September 17, 2004
Even “dodgy” outsiders got a gallop in three years of extensive
searching for new lucernes that are easier to establish, easier
to manage and easier to remove in dryland cropping rotations.
New South Wales Department
of Primary Industries (NSWDPI) lucerne breeder Rex Williams
leads the search for a new generation of lucernes that will
allow growers – not the usual decline of the stand – to decide
when a lucerne paddock goes back under crop.
Supported by the Grains
Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) with $1.15
million over five years, the “Lucerne Alliance” project also
involves Queensland’s Department of Primary Industries and
Fisheries (QDPI&F and SeedMark.
Dr Williams’ research team compared 60 existing lucerne
varieties and breeders lines – including those “dodgy” ones –
in three replications at 15 sites in NSW and southern
Queensland.
“We’re not likely to carry out such extensive testing again, but
it was crucial for us to understand how existing lucernes
performed throughout the cropping zone in northern NSW and
southern QLD before launching into a major new crossing
program,” Dr Williams said.
“As usual, we wanted to identify the best varieties and breeding
lines, but we also wanted to use the trials to learn more about
the environments in which lucerne will have to perform and the
traits we need to breed into our new varieties to ensure they’re
even more successful.
“And we didn’t just sow the elite lines; we put in some of the
dodgy ones, like the old
Hunter
River variety, for instance, because susceptible lines can tell
us whether pests or diseases like phytopthora root rot and
aphids are a problem.
“The process helped identify the challenges in different
environments, because any lines that go through to commercial
release will have to perform well across a wide range of
conditions.”
Dr Williams said all sites were managed as cutting trials and
evaluated for three years using annual counts of stand density.
Breeding lines and cultivars varied in their performance across
sites, with NSWDPI bred cultivars Genesis, Aurora and Venus
performing well under trial conditions.
Several breeding lines produced high yields and persisted
extremely well across sites and one – a new, highly,
winter-active line – was being considered for commercial
release.
Other trends identified by the team through its three years of
trials were:
-
generally the more winter-active the lucerne, the higher the
forage yield across sites, although this was more the case
in the north than the south, possibly reflecting the ability
of the highly winter active types to take advantage of
longer growing seasons.
-
high winter-activity alone did not guarantee high yields,
-
the more persistent lucernes were not necessarily low
yielding, but tended to be those with lower levels of winter
activity, and
-
improved pest and disease resistance delivered no consistent
benefits to lucerne persistence or productivity across the
15 dryland sites, suggesting that general adaptation to
dryland conditions was more important to field success.
“While the incidence of pests and diseases in these trials was
quite low, the aphid susceptible cultivar Hunter River was still
one of the worst performers across sites,” Dr Williams said.
|