June 3, 2004
As
Reported in the News - The
Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology
Gannett News Service
Scientists are
working to rewrite two lines of poetry many Americans learned as
children: "Poems are made by fools like me. But only God can
make a tree."
Using techniques similar to those that created genetically
modified crops, researchers in the United States and abroad
believe they are closer to using technology to develop desirable
traits in trees faster and more consistently than conventional
breeding practices, reports the Gannett News Service.
Commercial timber companies hope genetic modification can
produce trees that grow faster, resist insects and disease and
require less land to grow on.
Genetic modification also holds the promise of reviving and
strengthening tree species that have been devastated by pests
and disease such as the American chestnut.
For the average person, genetic engineering might mean backyard
fruit trees that produce consistently with less work.
The lines by poet Joyce Kilmer reflect the objections some have
about the whole idea.
Researchers and government regulators also worry about creating
a menace, such as a disease-resistant tree that grows like a
weed, crowding out other trees.
For that reason, the federal government requires researchers
using test fields to grow transgenic trees, as the modified
trees are called, to destroy the trees before they are mature
enough to release pollen that could fertilize their wild
cousins.
Regulators at the U.S. Department of Agriculture are taking a
go-slow approach as they write the rules that will determine how
experimental gene-altered trees move from the laboratory to
commercial markets, according to the Gannett News Service.
"We have to make sure it's not going to be a plant pest," said
Meghan Thomas, a spokeswoman for the USDA's Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
Even the seemingly laudable goal of bringing back trees that are
endangered could have unforeseen consequences. For example, what
plants and animals might be harmed if a tree like the American
chestnut, which has been absent from Eastern forests for 100
years, makes a genetically assisted comeback?
Engineered trees made sterile to avoid possible
cross-pollination with wild trees wouldn't make seeds, and that
would mean less food for wildlife, said Kate Heaton, senior
forestry specialist with the Natural Resources Defense Council
in San Francisco.
Heaton said the consensus among environmental groups is that the
government should move with caution.
"There are so many unknowns," she said.
Mankind has long butted into the natural process to try to
encourage certain characteristics in plants and animals.
To try to achieve a fungus-resistant tree by conventional
methods, male and female trees that appear to be particularly
resistant to disease are mated and the seeds harvested. But
growers have no guarantee the offspring will be as resistant as
the parent trees.
Genetic engineering makes the process more efficient, uniform
and predictable, researchers said.
Richard Meilan, a Purdue University tree researcher, is
enthusiastic about the possibilities of transgenic trees,
reports the Gannett News Service.
If manipulating genetic traits can control pollen, then allergy
sufferers might get relief. Developing commercial trees with
reliable and uniform characteristics could mean less pressure to
log old-growth forests.
"There are some risks, but I think they are minor and can be
ameliorated," said Meilan, a molecular physiologist.
Estimates on when the first commercial genetically modified tree
could hit the U.S. market vary. Some say it could be as soon as
five years; others say a decade or two.
Bill Libby, a retired forestry professor at the University of
California, sees a future for transgenic trees but not anytime
soon.
"People have a very special feeling about trees and about forest
ecosystems," he said. "I would put it in the ethical, mystical,
religious context."
Also, there may not be much of a demand for alternatives to
traditional crossbreeding until the world starts feeling the
effects of population growth and loss of forestlands, he said in
the Gannett News Service report.
As
Reported in the News is a weekday feature that summarizes
one of the most interesting stories of the day, as reported by
media from around the world, and selected by Initiative staff
from a scan of the news wires. The Initiative is not a news
organization and does not have reporters on its staff: Posting
of these stories should not be interpreted as an endorsement of
a particular viewpoint, but merely as a summary of news reported
by legitimate news-gathering organizations or from press
releases sent out by other organizations. |