On March 10th 2006, the
European Commission reported (1) on the national measures to
ensure co-existence of genetically modified crops with
conventional and organic farming and concluded that the
development of EU-wide legislation on the co-existence of
genetically modified crops with conventional and organic
farming “does not appear justified at this time”.
What is clear from the
Commission’s report is that while some member states have
set in place reasonable science based rules to achieve a
fair co-existence regime, others have clearly developed
disabling rules that are aimed at denying choice to farmers
and consumers.
“We note that the Commission’s
report makes reference to these discriminatory and
disproportionate measures. We look to the Commission to
ensure that the rules which Member States put in place meet
the Commission’s own guidelines (2) on co-existence
published in July 2003. These guidelines provide a rational
basis to set in place procedures to meet the statutory
labeling requirements,” says Simon Barber, Director of the
Plant Biotechnology Unit at
EuropaBio – the EU Association for Bioindustries.
Co-existence is not a new
issue; many studies and farming practices have been dealing
with issues of growing one crop along side another crop
(3). The EU has set in place thresholds of 0.9% for GM
material found in non-GM crops, under this threshold there
is no obligation to label harvested crops as containing
GM. The recently published Joint Research Centre Study (4)
provides the background scientific and technical data that
indicates co-existence can function in the EU and that the
Community’s labeling standards can be reasonably achieved.
The report concludes that crop production at the 0.9 %
threshold set by the EU is feasible, with few or no changes
in agricultural practices.
“Those opposed to GMOs should
stop using co-existence as a means to deny freedom of choice
to Europe’s farmers and consumers. The record of successful
co-existence between GM and non-GM in Spain since 1998 is
proof that co-existence between different farming methods
works,” concluded Simon Barber.
(1)
Commission report on co-existence
(2)
Commission guidelines on co-existence
(3)
EuropaBio fact sheet:
Co-existence of GM and Non GM crops
(4) JRC study:
New case studies on the co-existence of GM and non-GM crops
in European agriculture
EuropaBio, the European
Association for Bioindustries, has 60 direct members
operating worldwide and 25 national biotechnology
associations representing some 1500 small and medium sized
enterprises involved in research and development, testing,
manufacturing and distribution of biotechnology products.