"Soybean basis levels became historically weak in
many areas this summer and remain very weak in most
areas," said Darrel Good. "The prospects for a much
smaller U.S. soybean harvest in 2007, and the
subsequent decline in stocks, suggests that 2007
crop basis levels will eventually return to more
normal levels, but will be influenced by the nature
of speculative activity in that market and by the
prospective size of the 2008 South American crop."
As soybean futures soared above $8, then above $9
this summer, basis weakened to unprecedented levels
in many areas, Good noted. Near maturity of the July
2007 futures contract, cash prices in Illinois were
60 cents to 90 cents under the price of that
contract. The basis was 30 cents to 40 cents weaker
than the extremely weak basis of the previous year.
"Even cash prices at the Gulf dropped below futures
prices," said Good. "Those cash bids were quoted at
18 cents over August 2007 futures on July 10 and 12
cents under August futures on July 24, 60 cents
weaker than on the same date in 2006.
"Cash prices remained well under the futures price
at delivery markets during the maturity of the July
2007 futures contracts. This failure of cash and
futures prices to converge at maturity of the
futures contract is similar to the problems
experienced with the soft red winter wheat futures
contract at Chicago for the past year or more."
Cash bids for harvest delivery of the 2007 crop are
also extremely weak. For various regions of
Illinois, for example, the new crop bids on July 19,
2007 were 70 cents to $1.25 under November futures.
Some, but not all areas, saw some modest
strengthening of the basis by July 26. Still, the
harvest basis is 30 cents to 40 cents weaker than on
the same date last year and 40 cents to 50 cents
weaker than during September 2005 when Hurricane
Katrina interrupted soybean shipping.
"A number of reasons have been cited for the
extremely weak old-crop basis this summer," said
Good. "These include historically large stocks of
soybeans which depressed cash prices and the
increased speculative interest in owning futures
contracts. June 1 inventories of soybeans in the
United States were estimated at 1.09 billion
bushels, 100 million larger than the inventory of
the previous year and nearly 400 million larger than
the inventory of June 1, 2005. The presence of those
large stocks allows end users to be less aggressive
in bidding to acquire their needs.
"Speculative interest in owning soybeans was driven
largely by the 11.4-million-acre decline in U.S.
soybean plantings, modest concerns about U.S.
weather conditions, and concerns that South American
producers would not make a large increase in soybean
plantings for harvest in 2008. Basis remained weak,
however, even as futures prices declined sharply
beginning on July 16."
Were producers harmed by the extremely weak basis,
Good asked?
"For those holding unpriced 2006 crop soybeans or
for those making new crop sales, the answer depends
in part on whether the cash or futures market
reflected the real value of those crops," he said.
"If the cash market reflected value, it might be
argued that those selling old crop inventories or a
portion of the new crop were not harmed by the weak
basis.
"While the recent decline in prices--both cash and
futures--has resulted in lower returns for holders
of inventory, that is a separate issue from the weak
basis. If futures markets reflected true value, then
holders of unpriced old crop inventory were
negatively impacted by the weak basis. Those clearly
negatively impacted by the weak basis are those who
were holding hedged inventories--short futures or
hedged-to-arrive contracts."
Buying futures and selling cash soybeans--lifting
the hedge--at the weaker than expected basis results
in a lower-than-expected net price. Conversely, long
hedgers benefited from lifting hedges during a
period of extremely weak basis. If the new crop
basis remains weaker than normal through the fall
months, there may be some implications for payouts
on crop revenue insurance products, depending on the
level of prices at that time.
"Prospects for a substantial strengthening of the
basis during the upcoming marketing year suggests
there is a potentially large return to storage of
the 2007 crop," Good noted. "On July 26, for
example, the average harvest bid in central Illinois
was $1.14 under July 2008 futures. If that basis
strengthened to a more normal level of minus 15
cents to minus 20 cents by next spring, the market
is offering storage returns of 90 cents to $1 per
bushel.
"As the new crop is priced, sales should likely be
made for delivery well after harvest, particularly
where on-farm storage is available. Unless deferred
delivery basis bids are aggressive, those sales may
have to be made with futures."