Goiânia, Goias, Brazil
September 14, 2006
Statement of the 65th plenary
meeting of the International Cotton Advisory Committee
“The Social and Environmental Impacts of Cotton Production and
Use”
The International Cotton Advisory
Committee met in Goiânia, Goias, Brazil during September
11-15, 2006 for its 65th Plenary Meeting since 1939.
Representatives from 53 governments and 10 international
organizations participated in the meeting.
1. Global Cotton Demand Expanding
The Secretariat estimates that
world cotton use will increase by 3% to 26 million tons during
the current cotton season. World cotton consumption increased
every year between 1998 and 2005, and the expansion is now the
longest and largest on record.
1.1. World production is expected to remain at 25 million tons
for a second year in 2006/07, and ending stocks are projected to
decline by 1 million tons. The Secretariat believes that the
average level of international cotton prices is likely to rise
during 2006/07 as a result of the projected decline in stocks
and increase in trade. The Committee instructed the Secretariat
to strengthen its efforts to forecast cotton prices, and several
countries suggested that the Secretariat include the effect of
subsidies in their price model to improve its accuracy.
1.2. The Committee received reports from countries about
developments in their cotton sectors. Some countries reported on
the rapid advance of yields linked to the adoption of new
technologies, including biotechnology. Developing countries
reported that their industries are being severely affected by
cotton prices that remain below the average of previous decades,
and it was reported that government measures in some countries
are contributing to distortions in world cotton production.
2. Efforts to Reduce Negative
Impacts Must Continue
Member Governments reaffirmed that
production and export subsidies affect cotton prices and trade,
and lead to negative impacts on cotton farmers, especially in
the developing and least developed countries and, therefore, it
was suggested that these impacts continue to be evaluated and
reported by the Secretariat. The Committee reaffirmed the
critical importance cotton plays in the economies of developing
countries.
2.1. The Committee acknowledged the Sectoral Initiative on
Cotton from the four African countries of Benin, Burkina Faso,
Chad, and Mali and the importance of the Initiative in
contributing to solutions to problems involving cotton
production. The Committee strongly supported the trade and
development aspects of the WTO Initiative on Cotton and notes
that substantive progress on both is imperative. The Committee
recalled that members of the WTO agreed to treat cotton
ambitiously, expeditiously, and specifically.
2.2. The Committee called on the WTO and its members to urgently
resume the “suspended” Doha round of multilateral trade
negotiations. The Committee agreed that a liberalized world
trade system for cotton can best be reached through WTO
framework.
2.3. The Committee welcomed the work already done by WTO members
to provide assistance to the cotton sector under the development
aspects mandate, and encouraged the WTO, with support from the
ICAC, to continue to promote this aspect. It was noted that the
ICAC is assisting African countries with the adoption of
instrument testing systems. The Committee agreed that for full
benefits to be obtained for cotton in the WTO negotiations there
has to be coherence between trade and development aspects. The
Committee instructed the Secretariat to work with the WTO to
conduct annual workshops on cotton trade and development
aspects.
3. Better Practices in Cotton
Cultivation Encouraged
The Committee was informed that
cotton, a driving force for development, leads to increased
production of associated crops and livestock and contributes to
the development of professional associations in developing
countries. Insecticide use in cotton production is being
gradually reduced. A careful evaluation of cotton farming
practices in Africa and other developing countries indicates
that there are negative impacts associated with improper use of
pesticide and fertilizer, as well as positive results when
properly applied. More studies are required.
3.1. The Committee noted that in spite of significant advances
that have taken place, additional studies are required in the
agricultural production systems, which include indebtedness
linked to input finance; hardship of labor, especially for women
and children; inappropriate use of chemicals and other inputs
which may result in exposure of farm workers and have
environmental consequences.
