The EU's
Environment Council has today failed to support the rights
of Hungarian farmers wanting to grow biotech crops. This
follows a similar position taken by the Council towards
Austrian farmers when last December the Council chose to
ignore the advice of the European Safety Assessor (EFSA) and
rejected the Commission’s request to have Austria lift its
illegal ban on the cultivation of EU-approved GM crops (see
EuropaBio press release (1)). By acting in this way, the
Council continues to seriously damage the credibility of the
EU’s regulatory system which they helped to put in place and
on which much of Europe's innovative and industrial capacity
relies. Today’s decision simply denies
the freedom of choice to Hungarian farmers who want to grow
insect protected maize crops.
The
product, Mon 810, is designed to resist the European corn
borer, a widespread moth whose larva can destroy crops. It
is already grown in the EU in the following countries:
Spain, France, Germany, Portugal and the Czech Republic and
outside the EU in Argentina, Canada, Japan, Philippines,
South Africa, Uruguay and US, without
any safety or
environmental issues, clearly demonstrating that Hungary's
objections are without scientific foundation.
(Details
of the product and safety assessment appear below (2).
The
European Commission had asked the Council to overturn the
Hungarian ban on the genetically-modified maize seed that
has repeatedly been pronounced safe after rigorous and
protracted EU reviews.
"Once
again the Council is not following the advice of the EU's
own expert advisory bodies”, said Simon Barber, Director of
EuropaBio. “The
Council has failed in its responsibility to implement its
own laws and instead today’s failure suggests that the
Council favours State censorship rather than offering choice
to farmers to decide for themselves as to whether or not to
grow biotech crops; this is deeply discouraging for the
future of Europe’s agriculture and growth of the bio-based
economy.”
(1)
EuropaBio Press Release -EU
Environment Ministers vote against sound science
http://www.europabio.org/articles/PR_Environment%20Council%20061218.pdf
(2)
About
MON 810
In
1998 the European Commission gave its consent for the
marketing of Monsanto's
Zea Mays L.
line MON 810 and a number of EU countries have now
authorised the product. However, Hungary prohibited the
use and sale of the product in January 2005, but its
justifications for the prohibition were rejected in June
2005 and in March 2006 by the European Food Safety
Authority.
On 29
March 2006, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
concluded that there is no reason to believe that the
continued placing on the market of these products "is
likely to cause any adverse effects for human and animal
health or the environment under the conditions of its
consent."
(3)
Safety of MON 810
The
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
In close collaboration with national authorities and in
open consultation with its stakeholders, the European
Food Safety Authority (EFSA) provides objective
scientific advice on all matters with a direct or
indirect impact on food and feed safety, including
animal health and welfare and plant protection. EFSA is
also consulted on nutrition in relation to Community
legislation. EFSA is also a decentralised agency of the
European Union, financed by the Community budget.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/about_efsa.html
EFSA
Opinion adopted on 29 March 2006 on MON 810 (Question No
EFSA-Q-2005-294)
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/gmo/gmo_opinions/1439.html
About
EuropaBio
EuropaBio, the European Association for Bioindustries,
has 70 direct members operating Worldwide, 12 associate
members and 5 bioregions as well as 25 national
biotechnology associations representing some 1800 small
and medium sized enterprises involved in research and
development, testing, manufacturing and distribution of
biotechnology products.
http://www.europabio.org