Western Australia
March 18, 2005Dramatic
levels of herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass and wild
radish in Western Australia have sounded an early warning for
producers in eastern states.
In a random survey of the
Western Australian wheat belt, researchers Michelle Owen and Dr
Michael Walsh found the vast majority of ryegrass (94%) and wild
radish populations (85%) were resistant to one or more
herbicides. In the northern region of the wheat belt there was
only one susceptible ryegrass population and no susceptible wild
radish populations found. In this same region almost 90% of the
wild radish and annual ryegrass populations were resistant to
two or more herbicides.
Dr Walsh offered the statistics
at GRDC Grower Updates in
the Australian southern grain belt in February, where he
commented on the effectiveness of stubble burning as a technique
for controlling the weeds.
At Corowa in southern NSW where
the GRDC update was also sponsored by the Riverine Plains
Farming group, members of the group who had visited Western
Australia and seen the problem first hand described it as "a
worrying wake-up call".
The aim of Western Australian
growers is now to limit the number of weed seeds entering the
seed bank and to that end Dr Walsh described a range of
techniques designed to harvest the weed seeds for later
destruction. But rather than harvest them, a number of Western
Australian growers rely on burning stubble to kill the weed
seeds in the paddock.
Dr Walsh said that the
effectiveness of this strategy depended on the heat generated by
the burn and the length of time that heat was maintained. His
research suggested that a temperature of 400°C for a minimum of
10 seconds was needed to kill ryegrass seeds and that for wild
radish the temperature needed to reach 500°C.
"Under Western Australian
conditions those parameters are unlikely to be met in a standing
stubble burn," he said. Citing the results of burning a 2.3
tonne standing stubble crop, he said that the required
temperature was reached only at 20cm height, well away from seed
on the ground.
" Under these conditions only
about 80 percent of the rye grass seed was destroyed. Good, but
not good enough," Dr Walsh said.
In contrast, where stubble was
concentrated in a windrow, the required temperature was reached
at ground level with 99% of the ryegrass seed killed by the
treatment.
"We estimate that by windrowing
the wheat stubble we concentrated 15 tonnes/ha of combustible
material for the burn," Dr Walsh said. "It's enough to kill
ryegrass seeds everywhere but under the ground."
Similar results were obtained
when either standing wheat or lupin stubble was burned in an
attempt to control wild radish. In neither case were
temperatures hot enough to destroy wild radish seeds on the soil
surface even though the burn was conducted at the start of the
burning season and at the hottest part of the day.
"However, when we burned
windrowed lupin stubble we recorded temperatures of 600°C for
two minutes 1cm below the soil surface," Dr Walsh said. "That
was hot enough to affect seed buried in the soil. If fire is
going to be used as a weed control tool the amount of
combustible material available is critical. In Western Australia
at least we've found that some form of concentration of the
stubble is needed.
"Narrow windrows have a number
of advantages beside concentrating combustible material. They're
easier to burn without affecting the rest of the paddock,
leaving a cover against wind erosion and, where the paddock is
lightly grazed over summer, sheep don't appear to unduly disrupt
the windrow." |