Forum

home   |   forum   |   news   |   job market   |   calendar   |   yellow pages   |   advertise on SeedQuest   

 
Rijk Zwaan - Leaving the corporate fold to become again a family owned business
Editorial views by Monique Krinkels, a freelance journalist based in The Netherlands who has specialized in the agricultural industry since 1982 and has covered the seed industry since 1990.

In the last few decades, many seed companies have become part of large conglomerates for whom plant breeding and seed production are but one of many activities. While a number of companies have remained in the private hands, very few have gone from family ownership to corporate ownership and back again.

Rijk Zwaan is such an exceptional company. after being family-owned for two generations, it became part of BP Nutrition and, subsequently, of the Cebeco co-operative, then returned to its roots and became a family-owned company once again.

A family-owned company is supposed to have many weaknesses compared to its competitors. Many believe that the shareholders lack financial ambition, hold on to the initial activities for too long, are not daring enough and pamper the employees overmuch, to name a few criticisms. The philosophy regarding leadership, strategy, finances, social security and management do not come up to the mark, is the general assumption.

According to FBNED, the association of family-owned companies, the opposite it true. Their research confirms that these companies are long-lasting, excel in their own niches, survive in bad times, have loyal and highly motivated employees and are far more consistent in their acts. The history of Rijk Zwaan, seems to confirm this viewpoint.

People as focal point

For three years, Rijk Zwaan was owned by a multinational, and for another thirteen years the majority of the shares were in the hands of a large co-operative. The main reason to again become a family-owned business was the ambition which the present owners share. The ultimate goal of most companies is to earn the optimal return on investment. Rijk Zwaan is an exception to that rule. The primary principle of the present owners, Anton van Doornmalen, Maarten Zwaan and Ben Tax, is to ensure that the employees have satisfactory, rewarding jobs.

“Our focal point is people”, says Ben Tax, one of the three board members of Rijk Zwaan. “And we succeed in creating the right circumstances for them. In a recent job satisfaction poll among several thousand Dutch and German companies, Rijk Zwaan ended in the top 3.” At the same time the company is commercially successful. “We have about 1,100 employees worldwide and subsidiaries in more than twenty countries, and we are market leader in several segments. We are among the top ten vegetable seed companies”, he adds.

History

The early history of Rijk Zwaan resembles that of many seed companies. In 1924 the founder (photo), who gave his name to the company, started a shop for vegetable seed in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Soon after, he started his own breeding activities. The company blossomed and became one of the leading seed companies in the Netherlands. In due course, the founder retired and his son Jaap took over. In the next decades the company expanded and founded subsidiaries in other countries.

For Rijk Zwaan as for many of its competitors, the 1980s were times of enormous changes. The seed companies recognised the opportunities which biotechnology had to offer, but realised that the investments would be exorbitant. At the same time the outside world, and especially the large oil, chemical and pharmaceutical companies, became interested in seeds. In their view, diversification was vital to their own businesses in order to spread risks. In a nutshell, their reasoning was: "The population will always increase and people have to eat". Moreover, both parties would profit from uniting activities, as they share in-depth knowledge of molecular biology.

In addition Jaap Zwaan had another matter to consider. He was in his late fifties and none of his children considered a career in the seed industry. When British Petroleum approached him in 1986, he was willing to sell the shares in order to ensure the survival of the company. Anton van Doornmalen and Ben Tax, who were appointed directors not long before, were not too happy with the decision. “We did not want BP to interfere with the daily affairs. Luckily the oil company agreed to keep its distance and to evaluate our results afterwards.”

Firm conditions

Only three years later, BP completely changed its strategy and decided to focus again on its core business. A private auction was held, but the employee council did everything it could to prevent the sale of the shares to an outsider. Even another seed company would not find favour in their eyes. The newly appointed director Maarten Zwaan, a nephew of Jaap Zwaan, as well as Anton van Doornmalen and Ben Tax also had some demands of their own. “We insisted that the job security should be guaranteed, that the company would be left intact and that the new owner would not try to change the corporate culture. The latter was especially important to us, as we believe people should be the focal point for a company.”

Ben Tax thinks it was especially brave of Maarten Zwaan that he took this stand. “Anton and I were young enough to easily find another job in case BP did not agree to our conditions, while Maarten was already in his fifties.” But again BP acceeded to their wishes and agreed to a management buyout.

“However, Cebeco, one of the original bidders, remained interested in the company and we later sold 70% of the shares to them.” This was done to finance the management buyout. At the time of the sale of the shares to Cebeco, an agreement was reached with regard to the corporate governance of the company and the eventual sale of shares in the future. Later, when Cebeco underwent a reorganisation, it sought to acquire the remaining 30% because being able to sell the whole company would certainly mean more profit than selling only a portion of it. However, the other three shareholders firmly rejected the proposal. Instead, they themselves bought the shares of Cebeco in 2002.

Values

“We are simply not interested in cashing in, as we do not strive for personal gain. I know that most people will consider this an irrational decision, but what counts for us is that we have the best quality of life working here and doing exactly what we love to do.”

Since that time, the threesome has kept Rijk Zwaan a family-owned company.

The corporate culture runs deep throughout the company: whether at one of the European subsidiaries or among South American or Chinese employees, the same values are held everywhere. “And all of our employees can participate in the share option plan. Only our employees are entitled to buy shares. Right now, they own 14% of the company.”

To ensure that knowledge is not lost, Maarten Zwaan has a seat on the board of advisors. His daily work has been taken over by Kees Reinink. Besides Maarten, the board consists of  Pieter-Klaas Jagersma, professor in international strategy at the Free University Amsterdam and at Nyenrode University in Breukelen, and Jean-Pierre van Leeuwen, a solicitor who became involved in Rijk Zwaan when the shares were bought from Cebeco.

Ben Tax is not sure what will happen in the long run. Appointing the right successor is always difficult for family-owned companies. “Of course I would like one of my children to succeed meat some point, but if and only if he or she is really capable of making a success of it. At the moment, one of Anton's daughters works in the company and she is doing a great job in the logistics department. But only time will tell whether our children will take up the reins in due course. We do not have to worry about it just yet. Until the time comes, we are just enjoying our daily work.”

10/05

SeedQuest does not necessarily endorse the factual analyses and opinions
presented on this Forum, nor can it verify their validity.


Copyright © 2006 SeedQuest - All rights reserved
No part of this editorial may be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast
in any form or by any process without prior written permission from SeedQuest