Ottawa, Canada
January 23, 2004
The
Canadian Seed Trade Association (CSTA), representing the
interests of 165-member companies appeared before the Supreme
Court of Canada this week as an intervener in the Schmeiser vs.
Monsanto Appeal. In fact, Dr. Bill Leask, Executive Vice
President of CSTA states that, "The CSTA was the only intervener
in the case who was called upon by the Supreme Court to provide
expertise by elaborating on a specific issue." The CSTA was
asked to provide details on Issue 3 in its Factum: whether or
not there is any implied licence to save and plant seeds
containing patented genes and cells.
On January 20, 2004, the Supreme
Court of Canada heard Percy Schmeiser's appeal of a Federal
Court of Appeal decision that found the Bruno, Saskatchewan
farmer liable for violating Monsanto's Roundup Ready gene patent
in canola. This was the first patent infringement case in Canada
involving Monsanto's patented canola technology to be heard by
the Federal Court of Canada and challenging the validity of
patent rights for lower life forms under the Canadian Patent
Act.
The CSTA presentation to the
Supreme Court on January 20th included the following specific
points:
- There is no provision in the Patent Act which creates an
implied licence for farmers to save and plant seeds
- International treaties and discussions recognize and support
the practice of seed saving and exchanging seed, making
provisions for efforts aimed at the conservation and
preservation of plant genetic resources
- Saving seed of a bred plant variety that does not occur
naturally, for future planting in a commercial farming operation
does not constitute genetic resource conservation or
preservation work
Following the announcement of the
Schmeiser appeal to the Supreme Court in late 2003, the CSTA
found itself in a position where it had to intervene. "The CSTA
saw its role in participating in the Supreme Court hearing as an
intervener as defending the need for strong intellectual
property protection measures and the scientific method used to
develop new technology for the seed industry so that farmers can
benefit from continued access to leading technology," said
Leask.
The Supreme Court trial judgment
could have a serious impact on intellectual property protection,
investment in seed and agricultural research and severe
implications on the future of biotechnology in plants and seeds
in Canada.
"In the absence of appropriate
protection mechanisms for seed and plant inventions, Canada may
be unable to attract and maintain a thriving agricultural
biotechnology research community. Without intellectual property
protection, new crop technologies from around the world may no
longer be commercialized in Canada. It's questionable whether
Canadian farmers could continue to be competitive when marketing
their commodities on the world markets if they did not have
access to leading seed technology," Leask emphasized.
According to the International
Seed Federation (ISF) the most appropriate protection for
biotechnological inventions is through patents and the CSTA
concurs. Furthermore, the ISF considers that Plant Breeders'
Rights (PBR) and patent protection for biological inventions are
efficient intellectual property protection systems and
effectively co-exist in many countries around the world.
Tools for the protection of
intellectual property rights are available in many other
countries and are essential to the well-being of Canadian
agriculture. Plant breeders and researchers develop numerous
new, competitive varieties leading to higher yields, improved
drought resistance, pest protection and value-added traits.
Canadian seed companies make these developments possible through
significant investments, such as the estimated $38 million
during 2002 into research and development operation expenditures
and nearly $67 million into infrastructure investments to
conduct research and development activities. Such investments
are dependent upon effective intellectual property protection
mechanisms, such as PBR and patent protection to sustain them.
Headquartered in the nation's
capital, the CSTA represents the interests of 165 member
companies engaged in all aspects of seed research, production
and marketing, both domestically and internationally. As a
member organization consisting of plant breeders, wholesalers,
retailers and others, CSTA is committed to fostering an
environment conducive to researching, developing, distributing
and trading seed and associated technologies - with the goal of
bettering the choices and successes of its members and their
customers. |