Central Queenland, Australia
July 18, 2005
No doubt you’ve heard something like it. “A good drought ruined
by rain”. “Beautiful day. Just watch someone come along and mess
it up.” Good examples of Australian humour.
Within the GRDC-supported
Central Queensland Sustainable Farming Systems project (CQSFSP)
the sorghum team is feeling a bit the same way. A good dry
weather experiment ruined by rain.
After years of drought in Central Queensland, consultant Graham
Spackman and Maurie Conway and David Reid from QDPI&F wanted to
know how much rainfall was captured in the following fallow when
sorghum is planted on wide rows.
According to Mr Spackman, the continued dry seasons meant some
Central Queensland farmers hadn’t grown crops, had little or no
stubble and the soil surface in paddocks with those problems
had become flat and fine.
Growers and the scientists working with them on the CQSFSP might
have increased their knowledge about grain yield response to
changing row configurations, but they don’t know yet what impact
stubble distribution after wide row sorghum is likely to have on
capture of rainfall and runoff.
Which is why the CQSFS team decided to set up the infiltration
trial on the Pukullas family’s property, Wyntoon, in a paddock
that had grown a light crop of chickpeas in 2004, leaving
minimum stubble, prior to the sorghum crop, which went in on row
spacings of 0.5m, 1metre, 1.5 and 2metres on December 31, 2004.
After spray out and harvest – 1.6 t/ha across all four
treatments – Mr Spackman says the CQSFSP team inserted 88 PVC
access tubes across the paddock, at 0.5 metre intervals across
all four row treatments.
The idea was to allow soil moisture levels to be monitored in
the post-sorghum fallow. The different levels of stubble cover
provided by the different row spacings were expected to have an
impact on runoff and infiltration in future rainfall events.
“Unfortunately”, the trial site received about 100 mm of rain in
May, followed by two subsequent falls of around 30mm.
Virtually all of the rain was captured in the soil because of
its low intensity, fully re-wetting the soil profile,
obliterating the stubble cover and the effects of row width
treatments on soil moisture accumulation.
Mr Spackman says while rain is always a great relief after
drought, the “fantastic but unexpected” rain means this trial
might not prove useful in determining sorghum row width impact
on capture of rainfall in the soil.
And he says this is a bit ironic, because in most circumstances
it is dry conditions that limit research outcomes – not wet
ones.
The Crop Doctor, Peter Reading, is managing director of
the Grains Research and
Development Corporation (GRDC), Canberra.
|