Australia
October 20, 2004
Cotton Seed Distributors
- Web on Wednesday
Prof.
Rick Roush - University of
California, Davis Campus - Discusses the potential of
Glyphosate resistance in the cotton industry.
Rick, the possibility of Glyphosate resistance, we
have populations of annual rye grass in southern Australia, what
are the key areas of concern there?
It was always thought that
resistance couldn’t evolve at all to glyphosate let us say
Roundup® and related products. What we have realized since is
that it is very hard for weeds to evolve resistance to
glyphosate but not impossible.
So
then on a steady exposure to glyphosate alone as a primary
control tactic for fifteen or twenty years you can get
resistance, we have seen it with a weed in Malaysia, with annual
rye grass in California, with annual rye grass in Southern
Australia and in particular a wide spread weed in soybean
growing areas in the United States, Conyza. So if you hammer the
populations year after year you can get resistance and
particular in the case of Conyza it was a case where the weed
was probably not very sensitive to roundup anyhow.
The very modest levels of resistance that we get in roundup
resistance plants the very modest levels of resistance we get
are enough that actually start to make these weeds problematic
for control. It is not a big deal with most kinds of herbicides
like Triazenes or ALS inhibiting herbicides you get resistance
and you can’t control the weeds at all. Glyphosate is not like
that the levels of resistance are quiet low so it is one of
those things that really become a problem but not a crisis.
What
I wanted to try and argue today is that with relatively little
effort people could stay on top of this problem and prevent it
from ever getting there, and I should add its really something
that probably you know what some one does on their individual
farm, in contrast to heliothis which will move all over the
place, if you don’t manage weeds properly the weed problems and
resistance problems are going to be your own.
It is really up to the individual to do this. The kind of things
that people are encouraging like staying on top of the weed
problems if there are very many survivors going out and doing
something about it those are the important. Certainly what we
have found in Adelaide is that there seems to be very high
fitness costs that if you just don’t use roundup year after year
the chances of resistance evolving are much lower.
For a lot of weeds in cotton and other crops rotating herbicide
practices are a good idea because some weeds are intrinsically
less susceptible to roundup any how so just from the stand point
of trying to avoid weed spectrum shifts, it would be a good
thing to keep switching things. So the motto in herbicide
resistance with all due respect to John Laws is when on a good
thing don’t stick to it - keep shifting ground on the weeds,
rogue them out, change the herbicide practice every now and then
just to keep them off balance and we can forestall this problem
so it never really becomes an issue.
And tillage
would become an important part of that process?
Tillage can definitely be an
important part of the control process because you can control at
least some of the surviving weeds that might have appeared in
the rows after treatment. So tillage is important and any kind
of control tactic that helps keep the weed densities under
control can be very useful.
Further Information: Robert
Eveleigh, John
Marshall,
Craig McDonald or
David Kelly |