First report of barley as host of a phytoplasma belonging to
group 16SrI, subgroup B, and ribosomal protein subgroup rpI-B in
Lithuania |
A
ProMED-mail post
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
March 16, 2005
Source: American Phytopathological Society, Plant Disease Notes
[edited]
First report of barley as host of a phytoplasma belonging to
group 16SrI, subgroup B, and ribosomal protein subgroup rpI-B in
Lithuania
L. Urbanaviciene and R. Jomantiene, Fitovirus Laboratory,
Institute of Botany, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania; and R. E.
Davis, Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural
Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705. Plant Dis. 89:339, 2005;
published on-line as DOI: 10.1094/PD-89-0339A. Accepted for
publication 2 Dec 2004.
Numerous diseased plants of barley (_Hordeum vulgaris_ L.)
exhibiting twisted, abnormally thin and yellowed awns, reduced
spikelets, and general stunting and yellowing were observed in
fields in the Vilnius and Kaisiadorys regions of Lithuania. The
possible association of a phytoplasma with the disease, termed
barley deformation (BaDef), was assessed using polymerase chain
reaction (PCR).
3 phytoplasma universal primer pairs (P1/P7, R16F2n/R16R2, and
rpF1/rpR1) (1,2,4) were employed to amplify ribosomal (r) RNA
gene (rDNA) and ribosomal protein (rp) gene sequences. Template
DNA extractions and PCR (direct and nested) were conducted as
previously described (4). Although DNA was amplified in PCRs
containing template extracted from diseased plants, no
amplification was observed in PCRs containing DNA from
symptomless plants sampled from the same fields.
The BaDef phytoplasma was identified and classified according to
Lee et al. (4) through restriction fragment length polymorphism
(RFLP) analysis of 1.2-kbp 16S rDNA amplified in the PCR primed
by primer pair R16F2n/R16R2 and analysis of the 1.2-kbp rp gene
sequences amplified in PCR primed by primer pair rpF1/rpR1. On
the basis of collective RFLP patterns of amplified 16S rDNA and
rp gene sequences,
the BaDef phytoplasma was classified as a member of group 16SrI
(group I, aster yellows phytoplasma group), subgroup B
(16SrI-B), and rp subgroup rpI-B.
Ribosomal protein subgroup B was distinguished from other rp
subgroups on the basis of the presence of a recognition site for
HpaII. The 1.8-kbp rDNA product of PCR primed by P1/P7 and the
1.2-kbp rpF1/rpR1 PCR product were cloned and sequenced, and the
sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession No. AY734453
for the BaDef 16S rDNA and Accession No. AY735448 for the BaDef
rp gene sequence.
Previously, only oat proliferation (OatP) phytoplasma, a member
of subgroup 16SrI-A, had been characterized in a cereal crop
(_Avena sativa_ L.) in Europe (3); BaDef is another phytoplasmal
disease threatening cereal crops in the region.
References:
(1) S. Deng and D. Hiruki. J. Microbiol. Methods 14:53, 1991.
(2) D. E. Gundersen and I. M. Lee. Phytopathol. Mediterr.
35:144, 1996.
(3) R. Jomantiene et al. Plant Dis. 86:443, 2002.
(4) I. M. Lee et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1153, 1998.
--
ProMED-mail
<promed@promedmail.org>
[Aster yellows (AY) is the most widespread plant disease among
those known to be caused by phytoplasmas. AY phytoplasmas are
associated with diseases in more than 100 plant species
worldwide, predominantly in herbaceous dicotyledonous plants. In
North America, AY diseases are attributed primarily to
phytoplasma strains belonging to subgroups 16SrI-A (termed
Eastern AY phytoplasma) and 16SrI-B (termed California AY or
Western AY phytoplasma) in the AY group (16SrI). Both 16SrI-A
and 16SrI-B phytoplasmas are transmitted by a variety of
polyphagous leafhopper species and have a wide range of plant
hosts. On the basis of RFLP patterns of the 16S rDNA, the OatP
phytoplasma was classified as a member of group 16SrI (group I,
aster yellows phytoplasma group). The RFLP patterns of the 16S
rDNA were indistinguishable from those of 16S rDNA from tomato
big bud (BB) phytoplasma and other phytoplasmas classified in
group I, subgroup A (subgroup I-A, tomato big bud phytoplasma
subgroup). Disease management depends upon the crop involved.
Monitoring of leafhoppers and early detection of AY yellows
symptoms are important for those crops in which hand-removal of
diseased plants is feasible. For field crops, there are very few
management options available. Crop rotation will not reduce
aster yellows, because it is not a soil-borne disease, and most
crops are susceptible to the phytoplasma. There are no
fungicides available to control aster yellows. I rather doubt
that there are varieties that possess resistance to the AY
phytoplasma.
Links:
<http://www.apsnet.org/phyto/abstract/2003/pno03ab.htm>
<http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/DOCS/crops/integrated_pest_management/disease/asteryellows01.asp>
- Mod.DH] |
|
|