News section

home  |  news  |  solutions  |  forum  |  careers  |  calendar  |  yellow pages  |  advertise  |  contacts

 

Adventitious presence of GMOs: scientific overview for Canadian grains
March, 2006

Adventitious presence of GMOs: Scientific overview for Canadian grains
T. Demeke, D. J. Perry, and W. R. Scowcroft
Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86: 1-23

Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory 1404 - 303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3C 3G8

Full text PDF for subscribers to the Canadian Journal of Plant Science

ABSTRACT

The global expansion in the development and cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops has increased international concern about adventitious presence of GM materials in non-GM seeds and grains. GM events in canola, corn, soybean, cotton, flax, papaya, potato, squash, sugar beet, and tomato have received regulatory approval in Canada. However, GM cultivars are only in commercial production for canola, corn and soybean. More than 30 GM events have been approved in these three crops. Cases of unapproved adventitious presence of GM materials that have impacted grain trading and handling in Canada and other countries include StarLinkTM corn, GT200 canola, GM canola in mustard and recently Bt10 corn. Some countries have established tolerance and traceability requirements for adventitious presence of GMOs, while others are in the process of developing or adopting legislation. The threshold for labeling of adventitious presence of approved GM material in non-GM grain varies from 0.9% (e.g., EU) to 5% (e.g., Japan). Progress has been made in the development of DNA- and proteinbased GMO detection methods. However, only a limited number of these detection methods have been internationally validated. The challenges for detection methods include sampling, a lack of certified reference material, a lack of DNA sequence information for the design of event-specific primers, and the sheer number of individual events that may be present and tested for. Current efforts by ISO and CEN will be valuable for establishing harmonized and standardized GMO detection methods.

© 2006 Agricultural Institute of Canada


March 24, 2006
Related article from CropBiotech Update

Lack of agreement on tolerance and traceability of GMOs threatens global trade

At present, genetically modified (GM) crops are cultivated in 21 countries, and it is estimated that initiatives to develop novel biotech crops are underway in at least 63 countries, with increasing involvement of developing countries. Adventitious presence (AP) of GM materials in non-GM crops is considered an inevitable consequence of the production of biotech grains, and may be result of cross-pollination, seeding errors, and/or commingling during harvest, storage and processing. The AP of GM material in conventional crops is at the centre of a heated international debate, due to the potential adverse effects on biodiversity of GM “escapes”. The Third Meeting of the Parties (MOP-3) to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which concluded last week in Brazil, resulted in the adoption of international documentation requirements for living modified organisms (LMOs) in the international trade of agricultural commodities.

What challenges do we face in terms of availability of GMO detection methods, validation and implementation? In the review: “Adventitious presence of GMOs: scientific overview for Canadian grains” researchers from the Canadian Grain Commission examine these issues. According to the authors, the main challenges for dealing with the AP of GM materials in non GM crops include:

  • Variation in the tolerance and traceability requirements among different countries
  • Lack of internationally validated and harmonized assay kits for the detection of GM material for many commercialized biotech crops
  • Lack of specific protocols, DNA sequence information and certified reference materials, often considered confidential proprietary information for crops developed by the private sector
  • Absence of international consensus on sampling methods
  • Technical constrains and difficulties in the interpretation of units to be compared
  • Inability to differentiate between crops with stacked genes and mixtures of different GMOs

The authors also identify a case study where testing procedures to detect the presence StarLink TM corn, which had been approved in the US but not in Canada, had minimal impacts on the Canadian grain industry. The factors that made this possible were: the existence of effective regulations and validated detection protocols; effective monitoring; industry willingness to comply; and effective cooperation between the relevant authorities involved.

Subscribers to the Canadian Journal of Plant Science can read the article “Adventitious presence of GMOs: scientific overview for Canadian grains” at: http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/aic-journals/jan06.html#agronomy

CropBiotech Update

Other news from Crop Biotech Update

15,295

Back to main news page

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2006 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2006 by SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice