Parma, Italy
March 6, 2006
Source:
European Food Safety Authority
Opinion of the Scientific Panel
on Genetically Modified Organisms on the Post Market
Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants
(Question No
EFSA-Q-2004-061)
Opinion adopted on 25 January 2006
SUMMARY
A plan for Post Market
Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified (GM)
plants is mandatory in all applications for deliberate release
submitted under EU Directive 2001/18/EC and EU Regulation
1829/2003. PMEM aims at identifying possible unanticipated
adverse effects on human health or the environment which could
arise directly or indirectly from GM plants. PMEM is composed of
case-specific monitoring and general surveillance of GM plants.
Case-specific monitoring is not obligatory but may be required
to verify the environmental risk assessment, whereas a general
surveillance plan must be part of the application. The European
Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is responsible for assessing the
scientific quality of PMEM plans submitted with each
application. In this opinion, the GMO Panel presents more
specific guidance for applicants for developing PMEM plans. The
GMO Panel concludes that general surveillance can not be
hypothesis driven, but should, when possible, make use of
existing monitoring systems in addition to more focused
monitoring systems (e.g. farm questionnaires). Data quality,
management and statistical analysis are of high importance in
the design of general surveillance plans and comparison should
be made with baseline data. In addition the EFSA GMO Panel
explains the scientific rationale for this guidance and makes a
number of recommendations for the management and conduct of PMEM
by both applicants and risk managers.
Full report in PDF format:
http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/gmo/gmo_opinions/1381/gmo_op_ej319_pmem_en1.pdf
1 For citation purposes: Opinion
of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on the
Post Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically
modified plants, The EFSA Journal (2006) 319, 1-27. |