Brisbane, Australia
October 26, 2004
Grains Research and Development
Corporation
The Crop Doctor - Focus on
The Macquarie
Dictionary defines “precious” as “of great worth and value”.
It gives a second meaning as “of great moral or spiritual
worth”.
The University
of Western Australia’s Professor Stephen Powles could have had
both meanings in mind at the 4th International Crop
Science Congress in Brisbane, where he said modern herbicides
were too precious to be allowed to fail because of resistant
weeds.
“The technology that will dominate crop weed
control in 2020 will be conventional and gene driven herbicides
– modern, efficient, environmentally clean, selective
herbicides,” Professor Powles said.
“But they are more than just another resource
to be used by farmers. Glyphosate, which has allowed chemicals
to be substituted for the plough on so much of Australia’s
cropping land, is as valuable to farmers as antibiotics are to
the wider community.”
Professor Powles, who is director of the
Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) Herbicide
Resistance Initiative in Western Australia, told his congress
audience Australia had the world’s largest herbicide resistance
problem.
Other parts of the world shared the
Australian situation of farming systems and landscape with
little diversity, large farms and strong reliance on zero
tillage in broadacre farming, but not its widespread populations
of annual ryegrass.
“Sown and nurtured” over some 60 million
hectares, ryegrass was an excellent pasture grass for livestock,
but had emerged as a problem when farmers converted much sheep
country to cropping.
Ryegrass in Australia had become the world’s
most resistant weed species, because it was genetically diverse
and present at huge numbers across vast areas, where it then
was persistently treated with herbicide in a system with little
cropping diversity.
However, although multiple herbicide
resistant ryegrass was widespread in southern Australia, farmers
are doing a good job of managing this problem.
Farmers had responded to emerging resistance
with a number of non-herbicide strategies – doubling crop
seeding rates to suppress weeds, windrowing and burning stubble,
trailing chaff carts behind the header to catch the weed seed,
trailing hay balers behind harvesters and fitting harvesters
with extra sieves to capture ryegrass seed.
There was even an experimental mill – to
grind up weed seeds – being tested on some harvesters.
Professor Powles emphasised the need for more
diversity in the system, including phase pastures in their
rotations, two or three years of species like serradella before
returning paddocks to crop.
This enabled elimination of weed seed
production during the pasture phase, ensuring the farmer
commenced a subsequent lengthy cropping phase with very low weed
seedbanks in the soil
“However resistance management has to stay
profitable and farmers are mainly tackling herbicide resistance
with the herbicides that still work,” Professor Powles said.
“There is massive reliance on glyphosate and
trifluralin, especially in no till farming systems. These
herbicides must be preserved and one way to help ensure this is
to diversify herbicide use by rotating with other herbicide
groups
“For example, rotating to paraquat is a way
to help ensure the longevity of glyphosate. We’ve been
encouraging growers to practise herbicide diversity.”
The Crop Doctor, Peter Reading, is
managing director of the Grains Research and Development
Corporation (GRDC), Canberra |