News section
home news forum careers events suppliers solutions markets resources directories advertise contacts search site plan
 
.
Biotechnology Australia responds to criticisms of the survey of public attitudes towards biotechnology

.

Australia
August 7, 2007

Accusations of push-polling in biotechnology poll are unfounded and unjustified

Accusations of push-polling in a survey of public attitudes towards biotechnology, conducted by an independent research company for the Australian Government agency Biotechnology Australia are unfounded and unjustified.

Responding to criticisms of the survey by anti-biotechnology activist groups, including Greenpeace and the GeneEthics Network, the Manager of Public Awareness for Biotechnology Australia, Mr Craig Cormick, said: "These accusations seem hypocritical when you consider the fact that the groups were involved in the round table with industry groups and researchers that workshopped the questions for the survey, and they were happy with the questions when they were developed.

"However, now that the survey has found a large change of public attitudes in favour of gene technology and biotechnology they have suddenly decided they are unhappy with the survey.

"Interestingly, two years ago, when the last similar survey was done, industry groups criticised the survey because it found that the public had many concerns about gene technology," he said.

"The fact is, the survey is statistically valid, is well regarded internationally, and many academic papers have been published based on the findings revealed by these biennial surveys of community attitudes to biotechnology. They are conducted by a highly-reputable independent research company, Eureka Strategic Research.

"The NGO criticism is misleading in calling the study push-polling, as this is when a survey is conducted with a hidden objective to disseminate information, rather than collecting opinions. This study is clearly not push-polling as it has used questions identical to those used in the past, it explored the public’s view of both risks and benefits of GM and was carefully balanced. The same questions have been used deliberately so that we can track changes in public attitudes over time.

"The NGOs who are taking issue with the survey are really taking issue with the Australian public, as it is their change of attitude towards biotechnology that is causing the NGOs most concern."

The full study, and the questions used in the survey, are available from Biotechnology Australia's website: www.biotechnology.gov.au/reports.

Related release:
- Biotechnology Australia report indicates that environmental concerns boost support for GM crops in Australia

 

 

 

 

The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originated - Fair use notice

Other news from this source


Copyright © SeedQuest - All rights reserved