Australia
July 7, 2005 The
performance of Sicot 71BR in the past 2 seasons has been
incredible across most growing regions. The CSD Extension and
Development Team outlines the results of this variety in
replicated trials, commercial crops, as well as some detailed
analysis of crop where it has yielded exceptionally.
Adam
Kay
As you can see, Cotton Seed Distributors backs up the varieties
it sells with full and rigorous trial information. The Sicot
71BR Bollgard® Roundup Ready® is being no exception. We have
shown you that it can produce exceptional yields and this is
demonstrated by winning 32 of the 41 fully replicated large
scale trials it has been entered in over the last two seasons.
In surveys conducted of commercial fields, it has averaged over
11 bales to the hectare, 4½ bales per acre. A phenomenal yield,
and in trials it has averaged over 10 bales to the hectare, 4
bales to the acre. Again demonstrating the exceptional yield
potential. The fibre quality of this variety is also good.
Staple length is slightly shorter than Sicot 289BR and Sicala
60BR but in over 80% of the trials, it has achieved a length of
greater than 36, and in over 82% of the commercial fields the
length has been 36 or greater. I am sure this information will
be used by you to produce the best results you can with this
elite variety in the coming season.
We
are here with Rob Eveleigh (left) of CSD. Rob can you just give
us a rundown of how 71BR has performed in the variety trials
this season.
Sicot 71BR has probably been the most outstanding
variety that CSD has ever released. We will go through some of
the trial results in a minute but basically it has performed
well from Emerald in the trials up there right through to the
southern trials in the Riverina. We have never had a variety
that’s had that sort of adaptability and performance over such a
wide area.
Rob would you mind just elaborating more on these
trial results, how has it actually gone?
We have had 71BR now in 41 trials over 2 seasons,
as I said before, spread over the whole industry and over that
time it has finished first in about 32 of those trials, so its
won the trial on 32 occasions out of 41 and on another 6
occasions its come second and third on one occasion. So that’s a
pretty outstanding performance. The other thing that is
outstanding about it has been the actual average yield over all
those trials, all those locations, it has an average yield of
over 4 bales per acre.
Rob can you give us a rundown on how Sicot 71BR
has performed in regards to fibre quality?
Fibre quality is obviously a very important
factor in selection of varieties and certainly Sicot 71BR is
shorter than some of the other varieties that we sell, such as
Sicala 60BR and Sicot 289BR, but nevertheless the stats would
suggest that its going to make the present base grade which is
35 length on at least 95% of occasions. So in 95% of our trials
it made that 35 length or better and in fact it made 36 length
on at least 80% of trials so in 8 out of every 10 trials its
made 36 length or greater.
Rob, you just mentioned that Sicot 71BR didn’t
make base grade in a couple of occasions, could you elaborate a
little bit further why this was the case?
On a couple of occasions it didn’t make 35 length
and those two trials were actually 2 trials in the Riverina and
in fact nearly all the varieties included in the trials were
short and the 71BR was slightly short in those trials as well
and that’s largely due to stress and that stress was probably a
combination of things. Certainly they had some very low
temperatures during the time when fibre length would have been
determined in the Riverina and they also at one site there may
have also been some moisture stress associated with that. So you
can explain the situations where it hasn’t made base. In any of
the trials where there has been plenty of water and more normal
growing conditions there has been no problem with fibre length.
In terms of micronaire, how has it performed?
Micronaire is another category and generally
there have been no problems with micronaire. In the micronaire
stakes it’s never exceeded 4.9 in micronaire in any of the
trials which is pretty good because there have been some sites
with reasonably high micronaire. Its been in the sweet spot for
micronaire on about 50% of occasions so its in that 3.8 – 4.5
range in a bit over 50% of occasions but you will find that
relates quite well or as much the same as the other Bollgard II®
varieties that are normally grown.
Rob, how can growers get their hands on these
trial results?
We have made the trial results very easy to get
hold of by anyone, basically at the moment all of the trial
results are on the CSD web site that’s csd.net.au and you can
follow the links to the variety trial results. They are all up
there now with all the details. The other way obviously in the
next few weeks you will receive the CSD trial results booklet
which will be direct mailed to everyone. If you don’t get a copy
of that or you are having difficulty you can certainly contact
any of the CSD Extension personnel and we will be able to run
through the trial results for you.
James
(Quinn), CSD sent out a very extensive survey to growers that
received the Sicot 71BR this past season. Can you outline some
of the responses to that survey?
