El Batán, Mexico
May, 2006
Source:
CIMMYT E-News, vol 3 no. 5, May 2006
Developing a global
strategy to conserve the extremely broad genetic
diversity of maize was the objective of an international
meeting held at CIMMYT headquarters in May. From left to
right:
Major Goodman, meeting co-organizer, North Carolina
State University; Brigitte Laliberté, Global Crop
Diversity Trust; Suketoshi Taba, meeting co-organizer,
Head of the maize gene bank, CIMMYT. |
Keepers of
worldwide maize germplasm collections meet at CIMMYT to see how
they can work together to protect and conserve these resources.
Farmers know you
protect and save your seed corn (maize) to ensure the next
harvest. It’s a lesson the world apparently has not learned as
gene banks, which could host tomorrow’s harvest of research
breakthroughs and unique traits, find themselves nearly as
endangered as the maize varieties and wild relatives they seek
to conserve.
The meeting of the
Maize Germplasm Network, sponsored by the Global Crop Diversity
Trust, the World Bank, and CIMMYT, was called to initiate a
global response to this growing crisis. Experts from around the
world met at CIMMYT in Mexico in early May to begin hammering
out a strategy for the long-term conservation of maize genetic
diversity. Neither national nor international maize collections
have fared well of late, as investments in public sector
agricultural research have steadily declined and fierce
competition for dwindling resources in the agricultural sciences
has risen.
“People recognize
that these collections have unique materials and are valuable,”
says meeting co-organizer Major Goodman of North Carolina State
University, “but donors simply do not like to get involved with
a commitment that lasts forever, and that is what we are talking
about with crop genetic resources collections.”
Ironically, the
reluctance to invest in these operations comes at a time when
molecular genetics opens new opportunities daily to exploit
genetic resources carrying resistance to plant diseases, insect
pests, and threats such as drought, soil salinity, and heat
stress. Collecting and preserving the basic sources of
resistance traits takes on added importance.
Meeting
participants found “remarkable agreement” on top priorities,
says Suketoshi Taba, head
of the CIMMYT maize gene bank and co-organizer of the meeting.
At the top of the list, he says, is rescuing landraces and
adapted germplasm identified as being endangered—both of maize
and its wild relative, teosinte. Also urgent is the need to
create proper documentation for all collections, both from the
Americas (considered “primary” diversity, being from the crop’s
center of origin) and from other continents (known as
“secondary” diversity). The ultimate aim is to facilitate use of
the collections while reducing redundancies and their costs.
Once proper documentation is achieved, it was proposed that
partners would work to establish a “meta-database” of existing
maize genetic databases. The essential but perpetually
under-funded activities of seed regeneration and recollection
must also be considered. Finally, participants agreed that
CIMMYT should serve as the coordinating institution for
advancing the identified priorities forward on the international
scientific agenda.
The genetic diversity of maize is exemplified by its
range of kernel colors and cob shapes, but extends to
less visible traits such as pest and disease resistance
and drought tolerance. |
The meeting
co-organizers expressed the consensus of the group in stating
that the challenges they face are beyond the capacity of any
single institution or nation—thus the need for a broad-based
solution. They also observed that clearly there are roles, such
as the costly long-term maintenance of collections and
distribution of seed for research, that are better assumed by
large gene banks, such as those at CIMMYT or the USDA maize
collection at Ames, Iowa. These banks, however, find it
difficult to regenerate varieties that originated in tropical or
highland areas, a role better played by national gene banks.
Furthermore, the national banks, when properly resourced, can
more efficiently collect new seed and distribute seed from
collections to local plant breeders and biologists. But those
wishing to implement such a division of tasks must first
overcome barriers of plant ownership rights, nationalism,
phytosanitary regulations, and a tower of database babble that
hampers effective documentation and use of collections.
“I am sure that
there is a role for the Trust in this work, particularly in
securing unique materials, securing landraces, and helping with
the backlog of materials that urgently need regeneration,” says
Brigitte Laliberté of the Global Crop Diversity Trust. “But it
is critical to the Trust that a global system and strategy is
established whereby there are roles for international
organizations and good links with national programs. This
meeting was a constructive first step.” |