Potato spindle tuber viroid in tomatoes in commercial production in New South Wales, Australia

A ProMED-mail post
ProMED-mail is a program of the International Society for Infectious Diseases

June 19, 2003
Source: DL Hailstones <deborah.hailstones@agric.nsw.gov.au >

Surveys of greenhouse grown tomato plants in New South Wales (NSW) have recently been finalised, with about 500 000 greenhouse tomato plants on 15 properties being surveyed over the past 12 months. No evidence of PSTVd symptoms were observed. PSTVd was detected in 2 plants on one farm in 2001, and that farm has been inspected approximately every month since that time, with no evidence of disease symptoms in successive crops. Eradication of the pathogen from that farm (and from the state) therefore appears to have been successful and NSW is still considered to be free of PSTVd.

[I am indebted to Deb Hailstones (molecular biologist, Plant Protection, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Agriculture) for providing this information. Continued vigilance will be required to maintain freedom from the viroid. Kudos to staff in NSW Agriculture for a job well done! - Mod.DH]


June 17, 2003
Source: Australasian Plant Pathology, Disease Notes, Vol 2, 2003 [edited]


Detection and eradication of potato spindle tuber viroid in tomatoes in commercial production in New South Wales, Australia

DL Hailstones <deborah.hailstones@agric.nsw.gov.au>, LA Tesoriero, MA Terras, C Dephoff, NSW Agriculture, Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology Journal 2003; 32(2): 317-8.

Australia is currently free of potato spindle tuber pospoviroid (PSTVd), which causes serious yield reductions in infected potatoes and tomatoes. Outbreaks in potato breeding programs in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW) in 1982 were managed by eradication (1). PSTVd was also detected and eradicated in breeding tomatoes in the Northern Territory (2) and more recently was detected in greenhouse-grown tomatoes in New Zealand (3). In Western Australia (WA) the pathogen was detected and subsequently eradicated from the affected property (4).

Given that PSTVd can be transmitted via seed and pollen (5), a national strategy was initiated to determine the extent of the PSTVd infection. In June 2001, about 100 000 greenhouse-grown tomato plants were surveyed on 15 properties in Western Sydney, NSW. Symptoms associated with PSTVd infection were observed on 2 plants of tomato (_Lycopersicon esculentum_, cultivar La Belle, from a single property.

These plants were removed and their PSTVd status evaluated by 3 methods. Sap from 1 plant was inoculated onto cotyledons of 6 seedlings of tomato cv. Grosse Lisse (6). Uninoculated plants were maintained as controls. Twisted and bunched shoot symptoms typical of PSTVd infection were visible
after 19 days. These plants tested positive for the presence of PSTVd in molecular tests. Leaf lysates were prepared from 1 of the symptomatic greenhouse-grown plants and extracted viroids were analysed using sequential PAGE (7).

Total nucleic acids were separated by size on a native 5 per cent polyacrylamide gel, stained with EtBr and the "viroid band" excised and applied to a denaturing 5 per cent polyacrylamide gel (containing 8 M
urea). Viroids in the second dimension gels were visualised by silver staining and compared in size with Citrus exocortis viroid (CEV, genome size 378 bp).

Extracts from symptomatic (PSTVd-infected) plants displayed a single band at a size smaller than CEV, consistent with the size expected for PSTVd. No viroid band was found in non-infected tomato plants. Identity of the viroid as PSTVd was confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) of total nucleic acids from the 2 symptomatic plants identified in the original survey, the 6 inoculated bioassay plants and 4 other potentially symptomatic plants, using a One Step RT-PCR kit (Gibco Life Technologies) and PSTVd-specific primers (nts 95-113 for the homologous primer and 87-68 for the complementary primer).

