El Batán, Mexico
May, 2006
Source:
CIMMYT E-News, vol 3 no. 5, May 2006
CIMMYT germplasm and
other contributions have improved the quality of wheat
in China. |
Global,
collaborative wheat research brings enormous gains for
developing country farmers, particularly in more marginal
environments, according to an article in the Centenary Review of
the Journal of Agricultural Science.
Forty years of
worldwide, publicly-funded collaborative research to improve the
yield potential and stress tolerance of wheat, along with
efforts to extend the outputs of this science in developing
countries, has lowered food costs for the poor, allowed food
supplies to meet the demands of rising populations, brought
better harvests worth US$ 3-6 billion each year to farmers, and
saved 1.8 billion hectares of natural ecosystems from conversion
to farmland, to name a few results.
These and other
findings appear in a recent review article by CIMMYT wheat
physiologist Matthew
Reynolds and 1970 Nobel Peace Laureate Norman E. Borlaug—one
of a series of papers to celebrate 100 years of publishing by
the Journal of Agricultural Science. The review traces how
international wheat breeding over the last five decades has
evolved into “…a global agricultural strategic and
trouble-shooting network that plays a central role in providing
food security in the developing world.” Led initially by CIMMYT
and later with the partnership of the International Centre for
Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), the network for
wheat and related crops provides a forum “…whereby institutional
linkages are fostered and maintained globally, not only through
exchange of germplasm, but also through knowledge sharing,
training programmes, international visits and development of
extended partnerships…” According to the article, centers like
CIMMYT and ICARDA have also played a key role in collecting and
conserving the landraces and other genetic resources that
improved varieties have replaced, making those resources
available worldwide and, more recently, ensuring that useful
diversity is rechanneled into improved cultivars.
“Given its
importance and accomplishments, it’s somewhat surprising that
global wheat breeding struggles to find investors,” says
Reynolds. Also noted by Reynolds and Borlaug was the fact that
most of the increased area of adoption of improved wheat
varieties since 1977 has occurred in more marginal, rainfed
areas, rather than favored irrigated farmlands, and that yield
increases from these varieties during 1979-95 were greater in
semi-arid and heat-stressed environments (2-3% per year) than in
irrigated areas (just over 1% per year).
“Considering the
issue of food security and its positive influence on the
livelihoods of poor people, it’s clear that publicly-funded
international centers provide a continuity in agricultural
development that would otherwise be lacking for many countries
where economic, political, and social instability are
commonplace,” the authors say.
A companion
Centenary Review by Reynolds and Borlaug discusses the future of
collaborative wheat improvement, in which, according to
Reynolds, researchers will apply technology-assisted
methodologies and powerful information tools to identify and
breed value-added traits into wheat varieties. “At the same
time, however, we’ll continue to seek farmer input to increase
the amount of useful genetic diversity in the field and the
local adaptation of varieties, as well as in testing and
promoting conservation agriculture practices.”
Regarding the
future, the authors say: “Policy-makers need to balance the
appeal of high-risk investments in the latest technologies with
the realities of resource-poor farmers, for whom tried and
tested technologies offer immediate and reliable solutions.”
To access abstracts or
full-text versions of the articles:
-
Impacts of breeding on international collaborative wheat
research
-
Applying innovations and new technologies for international
collaborative wheat improvement |