Columbus, Ohio
June 2, 2005Researchers
have uncovered the link between two biochemical pathways that
plants use to defend themselves against pathogens – pathways
that scientists have long believed worked independently of each
other.
Knowing
how these pathways of immunity work may one day help researchers
breed plants that can better resist a variety of pathogens, said
David Mackey (photo), the study's lead author and an
assistant professor of
horticulture and crop science at Ohio State University .
He and his colleagues explain
their findings in the current issue of the journal
Cell.
The researchers infected
Arabidopsis plants with a bacterial strain of
Pseudomonas syringae, a bacterium that usually
infects tomato crops. Both Arabidopsis, a plant of the
mustard family, and P. syringae are models that
researchers commonly use to conduct basic plant research.
One of the immune pathways that
interested the researchers recognizes what they call
pathogen-associated molecular patterns, or PAMPs. The PAMP
pathway appears to be a plant's first line of defense against
pathogenic attackers.
“The PAMP path induces a fairly
weak immune response,” Mackey said. “Even so, there is growing
evidence that suggests these kinds of responses are extremely
important in restricting the growth of many pathogens.”
The other pathway uses
disease-resistant proteins, or R-proteins, which can detect
certain molecules, called effectors, that are secreted by
pathogens. This pathway produces a stronger immune response than
the PAMP pathway, Mackey said.
He and his colleagues found
that the R-protein pathway steps in when PAMP is rendered
useless by a pathogen.
Certain types of bacteria,
including P. syringae, make a hypodermic needle-like
structure that pierces the outermost membrane of a healthy plant
or animal cell. The pathogen uses this conduit to send
infectious effector proteins into the host cell.
While P. syringae
injects about 40 different varieties of effector molecules into
a plant cell, the researchers focused on the actions of two of
these molecules – AvrRpt2 and AvrRpm1. Both target a protein key
to Arabidopsis health.
The scientists found that both
of these effector molecules effectively shut down the PAMP
pathway. But the plant's R-proteins detect this, and come to the
rescue.
“The R-proteins detect the
insidious activity by which the pathogen's effectors block the
PAMP pathway,” Mackey said. “PAMP defense responses are probably
often effective, but they may be blocked by the pathogen's
effector proteins. If an R-protein recognizes a pathogen's
presence, it usually induces a very strong immune response, in
most cases stopping a would-be infection.
“This work further suggests
that plants use an active, complex immune system to combat
pathogens,” he said. “They have complicated surveillance systems
that detect various infection-causing molecules and trigger
defensive responses.”
A next step in this line of
work is to look at other pathogen effector proteins and analyze
their role in causing infections.
Mackey conducted the study with
Ohio State colleagues Min Gab Kim, a graduate student in the
department of
plant cellular and molecular biology, and graduate student
Luis da Cunha and post-doctoral fellow Aidan McFall, both in the
department of horticulture and crop science; Youssef Belkhadir
and Jeffrey Dangl, both with the department of
biology at the
University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill; and Sruti DebRoy, formerly of the
U.S. Department of
Energy Plant Research Laboratory at Michigan State University.
Funding for this work came from
the National Science Foundation
and the NSF's Arabidopsis Project;
Ohio State's Ohio
Agricultural and Research Development Center; and the
U.S. Department
of Energy. |