March, 2006
Adventitious presence of GMOs: Scientific
overview for Canadian grains
T. Demeke, D. J. Perry, and W. R. Scowcroft
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
86: 1-23
Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory 1404 -
303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3C 3G8
Full text PDF for subscribers to the
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
ABSTRACT
The global expansion in the development and
cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops has increased
international concern about adventitious presence of GM
materials in non-GM seeds and grains. GM events in canola,
corn, soybean, cotton, flax, papaya, potato, squash, sugar
beet, and tomato have received regulatory approval in
Canada. However, GM cultivars are only in commercial
production for canola, corn and soybean. More than 30 GM
events have been approved in these three crops. Cases
of unapproved adventitious presence of GM materials that
have impacted grain trading and handling in Canada and other
countries include StarLinkTM corn, GT200 canola,
GM canola in mustard and recently Bt10 corn. Some countries
have established tolerance and traceability requirements for
adventitious presence of GMOs, while others are in the
process of developing or adopting legislation. The threshold
for labeling of adventitious presence of approved GM
material in non-GM grain varies from 0.9% (e.g., EU) to 5%
(e.g., Japan). Progress has been made in the development of
DNA- and proteinbased GMO detection methods. However, only a
limited number of these detection methods have been
internationally validated. The challenges for detection
methods include sampling, a lack of certified reference
material, a lack of DNA sequence information for the design
of event-specific primers, and the sheer number of
individual events that may be present and tested for.
Current efforts by ISO and CEN will be valuable for
establishing harmonized and standardized GMO detection
methods.
© 2006
Agricultural Institute of Canada
March 24, 2006
Related article from
CropBiotech Update
Lack of
agreement on tolerance and traceability of GMOs threatens global
trade
At present, genetically
modified (GM) crops are cultivated in 21 countries, and it is
estimated that initiatives to develop novel biotech crops are
underway in at least 63 countries, with increasing involvement
of developing countries. Adventitious presence (AP) of GM
materials in non-GM crops is considered an inevitable
consequence of the production of biotech grains, and may be
result of cross-pollination, seeding errors, and/or commingling
during harvest, storage and processing. The AP of GM material in
conventional crops is at the centre of a heated international
debate, due to the potential adverse effects on biodiversity of
GM “escapes”. The Third Meeting of the Parties (MOP-3) to the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which concluded last week in
Brazil, resulted in the adoption of international documentation
requirements for living modified organisms (LMOs) in the
international trade of agricultural commodities.
What challenges do we face in
terms of availability of GMO detection methods, validation and
implementation? In the review: “Adventitious presence of GMOs:
scientific overview for Canadian grains” researchers from the
Canadian Grain Commission examine these issues. According to the
authors, the main challenges for dealing with the AP of GM
materials in non GM crops include:
- Variation in the tolerance
and traceability requirements among different countries
- Lack of internationally
validated and harmonized assay kits for the detection of GM
material for many commercialized biotech crops
- Lack of specific
protocols, DNA sequence information and certified reference
materials, often considered confidential proprietary
information for crops developed by the private sector
- Absence of international
consensus on sampling methods
- Technical constrains and
difficulties in the interpretation of units to be compared
- Inability to differentiate
between crops with stacked genes and mixtures of different
GMOs
The authors also identify a
case study where testing procedures to detect the presence
StarLink TM corn, which had been approved in the US but not in
Canada, had minimal impacts on the Canadian grain industry. The
factors that made this possible were: the existence of effective
regulations and validated detection protocols; effective
monitoring; industry willingness to comply; and effective
cooperation between the relevant authorities involved.
Subscribers to the
Canadian Journal of Plant Science can read the article
“Adventitious presence of GMOs: scientific overview for Canadian
grains” at:
http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/aic-journals/jan06.html#agronomy |