We received 95 replies back which represent a
round about a 45% return which we are very very pleased with. We
estimate that that survey represented around about 5000 hectares
of the crop grown throughout the Australian cotton industry last
year. So although this is only preliminary data, we have great
confidence in the results that it has actually shown at the
moment. Growers were asked to also compare a similar variety,
just to gauge the performance of 71BR against this variety and I
would really like to thank those growers that took the time to
reply. This information has been very valuable.
James, can you go through a little bit more
detail on some of the findings of the survey?
Yes,
as I just mentioned, it is only preliminary data but we will
just highlight some of the things that it has been showing. We
have had some excellent yields across all valleys this season
and Sicot 71BR was a major part of these high yields.
In the 69 commercial crops that we have had they
have yielded it on average roundabout 11.11 bales/ha or pretty
much 4.5 bales/ac and which is really pleasing to us is the fact
that the Sicot 71BR has out performed any comparison variety by
far, up to about 20% in some cases.
It has really performed very well. In each
valley, it has averaged over 4 bales except for the Balonne.
I suppose that special mention must be made to
the Gwydir and the Namoi Valleys that have really shown some
very excellent yields in this variety which their average was
roundabout 4.7 bales an acre which is roundabout 11.7 bales per
hectare which is quite good. When we were looking at the
individual fields on a yield by yield basis about 50% of the
surveys returned went above 4 bales an acre. About 25% went, and
we had one crop that achieved an excellent result in the 6 bales
an acre.
James
that’s good about the yields, there has been some fantastic
yields there but what about quality, did the survey give any
information on the quality of Sicot 71BR?
Yes there have been a few questions throughout
the industry in regards to the quality of the 71BR this season,
but what we found in the 68 commercial crops that we had the
data for at the moment, 95% came back with a very good
micronaire, between 3.5 to 4.9. 98% of crops went 28 grams per
tex or more and all crops went above 35 in length with 82% of
those crops going 36 or better which is very pleasing.
James a lot of growers ask the question about
what variety is best to grow in back to back fields and there
will be quite a few fields this coming season that will be
planted back to back. Can you make some comments about how Sicot
71BR has performed in those back to back fields?
We
have seen some exceptional yields in the fallow situation and
that’s where most of these high yielding ones have been coming
from. It has been surprising to see the performance of the Sicot
71BR in the back to back situation.
When comparing between the fallow and the back to
back it’s about a bale behind as you can see in this figure.
But the interesting thing is that in a back to
back situation that the Sicot 71BR outperformed all other
varieties that it was compared to. This figure here is showing
Sicot 289BR and DP 556BGII/RR grown on similar farms and similar
management.
You can see here that the 289BR is about ½ a bale
behind the 71BR and the 556 is about a bale behind the 71BR.
So irrespective of whether you are growing fallow
or back to back, Sicot 71 is still going to give you the highest
yield?
Yes, that’s definitely the case.
James also on a similar vein, would you like to
make some comments about fibre quality of Sicot 71BR in fallow
and back to back situations?
Yes, we did some differences in regard but with
micronaire and the strength we didn’t find a difference at all
but in the length situation, the fallow blocks had about 132nd
length increase over the back to back situation.
James would you like to make any further comments
about the Survey and its findings so far?
It has been interesting to have a look and to see
how this crop has performed in commercial situations but what
has really been a highlight is in a commercial situation it’s
really new to what we are actually seeing in our trials and that
gives us great confidence in our trial program.
 David
(Kelly), there was some absolutely exceptional yields achieved
this year and Sicot 71BR featured in a lot of those yields. The
CSD Extension and Development team have done quite a bit of work
trying to work out where these yields came from, would you like
to explain how we went about investigating the yields of these
crops.
Rob, in 30 crops last year at picking time we
went out and in those crops we selected a number of metres of
row within the crops to try and get a good representative sample
of the fields we were in and in then we divided the bolls from
those crops up into eight different segments.
We
have divided the main stems of the plants up into lots of four
fruiting nodes and we kept separate the first position and also
the second and third position and also the vegetative nodes. So
we had for each plant bolls from eight different sections of the
plant.
We picked these bolls into our, what we called
our boll box and when we did this we were able to count the
number of bolls that were going into the box, we kept the
samples and we ginned them with the 10-saw gin so we were able
to get yield from those samples and we also got them HVI tested
so we had quality from those samples and when we played around
with that data we were able to generate information such as what
we are looking at now which is a crop of high yielding 71BR
grown on the Darling Downs. We can look at that crop and see
that about a bale per hectare of that crop came from the
vegetative nodes. We also find that most of the yield in that
particular crop came from right at the centre of the plant
between nodes 1 to 12 there is about 9 bales a hectare in there.
So you can really get a good picture of how these crops look.
Dave,
you must have seen some pretty interesting comparisons and
differences between crops. Can you tell us a little bit about
that?
Yes we were able to draw some really good
comparisons between how different varieties grew in the same
situation and we were also able to look at some of the
exceptional yielding crops that we saw across the industry last
year and try and work our where the good yield was coming from.
Dave can you tell us a bit about some of the
comparisons that you have actually made?
Well in three of our replicated variety trials in
the Border Rivers last year that included Sicot 71BR and Sicot
289BR we did the segmented picking so we had side by side result
from a number of trials.
If
you look at the yield result from this comparison, we found that
both of the yields were exceptional, over 10 bales per hectare
or 4 bales and acre, but the Sicot 71BR was about 5% higher
yield than the 289BR which is about the same as the 28
replicated trials that we have done that included both of those
variety sites, a pretty good difference.
If we look at the number of bolls per metre, the
numbers are actually very similar but the big difference is the
Sicot 71BR has boll weight of about 6% higher than the 289BR and
its just a factor of Sicot 71BR, its got big heavy bolls which
is why a lot of people were dragging great yields off crops that
didn’t look particularly showy last year.
Another interesting comparison between these two
varieties is the fibre quality.
If you look at the strength and micronaire they
are both pretty much the same but there was a slight difference
in fibre length.
Now
if you look at the fibre length there, both of them are well and
truly above base grade but the Sicot 289BR is about .02 of an
inch longer than the Sicot 71BR and again if you look through
the average of the 28 trials that we have done with both those
varieties in it, that’s the sort of trend that you get and its
just a simple fact that Sicot 289BR is a longer variety than
Sicot 71BR and in situations where water is limiting you have
probably got a little bit less room to move with Sicot 71BR than
289BR but as we heard before, in 80% of our trials and 80% of
commercial fields it made 36 and above and in many situations
its made 37’s and 38’s.
Looking at the yields of these two comparisons,
we have a 57% higher yield in the higher yielding crops. In the
areas we handpicked in these crops we got about 15.5 bales per
hectare. In reality these fields averaged close to about 13 ½
bales a hectare so we obviously went into some of the better
parts of the field but we still had a pretty good contrast.
Looking
at why there was such a difference, the high yielding crops had
bolls that were about 5% heavier but it also had 43% more bolls
than the lower yielding crops and that’s 43 bolls a metre and
this number in boll numbers is really reflected in a big
difference in the first position retention.
If you look at where both comparisons put their
bolls on, you can see the number of vegetative branches is
similar in both. The number of bolls at the very top of the
plant is very similar in both meaning that they didn’t have to
grow an enormous plant to achieve these yields. The area where
there is such a big difference is the first position bolls
between fruiting branches 1 to 12.
The high yielding crops have about 85 bolls per
metre in this section while the lower yielding crops have about
45 bolls per metre. This big difference probably can’t really be
fully explained by insects because the number of bolls on the
vegetative and the top of the plant are still very similar.
It
just means that these crops were probably grown in a near stress
free environment where a good climate, good soil conditions,
good everything to be able to maintain the high retention in the
middle of the crop as well as putting on some of the later fruit
as well.
Dave you have looked at those very high yielding
crops this year and doing a lot of work actually pulling those
crops apart, can you make, a few concluding comments about the
work and how growers might be able to manage crops to achieve
those fantastic yields again?
Well
the big difference was having good boll size, plenty of lint per
boll which comes back to variety a lot but also comes down to
management, season long but also getting a lot of boll numbers
and it really comes back to trying to push a crop along to be
able to put on a lot of potential squares which turn into bolls
but also being able to manage that crop so it holds onto a lot
of those bolls as well and again that comes down to more than
insects, its all round crop management having a crop that’s
healthy enough to be able to sustain a big boll load.
But this data has really shown the enormous
potential of Sicot 71BR even at moderate boll counts what we saw
about 110 bolls per metre people are still achieving good yields
around 4 bales an acre or 10 bales a hectare but if you can
bolster those boll numbers up to 140-160 bolls per metre you can
achieve a pretty high end in the yield perspective.
Further Information:
Dr
Stephen Allen,
Robert Eveleigh, John
Marshall,
Craig
McDonald,
David
Kelly or
James
Quinn
|