Brussels, Belgium
November 29, 2002
Yesterday, European Agriculture
Ministers reached a political agreement
on the Genetically Modified (GM) Food and Feed Proposal. "It is
encouraging to see that Ministers have, through careful
deliberation, opted for a regulation that provides some
consistency to authorising and labelling GM products across the
European Union, but some concerns remain," says Simon Barber,
Director of the Plant Biotechnology Unit of EuropaBio. "The
common position reached by the Agriculture Ministers appears to
show their general reticence towards encouraging the use of
innovative technologies in food and agriculture."
Member States voted for a decentralised environmental safety
assessment of GM seeds for growing, thus rejecting the European
Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as the central management body. "In
a Europe of 15 member states, a consistent set of rigorous
safety assessment standards across Europe coordinated and
managed by one central body is important but after Enlargement
in a Europe of 27, it will become a matter of necessity," says
Simon Barber. "EuropaBio supports a centralised safety
assessment procedure for GM products including seeds under EFSA
to ensure a single set of rules for a single market."
Ministers agreed to a 0.5% level of GM material that can be
present at trace levels (adventitious presence) in food and feed
products. According to Simon Barber "These levels are very low
and they will be tough, perhaps impossible, for countries that
are growing GM plant varieties, and especially developing
countries that are exporting their traditional food and feed
products to Europe." Furthermore, this only applies to GM
material judged as safe by a relevant scientificcommittee before
the Regulation enters into application. "There should be no
difference between a scientific committee opinion given next
week versus one given a year from now," says Simon Barber.
EuropaBio supported the Commission's proposal for a practical 1%
threshold for traces of all GM products that are declared safe
by relevant EU scientific committees.
The Commission's proposal to label any food and feed product
that has more than 1% of GM material was reduced to 0.9%. This
is not a matter of food safety as this refers to products
approved for use in the EU. "In setting such a low level,
Ministers have simply ignored current labelling practices, and
other country threshold levels ranging from 1-5%."
The Environment Ministers are due to reach a common position on
the traceability and labelling of GM products at their 9th and
10th December meeting next month. The two proposals will then go
back to the European Parliament for a second reading in the
first half of 2003. Last week, the Parliament overwhelming voted
in support of biotechnology (Damaio report) to contribute
towards finding genuine solutions to environmental problems,
sustainable development and food sufficiency, and help combat
chronic hunger and improve human health. EuropaBio now looks to
the Members of the European Parliament to support a pragmatic
framework for GM rules.
EuropaBio has almost 40 corporate
members operating worldwide and 20 national biotechnology
associations representing some 1200 SMEs involved in research
and development, testing, manufacturing and distribution of
biotechnology products. EuropaBio, the voice of European
bioindustries, aims to be a promoting force for biotechnology
and to present its proposals to industry, politicians,
regulators, NGOs, and the public at large.
|