Brussels, 28th January
2003
DN: IP/03/127
Date: 28/01/2003 |
TXT:
FR
EN
DE
NL
PDF:
FR
EN
DE
NL
DOC:
FR
EN
DE
NL
Legal protection of
biotechnological inventions: Commission discusses progress with
Member States and establishes expert group
The European Commission has
met with Member States in order to try to speed up progress in
the implementation of Directive 98/44 (see MEMO/00/39) on the
legal protection of biotechnological inventions. Despite the 30
July 2000 deadline, the Directive has been implemented in
national legislation in only six Member States (DK, FIN, UK, IE,
SP, and GR). In December 2002 the Commission decided to request
the other nine formally to follow suit, on pain of being taken
to the European Court of Justice see (IP/02/1928). The
Commission has also set up a group of experts to advise and
assist it in preparing future annual reports on the development
and implications of patent law on biotechnology and genetic
engineering, as required in Article 16c of the Directive ("16c
reports"). The first such report was issued by the Commission in
October 2002 (see IP/02/1448).
Internal Market Commissioner
Frits Bolkestein said: "Unless the 1998 Directive is properly
implemented Europe's biotech sector will be working with one
hand tied behind its back and will fall further and further
behind. Implementing the Directive quickly is essential but at
the same time we need to keep a close eye on this fast moving
field and make sure the European policy framework keeps pace
with technical and legal developments. So I am delighted we have
been able to establish such an impressive group of experts to
help us prepare our annual reports on the interface between
patent law and the biotech sector."
"Biotechnology is the sector of
growth for the coming decades" said European Research
Commissioner Philippe Busquin. "To ensure Europe excels in
biotechnology, we need a robust European system for protecting
biotech inventions. This is what the European Directive will
give us, if properly implemented by Member States. I am
confident that the expert group will help us and Member States
to ensure that the Directive will work for research, innovation
and the public interest not against them."
Implementation meeting
The main purpose of the meeting
with Member States was to review the precise state of play
concerning the implementation of the Directive.
This meeting was the third one to
have given Member States (others were held in January 1999 and
January 2001) opportunities to explain the political and
technical obstacles which continue to block the implementation
of the Directive into national laws and/or regulations. Despite
the deadline for implementation being 30 July 2000, only six
Member States have so far implemented the Directive while the
other Member States are currently at varying stages of progress
(see annex attached).
In December 2002, the Commission
decided to request officially Germany, Austria, Belgium, France,
Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden to
implement the Directive on pain of being taken to the European
Court of Justice (see IP/02/1928). The latest meeting took place
within the framework of that infringement procedure.
The meeting also included an
exchange of views on the first report under Article 16c of the
Directive, issued by the Commission on 7 October 2002, and
entitled 'Developments and implications of patent law in the
field of biotechnology and genetic engineering' (see
IP/02/1448). The meeting concentrated on the key chapters of the
report, which cover the patentability of plants and animals, the
patentability of isolated elements of the human body and
exceptions to patentability. Member States welcomed the guidance
given by the report.
Finally, the Commission informed
Member States on the first meeting of the expert group it has
set up to assist and advise it in drawing up future reports.
Expert group on legal and
technical aspects of biotechnological inventions
The group's mandate is to analyse
important issues surrounding biotechnological inventions. It
will not touch upon ethical issues, which are the mandate of the
European Group on Ethics, but instead will focus more on legal
and technical aspects and on the mutual impact of the legal
framework and the research and innovation area.
The group brings together
renowned experts including representatives from the patent
profession, patent practitioners (from the private sector, big
business and a small biotech company), three legal experts, two
scientists and representatives from the European Patent Office
and the World Intellectual Property organisation (WIPO). The
mixed composition of the group will ensure that all relevant
aspects are dealt with, taking into account the various related
policy areas and the interests of different stakeholders.
The group is chaired by Mr.
Vincenzo Scordamaglia, a legal expert and former director of the
Secretariat of the Council. Mr Sven Bostyn from Maastricht
University was elected reporter for the first topic which deals
with the level of protection to be given to patents of sequences
or partial-sequences of genes isolated from the human body. Ms
Geertrui van Overwalle of the University of Leuven in Belgium
will report on "the patentability of human stem cells and cell
lines derived from them".
