News section
home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets resources directories advertise contacts search site plan
 
.
Australia's National Invertebrate Pest Initiative (NIPI) to foster grower adoption of integrated pest management practices for invertebrate pests in the grains industry

.

Western Australia
May 21, 2008

Source: GRDC's The Crop Doctor

According to Dr Gary Fitt, Deputy Chief of CSIRO Entomology, Australia, invertebrate pests cost Australian broadacre agriculture, not including horticulture and forestry, about $500 million per year in lost production.

The GRDC funded National Invertebrate Pest Initiative (NIPI) was set up to bring together entomologists from around Australia to foster grower adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) practices for invertebrate pests in the grains industry.

Such integrated approaches, using natural and cultural factors to limit pest populations and only supplementing with insecticides, are gaining momentum.

Growers recognise that sole reliance on chemicals for insect pest control is leading to resistance problems. IPM advocates “justified” strategic spraying, rather than “prophylactic” or insurance spraying, which is not a sustainable practice.

PestFax, a free email information service, provides weekly alerts to the WA grains industry of reported pest threats to crops and pastures and advises growers on pest identification and management.

The service commenced in WA by the Department of Agriculture and Food WA (DAFWA), has been running for more than 12 years. The same service is now available in SA/Western Victoria and Victoria/NSW, where it’s known as “PestFacts”.

PestFax Editor, NIPI member and GRDC Seed of Light winner, Peter Mangano said the more frequently a pest population is exposed to a chemical, the higher the selection pressure and the more quickly resistance is likely to develop.

He indicated the availability of low cost insecticides had accelerated this process.

GRDC supported DAFWA entomologist, Svetlana Micic, said that to successfully conduct IPM, many factors must be addressed.

Correct pest identification is critical, particularly as it’s easy to misidentify species such as mites, due to their small size, she said.

Ms Micic recommended accurate monitoring at key times, including after ‘break of season’ rain in autumn, before sowing and during seedling emergence and early plant establishment.

Cultural control options, such as intensive spring grazing of pasture to reduce feed on offer levels below two tonnes per hectare, can reduce pest numbers and their carryover potential between seasons.

Also, having fallows where no green material exists in paddocks for at least two weeks before sowing crops, is a useful strategy, she said.

Cropping rotations must be considered, with trials showing that pest susceptible crops, such as canola, have reduced pest pressure, especially from mites, when following a cereal rotation, than when following pasture, Ms Micic said.

According to Mr Mangano, grower attitudes to pest management vary enormously, from the risk-averse who spray insurance sprays, unaware of actual pest presence, to those who won’t spray, even with moderate numbers of pests, but choose to continue to monitor until threshold levels are reached.

He suggested reduced spraying and choosing softer insecticides that are target specific and assist the natural beneficial or “good” insects in their work.

These beneficial insects feed directly on, or are parasites of, the pests. Parasitic wasps, for example, will decrease aphid populations, if the wasps are allowed to build up to sufficient numbers.

www.grdc.com.au/pestlinks 
 

 

The Crop Doctor is
GRDC Managing Director,
Peter Reading

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated - Fair use notice

Other news from this source


Copyright © SeedQuest - All rights reserved