Urbana, Illinois
February 7, 2005
Additional pressures have hit corn and soybean prices so far in
February,
said a University of
Illinois Extension
marketing specialist.
"Futures prices have established
new contract lows and cash prices are nearing the harvest lows,"
said Darrel Good. "Corn prices have been pressured by the lack
of any friendly fundamental news. Exports continue to be
disappointing and there is some expectation that the USDA will
lower the projection of domestic feed and residual use of corn.
The USDA's monthly report of world supply and demand estimates
will be released on Feb. 9. Any changes in the projection of
feed and residual use, however, may not occur until after the
release of the March 1 Grain Stocks report on March 31.
"Recent declines in soybean prices have stemmed from generally
good growing conditions for the South American crop, a slowdown
in the pace of the domestic crush, and expectations of a shift
in Chinese business from the United States to South America.
March 2005 futures reached a new contract low of $4.985 on Feb.
4, and November 2005 futures reached a low of $5.20 on the same
day. The average spot cash bid in central Illinois declined to
$4.97, only 17 cents above the marketing year low established on
Oct. 13, 2004."
Good said that March 2005 corn futures traded to a new low of
$1.9425 on Feb. 4 and December 2005 futures traded within
one-half cent of the contract low of $2.265 established on Jan.
19.
"It would be extremely unusual for the December futures contract
to establish a life-of-contract low at this time of year," Good
noted. "Over the past 34 years, the December contract has never
had a low in January or March, and a low occurred in February
only once--1973.
"In addition, a low occurred in April only twice and never in
May. Some additional pressure on futures prices might be
expected into June or July if intentions to increase acreage are
confirmed and the planting season is
favorable."
The average spot cash price of corn declined to $1.78 on Feb. 3,
only 8 1/2 cents above the marketing year low established on
Nov. 4.
"Lows in that market have tended to occur in the fall--15 out of
the last 31 years-- or in the summer after harvest--14 out of 31
years," said Good. "The marketing year cash price reached a low
in January one time
--1980--and in February one time--1975. History, then, would
suggest for the current marketing year that either the November
low will hold or a new low would not be expected until July or
August, probably on the basis of another large crop in 2005."
The seasonal pattern of contract lows in November soybean
futures differs from the pattern for corn, Good noted. Contract
lows have been reached in January, February, or March in five of
the past 34 years. The most common time for lows, however, is
October/November--13 times--and July/August--eight times.
"The pattern of lows in the cash market is more similar to
corn," said Good. "Lows since 1973/74 have never occurred in
January or February. Lows occurred in March once, April once,
and never in May. The most common time for lows has been
October, with 11 occurrences, and August at nine times.
"Like corn, history would suggest that for the current year
either the October low will hold or a new low would not be
expected until August. The progress of the South American crop,
planting intentions of U.S. producers, the potential of soybean
rust, and spring/summer weather conditions will all have a part
to play in the price pattern over the next six months. History
may not provide an accurate guide for 2005."
Old crop corn prices remain below the loan rate with a large
loan deficiency payment (LDP) rate continuing in most locations.
In addition, bids for harvest delivery of the 2005 crop are near
the loan rate. As a result, the loan price serves as a price
floor for all of the unpriced crops for which an LDP has not
been established.
"The only risk for unpriced crop from the 2004 harvest for which
the LDP has not been established is the cost of storage," said
Good. "That is a relatively small cost and suggests that such
corn be held into the start of the growing season in order to
capture weather rallies should they occur.
"There is also no urgency to price additional new crop corn. In
contrast, there is considerable risk associated with holding
unpriced old crop corn for which the LDP or marketing loan
gain--MLG--has been established."
Soybean prices have once gain declined below the loan rate,
generating positive LDPs for the 2004 crop.
"Pricing strategies for soybeans, then, should be similar to
those for corn," said Good. "The loan price provides a price
floor for all unpriced soybeans for which loan benefits have not
been established."
By Bob Sampson, PhD |