Brussels.
Belgium
November 18, 2003
IP/03/1559
The
European Commission has presented proposals to reform the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) rules on tobacco, olive oil and table
olives, cotton and hops by emphasising competitiveness, stronger
market-orientation, improved environmental respect, stabilised
incomes for farmers and a higher regard for the situation of
producers in less-favoured areas (LFAs). The proposals will form
the basis of the next step of CAP reform following the reform
decisions adopted on 29 September 2003 by the EU's Council of
Ministers. For the four sectors concerned, a significant part of
the current production-linked payments would be transferred to
the de-coupled single payment scheme. The subsidies for hops
would be fully decoupled, as well as the aid for tobacco, for
which the Commission envisages a gradual approach in three
steps. For cotton and olive oil, a specific coupled payment
would be maintained. Thus, the proposal takes into account the
potential impact of a full decoupling in these sectors and in
particular the risk that production would be abandoned and of
declining competitiveness of rural areas. Today's proposals are
the follow-up to the Commission's Communication of September
2003 (see IP/03/1285 and IP/03/1314) to accomplish a sustainable
agricultural model for these sectors through the reformed CAP.
Following broad consultations with Member States, the concerned
regions and the representatives of the sectors, the Commission
introduced certain changes in the legal texts for tobacco and
olive oil (for details see below) as regards to the
communication. The proposed reforms would enter into force in
2005 and would undergo a mid-term review. They would be
budgetary neutral compared to past expenditure.
These
proposed reforms would give farmers the possibility to produce
in a market-oriented and sustainable way. Our proposals also
take account of the importance of cotton, olive oil, tobacco and
hops production. This is why we foresee targeted measures so
that farming does not disappear in certain regions,
said Franz Fischler, Commissioner for Agriculture, Rural
Development and Fisheries.
Raw
tobacco
The
Commission proposes that, to avoid a disruptive effect on
production, the decoupling and integration in the single payment
scheme should be carried out gradually. The conditions will be
discussed in the negotiations in the Agriculture Council. This
would be accompanied by a phasing out of the Community Tobacco
Fund and the setting up, in the framework of rural development,
of a financial envelope for restructuring tobacco producing
areas. This would provide the most sustainable policy for the
future in line with the European Union's strategy for
sustainable development, agreed at the Gφteborg European
Council. The proposed reform would begin with the transfer of
all or part of the current tobacco premium into entitlements for
the single payment.
Gradual
transfer of the current tobacco premium into the single payment
scheme
1st STEP |
Coupled
payment |
Transferred to single payment |
Restructuring envelope |
Level of
payment, by quantity group: |
' |
' |
' |
0 - 3.5
tonnes |
0 |
Completely |
None |
3.5 - 10
tonnes |
0 |
75% |
25% |
+ 10
tonnes |
2/3 |
1/6 |
1/6 |
2nd STEP |
Coupled
payment |
Transferred to single payment |
Restructuring envelope |
Level of
payment, by quantity group: |
' |
' |
' |
0 - 3.5
tonnes |
0 |
Completely |
None |
3.5 - 10
tonnes |
0 |
75% |
25% |
+ 10
tonnes |
1/3 |
1/3 |
1/3 |
3rd STEP |
Coupled
payment |
Transferred to single payment |
Restructuring envelope |
Level of
payment, by quantity group: |
' |
' |
' |
0 - 3.5
tonnes |
0 |
Completely |
None |
3.5 - 10
tonnes |
0 |
75% |
25% |
+ 10
tonnes |
0 |
45% |
55% |
This
proposed transfer is different to and more balanced than the one
proposed in the September Communication.
The
financial envelope for restructuring would be the difference
between a total envelope of 955 million and the proposed
coupled and decoupled aid as well as payments made under the
tobacco quota buy-back scheme. Each Member State would receive
an amount corresponding to the difference between its historic
expenditure during the reference period 2000-2002 and the
proposed coupled and decoupled aid, to be used in favour of
tobacco producing regions. The amounts would be an integral part
of the second pillar of the CAP. As a result of this approach,
the global support to the tobacco sector would remain identical
to the present day support.
The
Community Tobacco Fund will continue to finance information
measures as long as there is still coupled aid. The Fund will be
financed by reducing the coupled aid by 4 % in 2005 and 5 % in
2006.
Olive
oil and table olives
The new
support system for olive groves
The
proposal foresees that 60 % of the average production-linked
payments during the reference period 2000-2002, should be
converted into entitlements under the single payment scheme for
holdings larger than 0.3 ha. Smaller holdings would have their
payments completely decoupled. The surface area to be taken into
consideration would be established by the Member States on the
basis of the data in a Geographical Information System (GIS) for
olive cultivation, incorporated in the Integrated Administration
and Control System (IACS) and constantly kept up to date.
To avoid
creating a situation of imbalance in the market, access to the
single payment scheme would have to be limited to olive-growing
areas existing prior to 1 May 1998 and to new plantings provided
for under the programmes approved by the Commission.
The
remaining 40% of the direct aid, paid to olive-growing holdings
of more than 0.3 ha. during the reference period 2000-2002,
would be retained by the Member States, as national envelopes
for the granting to producers of an additional olive grove
payment. In order to introduce a fair system and at the same
time overcome technical difficulties, the aid would depend on
the surface area of the olive grove expressed as number of olive
GIS-ha. A record of the existence of the olive grove
prior to 1 May 1998 would have to appear in the
GIS for olive
cultivation and Member States would have to define up to 5
categories of olive groves which were eligible for aid on the
basis of their environmental or social value and the amount of
aid corresponding to each category. For simplification, the
olive grove payment would not be allocated below 50 per aid
claim. In order to ensure that tree numbers were maintained in
the future, it is proposed that a condition of receiving the
additional payment would be the maintenance of the number of
trees existing on 1st January 2005 (with a maximum
tolerated variation of 10%).
