News section
U.S. National Association of Wheat Growers and state wheat associations secure crop insurance change for sprouted wheat
September 3, 2004

The National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG) and several of the state wheat grower associations in the Pacific Northwest have been working with USDA’s Risk Management Agency (RMA) this week to improve agency procedures for documenting quality losses due to sprout damage. On Friday afternoon, after close consultation with NAWG, RMA confirmed that it would publish a Managers Bulletin in response to NAWG’s request. At press time, the Bulletin was not yet available.

Current RMA procedures require that for grain delivered to a commercial elevator, every truckload of grain must be tested for sprout at a cost of at least $10 per sample. These procedures were instituted several years ago, after a USDA Inspector General’s report found excessive indemnities paid from allegedly manipulated grain samples. In contrast, grain in farm-stored bins can be accumulated and one test per bin will suffice.

In a pair of memos to RMA Administrator Ross Davidson, NAWG had pointed out that this treatment imposes additional cost and inefficiency on growers delivering to commercial elevators, and deviates from the standard practice of the industry for determining grades on grain. Some producers in Kansas and elsewhere had sprout claims denied because their samples were commingled according to standard commercial practice.

To remove the efficiency and preserve program integrity, NAWG proposed using final settlement sheets as the basis for determining sprout damage. The settlement sheet is evidence of the contractual sale between producer and elevator, and there is no incentive for manipulating the sample; instead, this document will specify the quality grades that the grower was paid on by the elevator, including any deductions for sprout damage. Settlement sheets are also used as proof under the Hard White Wheat Incentive Program (through FSA) that the wheat in question has met the requirements of quality standards and sales.

An additional justification for this approach is to make whole the producers who had previous claims denied because of commingled samples. Even the producers in areas where harvest is complete will have final settlement sheets for each lot they wish to claim, so this solution also addresses the problem of regional equality.

Requiring final settlement sheets for claiming a quality loss will mean that producers cannot apply for the loss adjustment until they have sold their grain and settled with the elevator. NAWG stated that this is a situation that producers would accept to avoid the cost and inefficiency of testing each truckload separately for sprout damage.

News release

Other news from this source

9774

Back to main news page

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2004 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2004 by
SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice