Brussels, Belgium
November 28, 2002
IP/02/1770
David Byrne, Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection,
welcomed the political agreement reached today by the
Agriculture Council on the
European Commission's proposal to
label all genetically modified feed and to extend the current
labelling requirements for genetically modified food.
David Byrne said: "This new law further ensures consumer choice
through labelling of GMO derived food and also provides the
farmer with information. I feel strongly that our citizens need
to be able to make this choice. But I would also like to say
that I deplore scaremongering about GMOs: every GMO authorised
in the EU has been evaluated for its safety by independent
scientists and there are no known adverse effects on human
health from eating GMOs".
The Regulation as agreed today establishes a sound EU system to
regulate the placing on the market and labelling of food and
feed products derived from GMOs. It paves the way for the
adoption of the traceability and labelling proposal in the
Environment Council in December.
Details of the draft law
Labelling
The draft law will add to the current rules the labelling of:
- All foods
produced from GMOs irrespective of whether there is DNA or
protein of GM origin in the final product
- All
genetically modified feed
GM-food
Already today, retailers have to label a food consisting of or
containing GMOs. This also includes food
produced from GMOs if traces of DNA or protein from the genetic
modification is detectable in the final
product (such as flour produced from genetically modified maize
(see Annex 1 below).
However, the labelling provisions do not cover some foods or
food ingredients, such as highly refined soya or maize oil
produced from GM-soya or GM-maize. The effect of today's
agreement is to extend the current labelling requirements to
also cover such food (soya or maize oil produced from GM-soya or
GM- maize) and food ingredients produced from GMOs (biscuits
with maize oil produced from GM-maize) and to allow consumers to
exercise their freedom of choice. The label has to indicate
"This product contains genetically modified organisms" or "...
produced from genetically modified (name of organism)".
GM-feed
The agreement also introduces for the first time strict
labelling requirements of GM-feed along the
same principle as for GM food. Currently no labelling
requirements are in place for feed produced from
GMOs. The proposal will require labelling of, for example,
GM-soy meal and any compound feed that
includes in its composition the GM-soya meal. It will also
require labelling of corn gluten feed produced
from GM maize.
Threshold for labelling
Under current legislation the presence of GM material in
conventional food does not have to be
labelled if it is below 1% and if it can be shown to be
adventitious and technically unavoidable. The
Council agreed today on a threshold of no higher than 0,9%.
Presence of minute traces of GMOs in conventional food and feed
Minute traces of GMOs in conventional food and feed could arise
during cultivation, harvest, transport and processing. Whether
we like it or not this has become a reality. This is something
that is not particular to GMOs. In the production of food, feed
and seed, it is practically impossible to achieve products that
are 100% pure.
With this background, the EU`s objective is to ensure legal
certainty and establish certain thresholds above which
conventional food and feed have to be labelled as consisting of
or containing or being produced from a GMO.
GMOs scientifically assessed in the EU to be safe
Under current legislation, there is no tolerance threshold for
the adventitious presence of GM material
in food or feed which has not been authorised. The Commission
had proposed a 1% threshold for the
adventitious or technically unavoidable presence of such GM
material, provided that the GM material
has received a favourable EU scientific risk assessment and that
the operator can demonstrate that its
presence was technically unavoidable. Above this threshold the
product will not be allowed on the
market.
The Council decided today to set the threshold at 0,5% and to
limit its application to 3 years. The
Commission would however review the operation of this clause and
make a proposal for its extension if
appropriate.
Annex 1
Labelling of GM-Food and GM-Feed Examples (1)
GMO-type |
EXAMPLE |
Labelling
Required
at present |
Labelling
required
in future |
GM plant |
Chicory(2) |
Yes |
Yes |
GM seed |
Maize seeds |
Yes |
Yes |
GM food |
Maize, Soybean sprouts, Tomato |
Yes |
Yes |
Food |
Maize flour (3) |
Yes |
Yes |
Produced |
Highly refined maize oil, soybean oil, rape seed oil (4) |
No |
Yes |
From GMOs |
Glucose syrup produced from maize starch \* MERGEFORMAT 4 |
No |
Yes |
Food from animals fed on GM feed |
Eggs, meat, milk |
No |
No |
Food produced with the help of a GM enzyme |
bakery products produced with the help of amylase |
No |
No |
Food additive/flavouring produced from GMOs |
Highly filtered lecithin extracted from GM soybeans used in chocolate \* MERGEFORMAT 4 |
No |
Yes |
GM Feed |
Maize(5) |
Yes |
Yes |
Feed produced from a GMO |
Corn gluten feed, Soybean meal |
No |
Yes |
Feed additive produced from a GMO |
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin) |
No |
Yes |
|
(1) The examples include foods which have not been authorised for marketing in the EU.
(2) One chicory has been approved for breeding purposes under Directive 90/220/EC, but not for
food use
(3) DNA or protein of GM origin detectable in the final product.
(4) DNA or protein of GM origin not detectable in the final product.
(5) The current labelling rules entered into force in 1997, and do not include four GMOs approved prior to that date.
|