Brussels, Belgium
October 19, 2004Source:
http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/04/241&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN
Agriculture
Fruit and vegetables
The Council held an orientation
debate on the fruit and vegetables market organisation.
Commissioner Fischler observed that there was a consensus to
continue on the path started with the reform of 1996. For
transformed products, the Commissioner said that the picture was
less clear and a deepened analysis was needed. Regarding crisis
management, he pointed out that the Commission was actually
working on a communication covering all sectors which could also
be useful for the fruit and veg sector. He showed himself
sceptical vis-à-vis suggestions to introduce specific promotion
tools in this sector, taking into account that horizontal
promotion tools already exist.
Organic Action Plan
The Council adopted conclusions
to kick-start the action plan for organic farming. Welcoming the
decision, Mr Fischler said “The fact that Council shares our
analysis of the situation illustrates that we have now a solid
and workable platform on which to build organic farming policy.
I have consistently maintained that organic farming, with its
focus on care for the environment, high standards of animal
welfare, and production of higher-value added quality foods
tailored to consumer demands, should occupy a central place in
the new CAP. And with these Conclusions, you give the Commission
the necessary support to do our part of the job. I also note
with satisfaction the explicit support for measures to improve
consumer confidence and the functioning of the internal market.”
WTO DDA
Commissioner Fischler informed
Ministers about the recent state of play of the Doha Round. “The
framework decided on 1 August in Geneva locks in the recent
reforms of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Overall
levels of the most trade distorting domestic support will have
to be substantially reduced and down payment of 20% of this
reduction is foreseen in the first year of the implementation of
the agreement. The Blue Box and the Green Box have been
preserved. Now technical discussions have started in order to
prepare an agreement on more detailed modalities in Hongkong end
2005.”
Mercosur negotiations
The Commissioner have an update
on the EU-Mercosur negotiations. Mercosur unilaterally presented
a new offer on 24 September. “Unfortunately, the offer turned
out to be degraded in global terms compared to the offer from
May this year.
In Mercosur’s offer on
agriculture, there were some disappointing elements such as
Mercosur coming back to the issue of EU internal subsidies, the
refusal of all elements which would protect geographical
indications and the back-stepping in market access conditions
for some EU key export products. Consequently, the EU side
decided to reciprocate by presenting an offer meeting the same
level of ambition as the Mercosur offer (i.e. a reduced offer).
In agriculture, our offer has also been reduced in certain
areas. No increase was made in the tariff quota volumes. We will
now see whether the Ministerial Meeting in Lisbon on 20 October
will lead to progress.”, the Commissioner underlined.
Rice imports
Mr. Fischler updated his
colleagues on the state of play of the new import regime for
rice under GATT Article XXVIII. The new regime adopted in July
is now in force as from 1 September and is based on a duty of 65
€/t for husked rice and 175 €/t for milled rice.During the
negotiations, it was possible to conclude an agreement with
India and Pakistan, but not with the other two partners having
rights in the negotiations, i.e. the USA and Thailand. “We will
therefore pursue the negotiations with both countries in order
to arrive at a mutually satisfactory agreement, bearing in mind
the sensitiveness of both our producers and our importers.”, he
stated.
Wine agreement with US
Informing the Council about the
latest developments regarding the EU/US negotiations to conclude
a wine and spirits agreement, Commissioner Fischler recalled
that the objective of the current negotiations was to agree on
an agreement which will be a first step agreement. “This means
that the level of ambition of this first step agreement cannot
and should not be compared to other important bilateral
negotiations on trade in wine in which the EU is currently
engaged. The negotiations on the conclusion of an agreement on
trade in wine resumed in September 2004. The discussion so far
has been rather constructive. And the Commission will continue
these talks. We are aiming at consolidating progress made so far
and resolving outstanding issues with a view to reaching a
mutually acceptable first step agreement as soon as possible.”,
he pointed out.
Bananas
The Commission said that
following the adoption by the Council of the GATT Article XXVIII
mandate to negotiate the move to tariff only for bananas in the
WTO on 12 July, the Commission have proceeded immediately with
the relevant notification to the WTO. “We intend to start
discussions with Ecuador, Costa Rica, Colombia and Panama on
Article XXIV.6 to discuss compensation for enlargement and on
Article XXVIII for the move to tariff-only, in the coming
weeks.”, Mr. Fischler explained.
