Forum

home   |   forum   |   news   |   job market   |   calendar   |   yellow pages   |   advertise on SeedQuest   

 
Discussions in Europe will sparkle
Editorial views by Monique Krinkels, a freelance journalist based in The Netherlands who has specialized in the agricultural industry since 1982 and has covered the seed industry since 1990.

When the European seed industry holds its annual meeting on October 10-12, the European Seed Association (ESA) will welcome five new member states. Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia, which became European Union members earlier this year, will join ESA. Besides this festive event however, some serious topics need to be discussed. All in all about five hundred delegates are expected in Brussels, Belgium.

A legislative loophole

“Europe is finding itself in a legislative loophole”, agrees Garlich von Essen, Director Public Affairs of ESA. “The differences with the USA regarding GMOs are still not solved. The WTO is still processing the claims and many assume that the US will win. However, on the positive side, some progress is being made.” Two weeks ago, the varieties that were accepted before the ‘moratorium’ have finally been placed on the common catalogue, ending an illegal situation.

Thresholds for adventitious presence

The remaining discussion is the thresholds for adventitious presence of GMOs in conventionally grown produce, as the issue of labelling has been solved earlier. It has been an ongoing debate for more than five years between the seed companies and the EU government. Last month the European Commission again postponed voting on this topic. “But as we will have a completely new Commission shortly, our hopes are that the matter will finally be resolved during the next few months. Also, as more and more people agree that the regulation must be practical, the outcome hopefully will be more favourable to the seed industry. The proposal discussed earlier would have fixed the thresholds at 0.3% for GMOs authorised for cultivation in the EU.”

As Director Public Affairs, von Essen is responsible for monitoring the political developments within the EU. He expects the newly appointed European Commissioners to be more realistic and decisive in coping with the agricultural issues. “But agriculture is definitely not a trendy business in Europe. And it does not help when some politicians publicly discredit agricultural biotechnologies.” A side effect is that, throughout Europe, fewer students are motivated to study agriculture and plant sciences, and this weakens the branch from within.

Biodiversity

Another important topic under discussion at the ESA meeting will be the biodiversity issue. It is often hard for politicians to understand the implications for the seed industry. Most Europeans are in favour of ‘benefit sharing’, but they base their conclusions on their appreciation of the situation in the pharmaceutical industry.

“Free access to medicines is a popular demand and many find it hard to accept that this access is regulated and limited by Intellectual Property Rights. With seed companies the situation is completely different. Plant Breeder’s Rights as applied in Europe allow everyone to use the final products in their own breeding programmes. Of course, the breeder of the original variety may charge the subsequent breeder, provided his material is included in a new variety and it represents an essentially derived variety (edv), but he may not deny access as such. Legislation should therefore facilitate access as well as guarantee the necessary reward for breeding and development.. We have to make politicians and the public note that point.”

Plant Breeder's Rights vs. patents

The third topic von Essen mentions is the different view of Europeans and Americans regarding the tools used for the protection of intellectual property. Generally speaking, Europeans are in favour of Plant Breeder’s Rights since the UPOV Convention is properly implemented and patent protection for plant varieties is excluded under the European Patent Convention, while in North America patenting is more popular. “Some think that the use of new technologies also warrant a new approach to intellectual property protection. On the other hand, our European approach to IP protection has a proven track record as regards the development of new varieties.”

Variety testing and listing

Another issue the European seed companies face is the variety testing and listing. “With governments contributing less and less and an expanding European Union, we have to consider how testing may be organised in the future. Our concern is the quality of the data and the way these tests are supervised. At the same time the costs of testing should be realistic. This discussion is just starting in Europe.”

10/04

SeedQuest does not necessarily endorse the factual analyses and opinions
presented on this Forum, nor can it verify their validity.

Copyright © 2004 SeedQuest - All rights reserved