3.2. The Committee discussed efforts to encourage the adoption
of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and other Better Management
Practices (BMPs) that enable producers to improve resource use,
enhance environmental outcomes reduce waste, assure market
access and strengthen relations with local stakeholders. In
addition, the Committee heard reports about the Better Cotton
Initiative (BCI). The BCI aims to promote measurable
improvements in the key environmental and social impacts of
cotton cultivation worldwide. BCI is a collaborative,
multi-stakeholder effort initiated by the World Wildlife Fund
(WWF) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC).
3.3. The Committee directed the Secretariat to form an Expert
Panel on the Social, Environmental and Economic Performance of
the world cotton industry. The Expert Panel will provide
objective, science- based information to the Committee on the
negative and positive aspects of global cotton production and
will make recommendations for further action as appropriate. As
one component of its mandate, the Expert Panel will gather
information from around the world on costs of agricultural labor
and the factors that affect those costs.
4. Standardization of Instrument Testing
Instrument testing of cotton is
gradually replacing hand classing, and the world cotton industry
is in the process of adopting standard systems and procedures
for the operation of cotton testing centers. The Committee is
supporting this change through the work of its Task Force on
Commercial Standardization of Instrument Testing of Cotton
(CSITC).
The CSITC reported that it will begin conducting Round Trials
among testing centers on a voluntary basis during 2006 so as to
provide information about the accuracy and precision of test
center performance to test center operators.
4.1. The objective of the CSITC is to enable all cotton test
centers to meet international standards of accuracy so as to
facilitate global uniformity in test center results and thereby
increase transparency and efficiency in the cotton market. The
Committee continued to take note of the concerns of developing
countries about the cost of purchase and operation of instrument
testing systems, and instructed the CSITC to consider ways that
costs could be reduced.
4.2. The Secretariat and members of the CSITC are also aware
that tests for additional fiber characteristics such as neps,
short fiber content and trash need to be developed and
incorporated into standardized instrument testing systems. The
Committee instructed the CSITC to be aware that implementation
of instrument testing systems must be gradual and will be
adopted on a country-by-country basis as and when appropriate.
4.3. The Committee noted that during the past year the CSITC
developed a project proposal to assist African countries in
their efforts to implement instrument testing systems. The
Committee expressed its appreciation to the Common Fund for
Commodities (CFC) for approving this project that will assist
African countries to participate in the Commercial
Standardization of Instrument Testing of Cotton. The ICAC notes
that the CFC is contributing a very significant amount to the
total project of US$2 million. The Committee also noted that
US$3 million are expected to be provided through co-financing
from the European Commission (EC) under its All- ACP Support
Programme on Agricultural Commodities. It is hoped that EC
co-financing can be formally confirmed at the soonest
opportunity.
5. The Committee on Cotton Production Research organized a
Technical Seminar on the role of biotechnology and crop
management in improving sustainability of cotton production.
The technical seminar included presentations on the benefits of
both cotton bio-technology and integrated pest management. Both
approaches may contribute to improved quality of life of cotton
producers and reduce use of pesticides. The Committee noted that
using biotech cotton can be a valuable component in an
integrated approach to improve the long-term sustainability of
cotton production.
5.1. The commercialization of biotech products requires a long
process of regulatory approval. Biotech cotton has significantly
reduced the use of pesticides, particularly insecticides. Proper
crop management and timely field operations do enhance the
benefits of new technologies. Crop rotations, pest resistant
varieties, growth monitoring and plant mapping and
rationalization of field activities have been proven to result
in better cotton production methods. The Committee on Cotton
Production Research recognized the role of the International
Cotton Genome Initiative (ICGI) in developing technologies that
will allow marker-assisted breeding in years to come. Proposals
were made to develop performance indicators against which
progress could be measured across countries in a uniform way for
improving cotton as an environmentally, economically and
socially sustainable crop.
5.2. The Committee on Cotton Production Research decided to hold
the
2007 technical Seminar on the topic of "The Vision for 2025".
