News section

home  |  news  |  forum  |  job market  |  calendar  |  yellow pages  |  advertise on SeedQuest  |  contact us 

 

U.K. DEFRA statement in response to European Union Environment Environment Council of 24 June 2005
London, United Kingdom
July 13, 2005

A vote took place at the European Union Environment Council meeting on 24 June to decide on proposals to overturn safeguard actions taken by a number of Member States on certain approved GMOs.

The result of the vote was that the eight proposals were rejected by a qualified majority of EU Environment Ministers. The UK voted in favour of the Commission’s proposals. Following the vote EU Environment Ministers have asked the European Commission to gather further evidence on the GMOs in question and further assess whether the measures taken by Member States aimed at suspending as a temporary precautionary measure their placing on the market are justified. A note of the meeting of the Environment Council, 24 June 2005 can be found on the Environment Council website

Many people, inspired by a campaign run by Friends of the Earth, wrote to Defra Ministers and officials encouraging the UK to vote against the proposals put forward by the European Commission. Defra provided the following statement to Friends of the Earth in response:

Many people have written to Elliot Morley, Minister of State for Environment, regarding the vote, at the Environment Council meeting on 24 June, on the Commission’s proposal to overturn the safeguard actions taken by a number of Member States on certain approved GMOs.

As these e-mails were initiated by a campaign on your website we are responding to you directly and we would be happy for you to circulate this response to your members who have responded to your campaign. We will also be putting a statement on our website - www.defra.gov.uk

The Government strongly supports the agreed EU procedure (set out in EC Directive 2001/18), for making decisions on specific GM products. This legislation is fully compatible with the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Each GM application must be assessed by Member States on a case-by-case basis and decisions should be taken on the scientific assessment of the potential risks against the criteria in the Directive.

New evidence may come to light which might warrant a reassessment of the decision making process by which a GMO was approved, including the environmental risk assessment. On presenting such new information to the European Commission a Member State can legitimately prohibit or restrict the use, in their countries, of the GMO while the new information is being considered. Austria, Luxembourg, Germany, France and Greece have taken actions which they consider to be justified under the EC legislation.

Further information about the GMOs subject to actions by Member States can now be found on our website including a brief description of the GMOs in question and the extent to which they are used in the EU. [see table, below]

The UK’s position on GMOs is to assess each GM crop on a case-by-case basis taking account of the scientific evidence. With regard to the vote at the Env Council on 24 June the key issue was whether evidence had been presented in support of the actions taken by the Member States and whether any such evidence met the requirements of the directive. The UK Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment agreed with the European Food Safety Authority that no such evidence had been provided. The UK therefore had no other option but to support the Commission decisions calling for the safeguard actions invoked under Article 23 of Directive 2001/18 to be repealed.

The Deliberate Release Directive allows the EU to choose whether GMOs are placed on the market based on scientific evidence. If the safety assessment raised significant concerns then a GMO would not be approved in the EU.

USA, Argentina and Canada filed a complaint with the World Trade Organisation against the procedures regulating the import and marketing of GMOs in the European Union. The focus of the complaints is that the EU has allegedly not been operating its own approvals system for GM products since 1998. The UK Government has expressed its disappointment that this action has been taken which we regard as unjustified, and we are working with our EU partners to defend the case and find a solution. As with any WTO dispute we will be bound by the ruling, which will be reached after due consideration of the evidence. The UK agrees with the European Commission that existing EU legislation on GMOs is compatible with trade rules.

Status and current usage of GMOs subject to safeguard action under Directive 2001/18 in some EU member states – July 2005

GMO EU Approval* Cultivation status – worldwide** Cultivation status – EU** EU Import status** Art 23 ban in:
Syngenta Bt176 maize (insect resistant)

 

In 1997 (via France) for import and cultivation. Not marketed after 2004 (replaced by more modern GM type Bt11), residual seed stock grown in Canada, (2005 and 2006) for local use as fodder for livestock.

From 1996-2004 grown extensively in USA, Canada and Argentina.

Not marketed after 2004, residual stock of seed sown in Spain in 2005, (11000 ha).

From 1998-2004, up to 25000 ha grown in Spain each year (4-5% of total maize acreage) for use locally as fodder.

None – adventitious presence only. Austria, Germany & Lux
Bayer T25 maize (herbicide tolerant) In 1998 (via France)  for import and cultivation. Grown in USA (2% of maize acreage) and Argentina Never grown commercially in EU Yes, mainly as processed products, eg maize gluten feed Austria
Monsanto MON810 maize (insect resistant) In 1998 (via France)  for import and cultivation. Grown extensively in USA, Canada and Argentina Grown in Spain, (75000 ha in 2005) Portugal, France (1000ha) and Germany Yes, mainly as processed products, maize gluten feed etc Austria
Bayer MS1/RF1 oil-seed rape  (herbicide tolerant)

 

In 1997 (via UK) and in 1998 (via Fr). For import and cultivation. No longer marketed (replaced by more modern type MS8/RF3), last grown in Canada in 2003. Never grown commercially in EU None – adventitious presence only France
Bayer Topaz 19/2 oil seed rape (herbicide tolerant) In 1998 (via UK) for import only. No longer marketed, last grown in Canada in 2003 Not authorised for cultivation None – adventitious presence only France & Greece
Notes:

* all these GM traits also approved for use as processed products in food
**  information provided by the company concerned
ha = hectares

News release

Other news from this source

12,932

Back to main news page

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2005 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2005 by SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice