August 31, 2005
John Marshall, Cotton Seed
Distributors Extension & Development agronomist - Dalby,
outlines the plant population trials he has been conducting with
both irrigated and dryland Bollgard II® varieties during the
past six seasons.
John,
what were your findings with the irrigated trials this year?
This is
the sixth season we’ve conducted trials in irrigated, initially
with INGARD® and then Bollgard II® varieties. This year the
trend was fairly similar to what we’ve seen over the last couple
of years.
The
trial this year was conducted in a Bollgard field just outside
Dalby, on a farm that we’ve conducted trials for six years now.
The variety in the trial was Sicot 71BR, which yielded close to
4½ bales/acre, and across the population range there was very
little yield difference at all.
As in
previous years, the trial was conducted as a small plot trial,
six replications of each treatment and picked with a trial
picker, hand ginned and fibre quality done. The trend was very
similar to what we’ve seen in previous years, with not much
difference in yield across the range we looked at. The range we
looked at was from 7 plants/m through to 17 plants/m.
You
carried out segmented picking in this trial, across some of the
different plant populations. Can you give us some idea on what
sort of morphological differences where evident across of the
range?
We
looked at the two ends of the trial to some extent with the
segmented picking.
We
looked at 7 plant/m versus 15 plants/m, and we’d say the
retention was down a little bit in the higher plant population.
It had
slightly more bolls per metre but they were a little bit smaller
in size, about an average of 10% lower in weight.
The
boll numbers per plant varied a bit, in the lower population
they were in the range of 11-22 bolls/plant, whereas there was a
range from 2-18 bolls/plant in the higher population.
There
was quite a noticeable difference in the fruit forming pattern
between the two populations.
Obviously
different looking plants, but were there any differences in
fibre quality apparent across the plant population ranges?
No,
that’s the interesting thing.
We’ve
seen the same thing all years across the full range from 7
through to 17 - there has been basically no difference at all in
fibre quality, in micronaire, length or strength.
The
only thing there may have been a slight, trend towards was in
micronaire - it may have been a little bit lower in the lower
part of the plant in the denser plant stands.
However, there was no real difference there.
Based on this
year’s work and obviously previous years’ works, what are your
recommendations for planting rate with irrigated Bollgard II?
Recommendation
for irrigated
- Based
on av. estn. of 75%, seeding rate of 14-15 plants/m
will give stand of 11 plants/m
- Under
perfect conditions (90% estn), 13 plants/m
-
Under difficult
conditions (55% estn), 8 plants/m
|
Combining this year’s data with previous years, we’d still stay
with the same story we’ve put out for the last couple of years.
The aim
should be to drop 14-15 seeds/m to achieve a stand of about 11
plants/m, - that’s with an average establishment of 75%, which
is close to what most growers are achieving. In a situation
where growers might be watering-up later in the season, this
establishment percentage most likely would be higher and the
seeding rate could come back a bit.
The
idea is if things go against you and establishment drops right
off and we’ve seen scenarios where establishment has dropped to
55%, you’re still achieving 8 plants/m. If you strike extremely
good, conditions we’ve not seen any indication of a loss in
yield or fibre quality by higher stands.
What has been the
outcome to the plant population trial with the dryland this year
and over the last couple of seasons?
We’ve
carried out dryland plant population work for the last two
seasons with Bollgard. As compared with the irrigated situation,
from what we’ve seen from the last two years, our recommendation
for plant stand wouldn’t be very much different from that for
conventional. We’ve been looking at the range from 3-11 plants/m
established, and across that we’ve not seen any significant
difference in yield, although there’s probably been a slight
trend towards a slightly improved yield towards the higher end.
So based on what’ve seen in those two years, our recommendation
would be aim to establish somewhere in the order of 6-8 plants/m
in skip row configurations and maybe slightly lower in a solid
plant. That trial work quiet surprisingly has shown no
difference in fibre quality across that full range, right
through from 3 to 11 plants/m. Length, strength and micronaire
have been the same across the range in both years of trialling.
Further Information: John
Marshall |