Columbia, Missouri
May 23, 2006
Grain markets are sending signals
to producers to look at alternative ways of selling their fall
crop -- for the next three years, say agricultural economists at
the University of Missouri.
"There are very mixed signals in the grain markets," says Melvin
Brees, of the
The Food and Agricultural
Policy Research Institute
(FAPRI) at the University of Missouri.
"The cash-grain market has disappointing prices due to weak or
wide negative basis," Brees said. "Meanwhile, December futures
prices at the Chicago Board of Trade are high, something rarely
seen after harvest."
Current cash bids at local elevators in northwest Missouri have
been around $2.20 per bushel. However, December 2006 futures
contracts are at $2.86; December 2007 at $3.10 and December 2008
at $3.23.
"You never see these high prices at harvest time," said Abner
Womack, co-director of FAPRI. "It's most unusual to have this
much optimism in the futures market."
FAPRI economists say high futures prices offer producers
opportunities to lock in prices that might not be available at
harvest.
"The lower corn prices at local elevators are caused by wider
than normal basis in those markets," Brees said.
Basis represents cash demand for the commodity and includes
transportation and interest costs relative to the current
futures price. High fuel prices helped widen basis points this
year. However, that accounts for only part of the difference,
Brees said.
Current cash prices are held down by large carryover stocks
after two years of record corn yields. The market is projected
to hold 2.2 billion bushels of corn in ending stocks.
The most recent USDA crop outlook projected 1.1 billion bushels
of corn in stocks by next year. That is based in part on growing
demand for corn to convert into ethanol and increased export
demand.
Also playing in the commodity price rise is heavy buying by
index funds that usually invest in other markets. However, this
year the funds have bought grain commodities, such as corn,
soybeans, and wheat. More traditional investments for outside
speculators have been precious metals, pork bellies or orange
juice.
"Fund buyers don't pay much attention to the fundamentals of the
grain markets," Brees said. "If they become disillusioned, that
money can leave the market quickly."
Womack said farmers can use the optimism brought to the
commodity markets by the outside investors. "Take the price, but
protect yourself."
"Farmers entering the commodities market should have grain, or
prospect of a crop, to protect their hedge," Brees said. Selling
on the futures when the seller holds grain in storage to protect
a price is called a "hedge."
Both economists cautioned farmer investors to proceed carefully.
"You have to study the market to figure out how to get a price
out of it," Womack said. "If you don't understand that, go talk
to someone who does understand it."
Brees said selling futures contracts can require farmers to pay
margin calls when the price changes. Therefore, he recommends
using "puts" and "calls." These are options to sell or buy grain
contracts.
"When the futures market was at $2.80 per bushel a 'put' cost 24
cents," Brees said. "That gives you an option to sell at a
future time corn for $2.80. If the cash price for your grain at
market time is less than that, you collect the difference."
Womack cited another example. "You can go into the market and
buy a December 2006 'put' at $2.50 for a dime. That locks in a
price on the low side. If corn goes below $2.40 you get your
dime back, and starts making money as the price drops.
"If the price goes higher, fine, you sell your corn at the
higher price. Although you lose your dime, it was cheap
insurance."
Brees said historical price records show few times that corn
prices are above $2.80 at harvest. "Going back 20 years, it
happened only twice and was close a third time."
Corn prices have been above $3.00 only 10 percent of the months
in two decades.
Optimism in the futures market is based on expected drop in corn
supplies and increased demand. "A lot can happen between now and
harvest," Brees said. "More corn acres could be planted and
yields could be higher than projected. That would increase the
supply on top of current large supply." In that case, prices
would plunge.
The situation can go the other way, as well. In 1996, when
Russia started buying corn, the price peaked at $5 per bushel.
"We almost ran out of corn and had only 426 million bushels in
stocks following a year with a short crop," Brees said. "High
prices were needed to ration the strong demand."
"That 1996 price was based on current year supply and demand,"
Brees said. "These futures prices are based on speculation of
future tighter supplies and stronger demand."
Producers should at least look at ways to sell part of their
crop at futures prices currently being offered, Brees said.
Sources: Melvin Brees and Abner
Womack (573) 882-3576 |