid-19th century.
"The resistance mechanisms
operating at the cell wall seem to be surprisingly simple,"
Somerville said. "This suggests it might be possible to reverse
engineer crops like wheat with Arabidopsis PEN genes to help
control powdery mildew and other destructive diseases, thus
minimizing the need for pesticides."
The Carnegie
Institution of Washington has been a pioneering force in
basic scientific research since 1902. It is a private, nonprofit
organization with six research departments throughout the U.S.
Carnegie scientists are leaders in plant biology, developmental
biology, astronomy, materials science, global ecology, and Earth
and planetary science. The Department of Plant Biology is
located at 260 Panama St., Stanford, CA 94305. |