5.3. The Committee received a report on preparations for the
World Cotton Research Conference-4 (WCRC-4) to be held in
Lubbock, Texas, USA from September 10-14, 2007. Participation in
the WCRC-4 is expected to exceed 600 scientists.
6. The Committee received a report from its Private Sector
Advisory Panel. The PSAP asked the executive director to
study the risks and benefits of creating a more formal mechanism
for private sector participation in the ICAC, without impinging
upon the essential nature of the ICAC as an intergovernmental
body, and to report his findings to the PSAP and the Standing
Committee for future consideration. The PSAP noted that it is
necessary that the private sector actively support the work of
the ICAC. The PSAP recommended that non-member countries join
the Committee. The PSAP discussed the issue of excess moisture
in baled cotton. The Panel suggested that governments should
prohibit destructive systems that add liquid moisture to bales
solely for the purpose of increasing weight. The PSAP strongly
believes that the work of the International Forum for Cotton
Promotion (IFCP) is necessary and important and that the ICAC
should continue to support the IFCP through the business plan.
There was a suggestion that the IFCP not limit its efforts to
national, fully developed marketing plans and consider
small-scale, regional or low-budget activities that may be
implemented at a sub-national scale. Members of the PSAP noted
that there is an increase in the number of inaccurate, negative
statements in the press regarding cotton production, including
negative statements from advocates of organic cotton who distort
the effects of conventional cotton production. The IFCP was
asked to consider ways that inaccurate statements could be
countered.
7. The International Forum for Cotton Promotion (IFCP)
conducted a session on demand enhancement during the Production
Conference that was held adjacent to the Plenary Meeting.
Participants in the session agreed that there are many
inexpensive techniques that can be employed to raise the profile
of cotton and cotton products, including “Cotton Days”,
cause-marketing to raise money for charities, fashion shows,
posters, and donated t-shirts for marathons. The Committee
agrees that efforts to build demand contribute to the health of
the cotton sector.
8. The Committee welcomed the statement made by the European
Union and its member states that the European Commission
continues to work toward becoming a member of the ICAC. The
Committee welcomed Kazakhstan and Zambia as the newest members
of the Committee. Member governments noted that the ICAC
provides public infrastructure in support of the cotton industry
that cannot be performed in the private sector, and that the
ICAC is an instrument of cooperation and communication to the
benefit of all participants in the cotton economy.
9. The ICAC expressed its appreciation to the Common Fund for
Commodities (CFC) for supporting commodity development and
acknowledged the benefits to the cotton industry of projects
financed by the CFC. Since the Fund became fully operational
in 1991, a total of 18 cotton projects have been supported. The
CFC has provided US $5.7 million in loan financing and US$22.7
million in grant financing for cotton projects. The Secretariat
and the Standing Committee were instructed to explore
multi-country and regional priorities for projects to be funded
by the CFC in the future and to present them in due course to
the CFC for inclusion in the Funds third Five Year Action Plan
(2008-2012).
10. The Committee thanked the Government and cotton industry
of Brazil for their hospitality and generosity in serving as
host of the 65th Plenary Meeting. The efforts of the
Secretariat and Organizing Committee in preparing for the
meeting were much appreciated. The Committee accepted an
invitation from the Government of Turkey to host the 66th
Plenary Meeting in the city of Izmir during October 22-26, 2007.
An invitation to host the 67th Plenary Meeting in Burkina Faso
in 2008 has also been accepted. The Committee is gratified to
note that invitations to host future plenary meetings have also
been received from Pakistan, South Africa, Tanzania and
Kazakhstan.
MEMBER GOVERNMENTS
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon,
Chad, China (Taiwan), Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Finland,
France, Germany, Greece, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan,
Republic of Korea, Mali, Netherlands, Nigeria, Pakistan,
Paraguay, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan,
Switzerland, Syria, Tanzania, Togo, Turkey, Uganda, United
Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Zambia, Zimbabwe. |