All reaction sets included negative controls (water-only and nucleic acids extracted from healthy tomato plants). Reaction products from the 2 symptomatic plants from the original survey, and the 6 seedlings inoculated with sap from 1 of the original plants, produced a band at about 350 bp corresponding to the predicted size of the PSTVd amplicon.No fragment was amplified from the 4 plants collected in later surveys, or in uninfected control plants.

To confirm the identity of the viroid as PSTVd, cDNAs amplified from the 2 original plants were subjected to direct nucleotide sequence analysis using the primers from the initial amplification. The resulting sequence (Genbank accession number AF536193) predicts a total size of 357 bp for the viroid species present in these plants and when used as the query sequence in a BlastN search, the amplicon was identified as PSTVd. The sequence most closely matched that of isolate PTVCGA (Genbank Accession number M25199), originally derived from potato (8), to which it shows more than 97 per cent
identity. In contrast, the isolate(s) sequenced from recent infections in tomato in New Zealand and Western Australia were most similar to the "Naaldwijk" strain (4).

The 3 distinct detection methods confirmed the presence of PSTVd in tomato plants showing typical symptoms. Nucleotide sequence data suggests that this variant was introduced from a source distinct from that responsible for other recent incursions. To eradicate the pathogen, plants on the affected property were deep-buried and greenhouses were sanitised with sodium hypochlorite. Subsequent tomato crops were monitored every 3 to 4 weeks, but so far no symptomatic plants have been detected.

Greenhouse-grown tomato plants in NSW were being extensively surveyed for PSTVd infection during 2002. Given the risk that PSTVd can be seed-borne and that Australia remains free of this pathogen, these results suggest import regulations pertaining to tomato seed may need to be more stringent.

References
(1) Constable F, Moran J (1996) PCR protocols for the detection of chrysanthemum stunt and potato spindle tuber viroids. Final report HRDC project no PT410. ISBN No: 07306 6557 7. 23 pp.
(2) Conde B, Connelly M, Pitkethley R. Potato spindle tuber viroid, Darwin strain -- further investigations in Darwin. Pacific Association of Tropical Phytopathology Newsletter 1996; 14: 7-9.
(3) Elliot DR, Alexander BJR, Smales TE, Tang Z, Clover GRG (2001) Infection of glasshouse tomatoes by Potato spindle tuber viroid in New Zealand. In "Proceedings of the 13th Biennial Australasian Plant Pathology Conference, Cairns". p224.
(4) Mackie AE, McKirdy SJ, Rodoni B, Kumar S. Potato spindle tuber viroid eradicated in Western Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 2002; 31: 311-2.
(5) Kryczynski S, Paduch-Cichal E, Skrzeczkowski LJ. Transmission of three viroids through seed and pollen of tomato plants. Journal of Phytopathology 1988; 121: 51-7.
(6) Fernow KH. Tomato as a test plant for detecting mild strains of potato spindle tuber virus. Phytopathology 1967; 57: 1347-52.
(7) Semancik JS. Viroid purification and charcterization. In: Graft-transmissible diseases of Citrus: a handbook for detection and diagnosis. Rome: IOCV/FAO, 1991: pp 233-41.
(8) van Wezenbeek P, Vos P, van Boom J, van Kammen A. Molecular cloning and characterization of a complete DNA copy of potato spindle tuber viroid RNA. Nucleic Acids Research 1982; 10: 7947-57.

[PSTVd causes significant crop losses in potato and tomato with yield losses of up to 65 and 50 per cent, respectively. It occurs in many countries, including the Americas, Asia, and Oceania. It also occurs in
western Europe (France, Netherlands, and eastern Europe). There are no resistant cultivars of either host. Eradication appears to be the only management option. PSTVd-infected potatoes are a trade issue, hence the need for constant awareness of possible outbreaks. Surveys for PSTVd in tomato were to be done in 2002. Do any of our readers in NSW have information on the results of that survey? If you have information, please let me know. - Mod.DH]

 

News release
6049

OTHER RELEASES FROM THIS SOURCE

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2003 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2003 by SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice