Winnipeg, manitoba
May 21, 2004
Monsanto Canada today welcomed the decision of the Supreme
Court of Canada in ruling that the subject
matter claimed within its patent for Roundup Ready(R) canola
falls within the Patent Act and that Mr. Percy Schmeiser and
Schmeiser Enterprises Ltd. of Bruno, Saskatchewan infringed that
patent.
"We are gratified the Supreme Court of Canada found that
Monsanto's patent pertaining to the Roundup Ready gene is valid
and enforceable," said Carl Casale, executive vice-president,
Monsanto Company. "The Supreme Court has set a world standard in
intellectual property protection and this ruling maintains
Canada as an attractive investment opportunity. Patent
protection encourages innovations that will lead to the next
generation of value-added products for Canadian farmers."
Monsanto originally pursued this case in the Federal Court of
Canada because Mr. Schmeiser knowingly infringed Monsanto's
patents on Roundup Ready technology by planting 1,030 acres of
Roundup Ready canola without paying the required license fee for
using the technology. After reviewing all the evidence, Justice
Andrew MacKay of the Federal Court of Canada did not find Mr.
Schmeiser's explanation of the events credible and held him
liable for infringing Monsanto's patent.
"More than 30,000 Canadian farmers have chosen our technology
because of the economic and environmental benefits it brings,"
said Casale. "We believe the Supreme Court of Canada decision is
good news for farmers and Canadians, all of who benefit from the
innovative work that is going on across the country to produce
more abundant, high quality food."
As a result of his infringement, Mr. Schmeiser will be required
to comply with several remedies awarded by the Courts,
including: (1) an injunction against Mr. Schmeiser and employees
of Schmeiser Enterprises that prohibits planting, growing,
cultivating, harvesting, selling, marketing or distributing the
patented technology in the future; (2) an order to deliver to
Monsanto any seed in Mr. Schmeiser's possession known to contain
the Roundup Ready gene. However, the Supreme Court determined
there was insufficient evidence that Mr. Schmeiser intentionally
made use of the benefits provided by Monsanto's technology by
spraying his crop with Roundup. Therefore, the Court has decided
that both sides will be responsible for absorbing their own
costs.
The Supreme Court of Canada decision exhausts all legal avenues
available to Mr. Schmeiser as it relates to the March 29, 2001
judgment rendered by Justice Andrew MacKay of the Federal Court
of Canada.
Monsanto Canada, based in Winnipeg, Manitoba, is a leading
provider of technology-based solutions and agricultural products
that improve productivity.
RELEASE from the SUPREME COURT
OF CANADASUPREME
COURT OF CANADA -- JUDGMENT IN APPEAL
OTTAWA, 21/05/04. THE SUPREME
COURT OF CANADA HAS TODAY DEPOSITED WITH THE REGISTRAR
JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPEAL.
FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(613) 995-4330
COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA --
JUGEMENT SUR APPEL
OTTAWA, 21/05/04. LA COUR
SUPRÊME DU CANADA A DÉPOSÉ AUJOURD'HUI AUPRÈS DE LA
REGISTRAIRE LE JUGEMENT DANS L'APPEL SUIVANT.
SOURCE: COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA
(613) 995-4330
29437 Percy
Schmeiser and Schmeiser Enterprises Ltd. v. Monsanto
Canada Inc. and Monsanto Company - and - Attorney
General of Ontario, Canadian Canola Growers Association
(CCGA), Ag-West Biotech Inc., BIOTECanada, Canadian Seed
Trade Association, Council of Canadians, Action Group on
Erosion, Technology and Concentration, Sierra Club of
Canada, National Farmers Union, Research Foundation for
Science, Technology and Ecology, and International
Centre for Technology Assessment (F.C.) 2004 SCC
34 / 2004 CSC 34 |
Coram: McLachlin
C.J. and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour,
LeBel, Deschamps and Fish JJ. |
The appeal from the judgment
of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-367-01, dated
September 4, 2002, heard on January 20, 2004 is allowed in
part, Iacobucci, Bastarache, Arbour and LeBel JJ.,
dissenting in part. The award for account of profit is set
aside and, in all other respects, the trial judge's order is
confirmed. Each party is to bear its own costs throughout.
L'appel interjeté contre l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel fédérale,
numéro A-367-01, en date du 4 septembre 2002, entendu le 20
janvier 2004 est accueilli en partie. Les juges Iacobucci,
Bastarache, Arbour et LeBel sont dissidents en partie. La
remise des profits ordonnée est annulée et, à tous autres
égards, la validité de l'ordonnance du juge de première
instance est confirmée. Chaque partie assumera ses propres
dépens dans toutes les cours.
Complete document:
Monsanto
Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser
|