Brussels, Belgium
April 12, 2006
Today
the European
Commission gave its support to an approach proposed by
Health and Consumer Protection Commissioner Markos Kyprianou and
Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas on further steps to
improve the scientific consistency and transparency for
Decisions on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). The measures
proposed aim to bring about practical improvements which will
reassure Member States, stakeholders and the general public that
Community decisions are based on high quality scientific
assessments which deliver a high level of protection of human
health and the environment. These improvements will be made
within the existing legal framework, in compliance with EC and
WTO law, and avoiding any undue delays in authorisation
procedures.
In light of recent practical
experience acquired with the placing on the market of GMOs, the
Commission has decided that practical improvements could be made
to the system to improve the scientific consistency and
transparency for Decisions on GMOs and develop consensus between
all interested parties. These improvements will be made within
the existing legal framework, in compliance with EC and WTO law,
and avoiding any undue delays in authorisation procedures.
The Commission proposes that
the following practices be implemented:
- in the scientific
evaluation phase:
- to invite the European
Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to liaise more fully with
national scientific bodies, with a view to resolving
possible diverging scientific opinions with Member
States;
- to invite EFSA to
provide more detailed justification, in its opinions on
individual applications, for not accepting scientific
objections raised by the national competent authorities;
- The Commission will
fully exercise its regulatory competences foreseen in
the basic legislation to specify the legal framework in
which EFSA assessment is to be carried out;
- to invite EFSA to
clarify which specific protocols should be used by
applicants to carry out scientific studies (for example
regarding toxicology) demonstrating safety;
- Applicants and EFSA
will also be asked to address more explicitly potential
long-term effects and bio-diversity issues in their risk
assessments for the placing on the market of GMOs;
- in the decision-making
phase:
- The Commission will
also address specific risks identified in the risk
assessment or substantiated by Member States by
introducing on a case by case basis additional
proportionate risk management measures in draft
decisions to place GMO products on the market, as
appropriate; and
- Where in the opinion
of the Commission a Member State’s observation raises
important new scientific questions not properly or
completely addressed by the EFSA opinion, the Commission
may suspend the procedure and refer back the question
for further consideration.
This development of the GMO
authorisation process is not just the result of the Commission’s
internal reflections, but draws on discussions with Member
States and stakeholders. The Commission will discuss its
proposals with the Member States in the Council, and with EFSA,
in the coming months with the objective of building greater
consensus and transparency in this area of Community policy.
Background
Over the past five years, the
EU has put in place a stringent system to regulate the marketing
and production of genetically modified food, feed and crops. The
EU authorisation procedure ensures that only GMOs which are safe
for human and animal consumption and for release into the
environment can be placed on the European market. Clear
labelling rules allow farmers, other users and consumers to
choose whether or not to purchase such products and the rules
also ensure that each GMO can be traced at each stage of its
use.
The EU regulatory system, one
of the strictest in the world, is based on the granting of
individual authorisations for placing GMOs on the EU market,
following scientific evaluation on a case–by-case basis.
Requests for authorisations which do not fulfil all criteria
have been and will continue to be rejected. |