Reflections on
the first meeting of the
International Treaty on Plant
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
Editorial by
Dr. Emile Frison,
Director General,
International Plant Genetic
Resources Institute
(IPGRI)
September 2006
The
first meeting of the Governing Body of the
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture does not sound like a source of cliff-hanger
thrills, but it was. Not until 5 in the morning on the last day,
after an all-night negotiating session, did delegates finally
agree the text of a contract that will govern the movement of
samples of plant genetic resources. With that in place, the way
is clear for farmers and plant breeders to get access to the
biodiversity they need to adapt agriculture to meet unforeseen
future challenges.
Historically, the world has depended, and continues to depend,
on genetic resources from elsewhere. In the 1920s a Russian
relative of wheat donated resistance to a fungal disease that
threatened the entire US harvest. A new virulent race of that
disease recently emerged and the solution will also almost
certainly be found in varieties from somewhere else. In recent
years the flow of material among breeders and farmers has
dwindled considerably. The Treaty loosens the regulatory log-jam
by establishing a multi-lateral system for access and
benefit-sharing. A single variety may have hundreds of ancestors
from scores of countries in its pedigree. Rather than having to
sign scores of bilateral agreements, contracting parties sign up
to the Treaty. That gives them facilitated access to the plant
genetic resources held by all the other contracting parties.
Possibly the most important of these plant genetic resources are
held in the genebanks of the Centres of the
Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). There are more
than 650,000 accessions, with a preponderance of the farmers'
varieties and wild relatives that are such a rich source of
sought-after traits. The Standard Material Transfer Agreement
(SMTA), agreed early that Friday morning, sets the terms and
conditions for the use of these and other materials under the
Treaty. Most notably, the SMTA establishes that any variety that
uses any material derived from the multilateral system is, by
definition, a "product". If that product is commercialized, a
payment of 1.1% of net sales goes into the Treaty's fund, to
support conservation and research in developing countries. The
payment is compulsory if the new variety is not available for
further use in research and breeding and voluntary if it is
available.
Official
PDF versions of the International Treaty on Plant
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
|
An
important and innovative aspect of the Treaty is the recognition
of a third-party beneficiary with a legal interest in its
enforcement. The SMTA is an agreement between provider and
recipient of the material, not among the contracting parties of
the Treaty, but the monetary benefits flow to an international
fund. FAO (the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations), acting as the third-party beneficiary, has the right
to bring legal action on behalf of the Treaty parties in cases
of suspected infringement.
Infringement will itself be easier to police, thanks to the
simple definition of a product and to the plans for an
integrated information system that will not only accumulate and
share information about the resources -- one of the non-monetary
benefits envisaged by the Treaty -- but will also make it easier
to track which samples were distributed to whom.
The
meeting was a huge success. Negotiators were willing to
compromise on the level of payments, for example, and each side
moved to meet the other. The seed industry, which some sceptics
were saying before the meeting would scupper any chance of
agreement, proved very constructive. So there is cause to be
hopeful, and we need it.
Swollen shoot disease of cacao, palm leafhopper, banana
bacterial wilt, Asian soybean rust, clover-root weevil, UG99
race of wheat rust; newly virulent pests and diseases are
battering at humanity’s food supply. Developed nations can
choose to afford plant protection chemicals, if they are
available and effective. For poor farmers in developing
countries, genetic resources are one of the few assets they can
use to secure their food supply. With the International Treaty
now in place, plant genetic resources will once again be able to
play a central role in improving agriculture and securing our
food supply for the future.
Dr. Emile Frison
can be reached
at
e.frison@cgiar.org
SeedQuest does
not necessarily endorse the factual analyses and opinions
presented on this Forum, nor can it verify their validity. |
Copyright © 2006
SeedQuest - All rights reserved
No part of
this editorial may be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast
in any
form or by any process without prior written permission from
SeedQuest |
|