Application (Reference EFSA-GMO-UK-2005-11) for the placing on the market of insect-resistant genetically modified maize MIR604 event, for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Seeds S.A.S on behalf of Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Question number: EFSA-Q-2005-046
Summary (0.1Mb)
Opinion (0.3Mb)
Summary
Following a request from Syngenta Seeds S.A.S on behalf of Syngenta Crop Protection AG within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the authorisation of the insect-resistant genetically modified maize MIR604 (Unique Identifier SYN-IR6Ø4-5) for food and feed uses, import and processing.
In
delivering its scientific opinion, the EFSA
GMO Panel considered the new application
EFSA-GMO-UK-2005-11, additional information
provided by the applicant and the scientific
comments submitted by the Member States. The
scope of application EFSA-GMO-UK-2005-11 is
for food and feed uses, import and
processing of genetically modified maize
MIR604 and all derived products, but
excluding cultivation in the EU.
The EFSA GMO Panel assessed maize MIR604
with reference to the intended uses and
appropriate principles described in the
Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on
Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk
assessment of genetically modified plants
and derived food and feed. The scientific
assessment included molecular
characterisation of the inserted DNA and
expression of the newly expressed proteins.
A comparative analysis of agronomic traits
and composition was undertaken, and the
safety of the new proteins and the whole
food/feed were evaluated with respect to
potential toxicity, allergenicity and
nutritional quality. An assessment of
environmental impacts and the post-market
environmental monitoring plan was also
undertaken.
Maize MIR604 was engineered with a modified
cry3A coding sequence (mcry3A)
derived from Bacillus thuringiensissubsp.
tenebrionis that encodes an
insecticidally active mCry3A protein
confering resistance to the Western Corn
rootworm (WCR) (Diabrotica virgifera
virgifera) and other related
coleopteran pests of maize like the Northern
Corn rootworm (NCR) (Diabrotica barberi).
In addition maize MIR604 was engineered with
the pmi (manA) gene from
Escherichia coli, which encodes the
enzyme PMI (PhosphoMannose Isomerase) as a
selectable marker. PMI allows transformed
maize cells to utilize mannose as a sole
carbon source, while maize cells lacking the
pmi gene fail to grow with mannose
as single carbon source.
The molecular characterisation data
established that a single insert with one
copy of the expression cassette containing
the mCry3A gene and the pmi
gene is integrated in the maize genomic DNA.
Appropriate analyses of the integration site
including sequence determination of the
inserted DNA and flanking regions.
Bioinformatic analysis of junction regions
demonstrated the absence of any potential
new ORFs coding for known toxins or
allergens. The expression of the gene
introduced by genetic modification has been
sufficiently analysed and the stability of
the genetic modification has been
demonstrated over several generations. The
EFSA GMO Panel is of the opinion that the
molecular characterisation of the DNA insert
and flanking regions of maize MIR604 does
not raise any safety concern, and that
sufficient evidence for the stability of the
genetic modification was provided.
Based on the results of the comparative
analysis of samples from a representative
range of environments and growing seasons,
it is concluded that maize MIR604 is
compositionally, phenotypically and
agronomically equivalent to conventional
maize varieties, except for the presence of
the PMI and mCry3A proteins.
The functional characteristics and the
potential toxicity and allergenicity of the
newly expressed PMI protein have been
explored through various studies, for which
in-vitro, in-vivo, and
bioinformatic-supported methods have been
employed. It was concluded that the PMI
protein did not show characteristics that
would indicate potential toxicity or
allergenicity.
A subchronic (90-day) feeding study revealed
no indications of adverse effects in rats
fed diets containing grains from maize
MIR604. In addition, a feeding study in
broiler chickens provided evidence of
nutritional equivalence of maize MIR604 to
conventional maize. These studies,
therefore, support the conclusion of the
compositional and agronomical comparison
that the genetic modification resulted in no
unintended effects.
The application EFSA-GMO-UK-2005-11 concerns food and feed uses, import and processing, but excludes cultivation in the EU. There are no indications of an increased likelihood of establishment or survival of feral maize plants in case of accidental release into the environment of maize MIR604 viable grains during transportation and processing for food and feed uses. Taking into account the scope of the application, both the rare occurrence of feral plants and the low levels of exposure through other routes indicate that the risk to non-target organisms is negligible. The scope of the monitoring plan provided by the applicant is in line with the intended uses of maize MIR604 since the environmental risk assessment did not cover cultivation and identified no potential adverse environmental effects. Furthermore the EFSA GMO Panel agrees with the reporting intervals proposed by the applicant in the general surveillance plan.
In conclusion, the EFSA GMO Panel considers that the information available for maize MIR604 addresses the scientific comments raised by Member States and that maize MIR604 is as safe as its conventional counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health or the environment. Therefore the EFSA GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 is unlikely to have any adverse effect on human or animal health or on the environment in the context of its intended uses.