July 28, 2005
Source:
The
Bulletin - University of
Illinois
The crop condition reports show
little improvement in corn and soybean ratings, but that is to
be expected; these ratings seldom improve when reports come in
toward the end of a week with 100° temperatures. Rainfall in
many places during the past week and a return to cooler
temperatures might brighten the general mood a bit, so ratings
might recover some, whether or not actual crop prospects
improve. At least the decline in both crops has been halted for
now, in time to do both crops some good in many fields but
probably not in all.
Lower temperatures will slow
water loss rates some, and the cooler nights are a definite
improvement, especially for corn, where high night temperatures
decrease the amount of sugars available for growth. While most
fields that pollinated starting in early July likely have kernel
numbers fixed, the improvement in conditions should help prevent
kernel abortion in many fields north of I-80. We have seen an
unusual amount of unevenness in pollination this year, with the
tail end of silking maybe 2 weeks later than normal, often on
scattered plants. This may go back to differences in time of
emergence or in plant damage early, with increased competition
on individual plants causing a delay in development as
conditions turned dry. This could be a small positive in some
cases if it helped more kernels to form in the field. However,
plants that get behind stay behind, and even if their larger,
neighboring plants didn't pollinate very successfully, they will
still be competitive during grain fill.
Most corn plants are in the
milk stage (R3), moving into the dough stage, when starch starts
to form from sugars in the kernel. A few advanced fields are
starting to dent, while some later-pollinating fields are still
in the blister stage (R2). This means that corn in most fields
is using all of its resources to fill grain, with photosynthesis
producing sugars, which move to the stalk and then rapidly into
the kernels. Except for blips due to conditions that reduce
photosynthetic rates (cloudy, too dry), the rate of dry matter
increase is steady during this period, which lasts for about 35
to 40 days. The grain-filling rate slows down a week or 10 days
before black layer, which marks the end of the process. On the
best day possible--good water supply, healthy canopy, bright
sunshine, low/high temperatures of about 63 to 88--the crop can
add about 10 bushels, or close to 500 pounds of dry matter per
acre. Few days are so ideal, and average filling rates during
this period are more typically in the range of 4 to 5 bushels
per day.
While we can sometimes help the
crop-filling rate by protecting the canopy from insects and
diseases, kernel number and canopy cover are set in most fields.
If we continue to get good weather, kernel number could well
limit yields in some fields. In the more typical case where
kernels don't reach their maximum size in most fields, we don't
think that kernel number limits yield. We don't really know in
most cases what maximum kernel size is, but we think it's
determined during the week or so after fertilization, when
kernel cells divide to reach their maximum number and potential
size. If you are curious about what maximum kernel size might
be, remove every other plant (which greatly reduces competition
and so increases filling rates), leaving eight plants in each of
four rows; take four ears out of the center of this "miniplot,"
shelling and taking kernel weights in this and an adjoining area
with normal plant numbers.
Conditions that lead to poor
kernel set often do not get corrected completely, so kernel
number is likely not to reach a maximum, even in fields with low
kernel numbers. Keep this in mind as you take kernel counts;
filling conditions, canopy cover, and health are still likely to
limit yields in most fields. To assess canopy cover, check when
the sun is high how much light is reaching the ground. In fields
with the poorest canopy development this year, I expect that 20%
to 25% of the sunlight will bypass the leaves and hit the
ground, lost forever to the crop. If the canopy loses color or
lacks enough water to function well, even light that is
intercepted may not be very effective.
The soybean story is looking
somewhat like the corn story this year, even though the rain has
done the soybean crop slightly more good than it has the corn
crop. Many soybeans in the southern half of the state are at or
near full height and so are near the end of the time when they
can add nodes, flowers, and pods. I have gotten more reports of
what seem to be low pod numbers, often only one or two pods per
node, and maybe none on the lower part of the plant. Remains of
flowers are still attached to many nodes, and one question was
whether these can still develop into pods. We doubt that can
happen, but even if the tiny pod is still attached and rainfall
can now make it start to grow, the competition among pods at
individual nodes tends to be intense, and it's doubtful that a
small pod can compete successfully with a large, established
one. Each leaf tends to feed the pods attached at the same node,
though there might be movement from one node to another if there
are no pods at a node.
Although making stand counts
and pod counts and estimating the number of seeds per node is
the standard way to estimate soybean crop prospects, it takes a
lot of time and often gives unsatisfactory results. It is
necessary to get into fields to see how podding and pod filling
are progressing, however. I suggest a simpler but more
subjective approach: take a stick and move the canopy sideways,
looking at general pod density and the length of the stems along
which pods have formed. Are there one, two, or three pods per
node? Along how many inches of stem have pods formed? Are there
gaps or nodes that lack pods at the bottom or top of the stem?
Look at the ground surface as well, to see if pods have dropped
off. Note how much pod filling has taken place in the pods.
Besides low pod numbers in some fields, I have seen some unusual
variability in pod size, probably due to uneven survival of pods
as the weather changed.
As we learned from 2003 and
2004, the extent to which seed filling has started by the end of
July can give a hint about the crop's vulnerability to stretches
of dry weather during August. The crop this year is at about the
same stage as it was in 2004, which is an advantage. Still, even
though we think root systems are generally healthy, the return
of dry weather and depletion of soil moisture will likely cause
some pods to drop and will reduce seed numbers in pods that are
still flat where seeds have not yet begun to fill. Both will be
negative for yield prospects, but as we discussed for corn, seed
number probably doesn't limit yield as much as seed size in most
fields. This means that having and maintaining a healthy canopy
will be critical for soybean over the next 5 to 6 weeks.
by Emerson Nafziger
|