Future
Common Market Organisation for Olive Oil and Table Olives
The Oils
and Fats Regulation, 136/66
EEC, which 'inter alia' covers olive oil and table olives ,
will no longer be in force after 1st November 2004.
It should be replaced by a new Regulation covering olive oil and
table olives comprising measures for the domestic market, trade
with third countries as well as the promotion of quality in the
wide sense.
The
Commission proposes that, after an interim marketing year in
2004 of eight months (01/11/2004-30/06/2005), and starting in
2005, the marketing year for olive oil should run from 1st
July. The Commission also proposes that the current private
storage measures for olive oil should be retained. This
mechanism would continue to be used by the Commission as a
safety net. The refunds relating both to the export and to the
manufacture of foodstuffs preserved in olive oil, would be
repealed.
Since the
future of the EU's olive-growing sector depends to a large
extent on the entire industry committing itself to a
comprehensive quality-oriented approach, the existing quality
enhancement measures would be reinforced. This could be done by
three-year work programmes presented by operator's organisations
and by promoting activities with a multinational dimension. Also
activities which target quality could be stepped up and the
contribution of operators in the olive sector towards effective
quality monitoring and control of genuineness of olive oils
released for consumption could be reinforced.
In parallel
it is foreseen to reinforce the arrangements for appraisal and
audit by the Member States. However, the total budget for these
programmes should not exceed 10% of the national envelope, which
is greater than the maximum amounts which may be deducted from
production aid at present.
Cotton
The
Commission proposes to transfer the part of the EAGGF
expenditure for cotton that was destined for producer support
during the 2000-2002 reference period into the funding of two
support measures: the single payment scheme and a new production
aid, granted as an area payment. The total amount destined to
cover both measures would be 695.8 million of which 504.4
million is foreseen for Greece, 190.8 million for Spain and
0.565 million for Portugal.
40 % of the
budget envelope for producer support would be destined for the
granting to producers of an aid per hectare of cotton. On basis
of the 695.8 million budget, this aid would correspond to
278.5 million, i.e. 202 million in Greece, 76.3 million in
Spain and 0.2 million in Portugal. The new area payment would
be given for a maximum area of 425 360 ha (340 000 ha in Greece,
85 000 ha in Spain and 360 ha in Portugal) .The above mentioned
available amounts and the maximum areas proposed per Member
State would result in a unit aid per hectare fixed at 594 in
Greece, 898 in Spain and 556 in Portugal. In case the eligible
area under cotton exceeded the maximum area, the aid per hectare
would be reduced proportionally. As with other direct aids to
producers, the aid per hectare of cotton would have to comply
with horizontal obligations like cross compliance, modulation
and financial discipline.
In order to
allow producers and ginners to enhance the quality of the cotton
produced, the establishment of inter-branch organisations would
be encouraged. These inter-branch organisations would have to be
approved by Member States, be subject to controls and would have
in particular the responsibility to create inter-branch scales
rewarding production deliveries in quality terms. To do so, a
maximum of half of the crop specific aid could be differentiated
on the basis of specific criteria.
60 % of the
budget envelope (417.3 million) would be available for direct
income aid i.e. 302.4 million in
Greece,
114.5 million in Spain and 0.365 million in Portugal. The
direct income aid will be calculated on the basis of 795 per
hectare in Greece, 1 286 per hectare in Spain and 1 022 per
hectare in Portugal.
The
activities of each inter-branch organisation would be financed
by its members and by an EU grant of 10 per hectare. The total
budget for this purpose would thus be 4.3 million. A grower not
belonging to any inter-branch organisation would receive the
unit amount of aid. The balance with the total market
expenditure for cotton would be included in a rural development
envelope for cotton areas. This last envelope of 102.9 million
would be shared between Member States according to the average
area eligible for aid over the reference period and would be an
integral part of the second pillar of the CAP. The new
arrangements would apply as from
1 September 2005.
Hops
The hops
sector is currently fully directed towards the needs of the beer
industry. Integrating support into the de-coupled single payment
scheme would therefore be a sufficient safeguard of continuing
hop production in the EU. However, the Commission proposal
foresees the possibility for Member States to maintain coupled
aid, up to a maximum of 25%, in order to take account of
specific production conditions or specific circumstances in the
production regions.
According
to an assessment report, the future hops system must meet three
crucial requirements, i.e. maintain the viability of production,
ensure economic conditions favourable to production and
accommodate market trends. Concerning the first requirement, the
main elements of the existing hops CMO, which are the product
certification provisions and the central role of the producer
groups, would continue to apply as they have proved to be very
efficient. Integrating the hop production aid into the single
payment system would best fulfil the second and third
requirements.
As far as
the growers are concerned the proposed system would be simple,
flexible and sustainable, and would also equally provide for the
stability of present returns by means of an aid equivalent to
the present aid and a more efficient and direct transfer of the
support.
Moreover it
would offer alternatives for producers in the case of short-term
and structural market crises as the grower would be able to halt
production temporarily or to quit production and use the land
for other types of production.
The
legislative texts of the reform proposals for tobacco, olive oil
and table olives, cotton and hops will be available on the
internet at:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/capreform/index_en.htm
Further
details on CAP reform can be found at:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/capreform |