News section
home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets resources directories advertise contacts search site plan
 
.
Final analysis of the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology finds that U.S. state legislatures continue to focus on agricultural biotechnology: regulating GMOs and support of biotechnology are most popular topics of legislation introduced in 2005-2006 session

.

Washington, DC
February 13, 2007

A new fact sheet and web database released today by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology reveals that agricultural biotechnology continues to be of interest to state legislatures, particularly with respect to concerns about marketing, economics and liability – issues that historically have not been the focus of federal regulatory efforts. During the 2005-2006 legislative session, 134 pieces of legislation related to agricultural biotechnology were introduced in 33 states and the District of Columbia.

The announcement of findings marks the fifth time that the Pew Initiative has monitored state legislative efforts in the area of agricultural biotechnology. As the PIFB project will be ending in March 2007, this is the final state legislation report.

This most recent analysis identified legislative engagement on issues identified in prior fact sheets, such as liability and contracts, but also highlighted some new areas of action, such as coexistence between GE, conventional and organic farmers and producers.

"In the 2005-2006 legislative session, states continued to balance a diverse set of interests – from capturing the economic value of agricultural biotechnology to weighing potential conflicts with existing conventional and organic producers," said Michael Fernandez, executive director of the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. "As states grapple with these issues, some stakeholders may also consider the broader existing regulatory framework and assess specific state responsibilities as they encounter situations where regulatory gaps appear to exist."

Twenty-nine percent of introduced legislation addressed the regulation of seeds and crops; 22 percent of introduced bills were in support of agricultural biotechnology; 16 percent of introduced bills sought to impose moratoria on GM crops and animals and 15 percent of legislation addressed rights and responsibilities of farmers and biotech seed producers by establishing liability for damages caused by genetically modified crops.

The fact sheet, entitled "State Legislative Activity Related to Agricultural Biotechnology in 2005-2006," chronicles and catalogues state and federal legislative activity relating to agricultural biotechnology in 2005 and 2006. It is accompanied by Legislation Tracker, a database that archives legislation. These items update a similar fact sheet and database prepared last year on legislative activity in 2005.

Highlights of the research include:

  • Of the 134 pieces of legislation introduced in state legislatures, 27 were adopted (20 percent of introduced bills), compared with 37 bills (22 percent of introduced bills) in 2003-2004 and 45 (28 percent of introduced bills) in 2001-2002. 
  • A new development emerged in 2005-2006 that focused on local lawmaking with 16 bills introduced to preempt (disallow) local and county regulations on GM seeds and crops. 
  • Hawaii and New York introduced the most bills respectively generating 44 and 13 pieces, with Hawaii adopting the most bills (7 pieces). 

Fact sheet: http://pewagbiotech.org/resources/factsheets/legislation/factsheet.php

Database: http://pewagbiotech.org/resources/factsheets/legislation/
 

 

 

 

 

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated - Fair use notice

Other news from this source


Copyright © SeedQuest - All rights reserved