US Bioterrorism Act
Commissioner Fischler made
clear that while the Commission shared the overriding objective
to improve the security of citizens by preventing bio-terrorist
acts, it believed that there were other ways of reaching this
objective without impeding trade. He said that the Commission
will continue to follow this issue closely with a view to having
a clear picture of actual impact on EU trade in foodstuffs.”, he
said.
School milk
As to the discussion on
changing the current school milk regime, Mr. Fischler pointed
out that there was a review four years ago which led to skimmed
milk products and yoghurts being made eligible for the EU
subsidy and a new calculation of the subsidy putting more
emphasis on the protein content of milk products instead of on
fat. “From the Commission’s point of view, the health aspects
have already been addressed and there are no obstacles to offer
low fat products to schools under the scheme. Although I
understand the Danish point of view, I believe that the only
objective basis to fix the aid amounts is to base ourselves on
the value of the milk components of the products concerned. Any
other criteria would be arbitrary and be contrary to the general
principles in our market organisations.”, the Commissioner
underlined.
Implementation of CAP reform
The negotiations on the CAP
reform resulted in June 2003 in various decoupling models: the
historical model (the one proposed by the Commission), the
regional model and within the regional model the so-called
hybrid model (requested by some Member States) where regional
and historic elements can be combined. In certain exceptional
cases under the hybrid model (chosen by some Member States,
including Denmark), there is the possibility to concentrate the
individually allocated historical payments (payments received
during the reference period 2000-2002) on very few hectares (the
hectares declared by the farmer the first year of application of
the Single Payment Scheme). It is clear that such practices
would not be desirable. However, there are instruments in place
to keep such practices under control.
Export refunds for cereals
Regarding Hungary’s request for
a special export tender for wheat, Mr. Fischler acknowledged
that the surplus situation is particularly serious in Hungary
and other Central European Member States, where historical
record harvest were attained. However, Fischler said that the
Commission could not accept the requests to open a special
export. “We have a Single Market and the heavy surplus
situation is rather the norm than the exception. There is no
justification to single out Hungary or any other Central Europe
Member State in this context. Moreover, EU wheat is
competitive internationally. The Commission accepts however
that such crop levels may cause some disturbance in the
organisation of cereal storage. That is why the Commission put
forward a proposal to accept the Hungarian requests linked to
payment of transport costs from intervention stocks to the
Romanian port of Constanza. Furthermore, the Commission is also
preparing a proposal to the Council adopting favourable
conditions for reimbursement of intervention storage costs.”,
Mr. Fischler stated.
State aids for Lithuanian
fruit producers
Last week the Lithuanian
authorities have notified to the Commission a project of State
aid aimed at compensating the damages suffered by owners of
apple orchards, strawberry and black currant plantations in the
areas affected by spring frosts which occurred in May 2004.
Mr. Fischler explained that the
services of the Commission were examining this measure in
co-operation with the Lithuanian authorities.
Co-existence
Mr. Fischler welcomed the
recent adoption by the Danish Parliament of national legislation
for the co-existence of genetically modified crops with
conventional and organic agriculture. The Danish law, which has
recently been formally notified to the Commission, is currently
being inspected by the Commission services. As regards the Task
Force for co-existence he stressed that the Commission was
strongly committed to help Member States in their process of
developing national approaches to co-existence. “The Commission
is currently in the preparation of setting up a coordination
network among the Member States. Even though I believe that
co-existence is best addressed on a national or regional level,
this does not mean that everybody has to re-invent the wheel.
The network will provide the means for mediating the exchange of
information on best practices and scientific results obtained by
the Member States.”
Concerning the labelling
thresholds for the adventitious presence of GM seeds in
conventional seed lots, the Commissioner explained that since no
thresholds for the adventitious presence of GMOs in conventional
seed lots have been established, any seed lot containing GM
seeds authorised for the cultivation in the EU has to be
labelled as containing GMOs. Seed lots containing GM seeds that
are not authorised for cultivation, can not be marketed in the
EU. |