News section
home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets resources directories advertise contacts search site plan
 
.
When will we have a serious debate about GM?

.

Adelaide, Australia
August 24, 2007

To manage issues such as climate change and land degradation, we need to embrace the full spectrum of human ingenuity and science, including technologies such as genetic engineering.

Respected University of Adelaide plant scientists, Professor Peter Langridge and Professor Mark Tester of the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG) today came out in support of the ‘GM Canola: An Information Package’ report released recently by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and have called for a serious and informed debate on the issue of genetic modification of foods.

They claim that the case for using technologies and improvements coming from gene technology is now incontrovertible.

“We now have yet another report that demonstrates the economic and environmental benefits that could be achieved through the introduction of GM canola into Australia,” said Professor Peter Langridge, Chief Executive Officer of ACPFG.

The latest figures show that GM crop adoption has grown by around 12% every year since the first release of GM crops in 1996.

Exhaustive studies in Europe and other parts of the world into the environmental and human safety issues related to GM crops have also been conducted.

“These studies have found no evidence of any negative effects and indeed suggest that GM foods are safer than conventional foods due to the high degree of scrutiny and analysis required for registration of a GM food crop,” said Professor Mark Tester ARC Federation Fellow with ACPFG.

“We are now seeing recognition of the reality of climate change and the impact of human activities at all levels of government and this has resulted in the development of serious plans and strategies to try and tackle or at least ameliorate the problems.” Professor Langridge stated. “If we are going to make real progress in the way we use new technologies, it is important that we have an open and honest debate, particularly about technologies such as genetic engineering.”

“A debate on the merits of these technologies is essential, of course, but it must be based on logic and evidence, not fear and belief. And the evidence is clear that the benefits are considerable, and the risks of deleterious consequences is decreasing by the year as predicted disasters fail to emerge,” Professor Tester concluded.

ACPFG headquarters are located at the University of Adelaide's Waite Campus. Major research nodes are also located at the University of Melbourne, Department of Primary Industries at Latrobe University and at the University of Queensland.

Funding has been provided by The Australian Research Council (ARC), the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), the South Australian Government, the University of Adelaide, the University of Melbourne, Department of Primary Industries (Vic) and the University of Queensland.

 

 

 

 

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated - Fair use notice

Other news from this source


Copyright © SeedQuest - All rights reserved