Washington, DC
October 31, 2006
Long-term population trends for
some North American pollinators -- bees, birds, bats, and other
animals and insects that spread pollen so plant fertilization
can occur -- are "demonstrably downward," says a new report from
the National
Research Council. However, there is little or no population
data for many pollinators, which prompted the committee that
wrote the report to call for stepped-up efforts to monitor these
creatures and improve understanding of their basic ecology.
In order to bear fruit, three-quarters of all flowering plants
-- including most food crops and some that provide fiber, drugs,
and fuel -- rely on pollinators for fertilization, and farmers
often lease thousands of colonies of bees to ensure pollination.
Research indicates that shortages of pollinators for agriculture
already exist and that decreases in wild pollinator populations
could disrupt ecosystems in the future. "Despite its apparent
lack of marquee appeal, a decline in pollinator populations is
one form of global change that actually has credible potential
to alter the shape and structure of terrestrial ecosystems,"
said committee chair May R. Berenbaum, Swanlund Chair,
entomology department, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
The report notes that much more data have been gathered on
pollinators in Europe, where researchers have definitively
documented declines and even extinctions. Nevertheless, there
was sufficient evidence for the committee to conclude that some
North American species are in decline, especially the honeybee.
Honeybees are crucial to agriculture, pollinating more than 90
commercially grown crops; for example, it takes about 1.4
million colonies of honeybees to pollinate 550,000 acres of
almond trees in California. Studies show that U.S. honeybee
populations have dropped since the 1980s, when a non-native
parasitic mite was introduced, although the full extent of the
decline is unclear because of problems with the way the federal
government collects statistics on the beekeeping industry. The
U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural
Statistics Service should improve its methods for surveying
honeybee populations, and do so on a yearly basis, the committee
said.
The shortage is significant enough, however, that honeybees had
to be imported from outside North America last year for the
first time since 1922, when the Honeybee Act banned such imports
for fear they would introduce non-native pests. Such fears are
still justified, the committee warned, recommending that USDA
and relevant agencies in Canada and Mexico take steps to prevent
the introduction of new pests, parasites, and pathogens if bees
are imported.
Antibiotic-resistant pathogens and encroachment by Africanized
honeybees also are hurting North American honeybee levels, the
committee noted. It recommended that USDA support research to
improve pest-management and bee-breeding practices.
Long-term trends for several wild bee species -- especially
bumblebees -- as well as some butterflies, bats, and
hummingbirds also show population drops, the committee found.
However, it emphasized that a paucity of data on most wild
pollinators, together with incomplete knowledge of their
taxonomy and ecology, make authoritative assessments exceedingly
difficult.
The causes of decline in wild pollinators vary by species and
are difficult to determine, the report says. Like the honeybee,
the bumblebee has been hurt by the introduction of a non-native
parasite. Many pollinator declines are associated with habitat
loss, although U.S. data often are inadequate to link the two
definitively; one exception is the drop in the bat population,
which can be attributed to destruction of cave roosts.
To better track wild pollinators in North America, the United
States should collaborate with Canada and Mexico to form a
network of long-term monitoring projects, the committee
recommended. A rapid, one-time survey should be conducted as
soon as possible to establish baseline data to which future
assessments can be compared. USDA also should support research
to improve the quick identification of pollinator species, which
is very difficult in the field.
Although the consequences of wild pollinator declines for
nonagricultural settings are more difficult to define, one
result could be a greater vulnerability of some plant species to
extinction, the report adds. Few plants rely on a single
pollinator, but certain species could be at increased risk.
Effective conservation and restoration of pollinator populations
requires a level of knowledge that does not yet exist, the
committee determined. It urged USDA and other federal agencies
to support research aimed at the sustainable management of these
populations. In the meantime, landowners can take simple and
relatively inexpensive steps to make habitats more "pollinator
friendly," for instance by growing native plants. Encouraging
such practices will require active public outreach, the
committee pointed out.
The North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC),
representing several agencies and organizations in the United
States, Canada, and Mexico dedicated to raising awareness of
this issue, requested the Research Council report. It was
sponsored by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S.
Geological Survey, the National Academies, and the Research
Council's Division on Earth and Life Studies. NAPPC will hold a
symposium on pollinators, including a presentation of this
report, on Wednesday, Oct. 18, at the USDA in Washington, D.C.;
see <www.pollinator.org>
for more details.
The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of
Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research
Council make up the National Academies. They are private,
nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and
health policy advice under a congressional charter. The Research
Council is the principal operating agency of the National
Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. A
committee roster follows.
Copies of Status of Pollinators in North America are
available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313
or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at
http://www.nap.edu. |