These topics will be discussed by
the group in March and May 2003 respectively, after which
reports will be made available to the Commission. The reports
will discuss the issues, analyse potential impacts and propose
possible options. Reports will be published at the same time as
the 2003 annual monitoring report of the Commission is
published, towards the end of the year.
The full text of the Commission's
2002 report can be found at:
http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/fr/indprop/invent/index.htm
And the full text of Directive EC
98/44 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions at:
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/1998/l_213/l_21319980730en00130021.pdf
Composition of the expert group
Chairman:
- Mr Vincenzo Scordamaglia
(Honorary Director-General of the EU Council - Consultant in
IPRs IT)
Reporters:
- Ms Gertrui Van Overwalle,
(Centre for Intellectual Property rights Faculty of Law Leuven
BE)
- Mr Sven Bostyn,
Assistant Professor of Commercial and Intellectual Property
Law (Maastricht University NL)
Members:
- Ms Ann Mc Laren
(Welcome CRC Institute University of Cambridge UK),
- Ms Siobhan Yates
(Director Biotechnology Directorate European Patent Office),
- Mr Jacques Warcoin
(Patent agent Cabinet Regimbeau FR),
- Mr Daniel Alexander
(Barrister, London, UK),
- Mr. Bo Hammer Jensen
(Director, Senior Patent Counsel Novozymes A/S DK),
- Mr Franciso Bernardo
Noriega (Deputy Director, Intellectual Property, PharmaMar
S.A. - ES)
- Mr Josef Straus
(Professor of law and Head of Department Max Planck-Institute
for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and
Competition Law, Munich DE),
- Mr Francis Quétier
(Genoscope- Evry, FR),
- Mr Ingwar Koch
(Director, Patent Law Directorate - European Patent Office),
- Mr Kjergaard (Senior
Counsellor Biotechnology and Genetic Resources, Traditional
Knowledge Division World Intellectual Property Organisation).
Implementation of Directive
98/44/CE on the legal protection of biotechnological
inventions
Member State |
Implementation : State
of play as per 24/01/03 |
Implementation Date |
Austria |
A draft law had been
submitted to Parliament but due to the general election,
the AT authorities are obliged to submit a new one. |
Delayed |
Belgium |
14-6-2001: Draft
law adopted by the Government and submitted to Parliament
on 21 June 2002. Debates taking place in Parliament |
Not clear but expected
before the General election (May 18 2003) |
Germany |
18-10-2000 : Draft
law adopted by Government and submitted to Parliament
Debates were taking place
in Parliament, but due to the general election (last
September); DE authorities are obliged to re-submit a new
draft |
Delayed |
Denmark |
|
May 2000 |
Spain |
|
30 April 2002 |
Finland |
|
30 June 2000 |
France |
Draft law adopted by the
Government on 31-10-2001 and currently under
discussion in the Senate. |
Delayed |
Greece |
Decree on 15-10-2001 |
22 October 2001
: Communication to the Commission |
Ireland |
|
30 July 2000 :
Regulations
Notification to the
Commission done |
Italy |
19-10-1999: Draft
law submitted to Parliament
26-9-2002: adoption
of the draft law by the first Chamber |
Not clear |
Luxembourg |
Bill submitted to
Parliament in June 2000
Parliamentary Committee on
Ethics has been dealing with the issue (meeting on 23
January 2001 with experts from EPO). The situation seems
to be blocked. |
Delayed |
Netherlands |
Report of the 2nd
Chamber (7-6-2000) providing for several amendments to the
draft law submitted on 28-05-1999.
Debate in plenary on
02-10-2000. |
Not clear |
Portugal |
Draft law has been adopted
by Parliament. The Minister Council has definitively
adopted the law. It will enter into force 6 months after
this adoption |
Expected for 1 July 2003 |
Sweden |
A law should be passed in
spring 2003 (debates in Parliament scheduled during spring
session) |
Not clear |
United Kingdom |
|
28 July 2000:
Implementation on time for articles 1-11
6 July 2001:
Implementation of Articles 13 and 14
1 March 2002:
implementation of Article 12 |
|