Urbana, Illinois
October 4, 2004Now that
the posted county soybean price in many areas is below the
county loan rate, resulting in positive loan deficiency
payments, many producers may attempt to maximize net price by
separating the pricing decision from the decision about
establishing the loan deficiency payment,
said a University of
Illinois Extension
marketing specialist.
"The typical strategy is to establish the deficiency payment at
harvest price lows and retain ownership of the crop to capture
higher cash prices later in the year," said Darrel Good. "The
significant uncertainty surrounding soybean market fundamentals
over the next few months could make this a risky strategy for
soybeans. Some consideration should be given to managing the
risk of lower prices following harvest."
Good's comments came as he reviewed recent events in the soybean
market. Based on a U.S. production forecast of 2.836 billion
bushels and year-ending stocks of 190 million bushels, the USDA
has projected the 2004-05 marketing year average farm price of
soybeans in a range of $5.35 to $6.25 per bushel.
"The wide range reflects uncertainty about a number of important
factors, including the size of the 2005 crops in South America
and the United States," said Good.
As of Oct. 1, the combination of the September cash price plus
futures market price for the rest of the year reflected a
marketing year average price below the low end of the USDA's
projected price range. The September cash price used in this
calculation is the mid-month price reported by the USDA. That
price does not represent the actual weighted average cash price
for soybeans delivered in September (which includes pre-harvest
sales). That price will be reported at the end of October.
"At $5.77, however, the mid-month price was probably not much
different than the weighted average price for soybeans delivered
in September," said Good. "Pre-harvest sales were made at higher
prices, but spot sales were likely made at an average below
$5.77. Prices in the futures market are translated into an
estimate of average monthly farm prices by using the three-year
average basis for each month from October 2004 through August
2005.
"Finally, the estimate of the monthly cash price is weighted by
the past five-year average percentage of the crop marketed in
each month. Using this process, futures settlement prices on
Oct. 1 translated into a 2004-05 marketing year average farm
price of $5.25."
The average marketing year price reflected by the current market
is 55 cents below the mid-point of the USDA's range for the
expected average price. The difference might reflect a number of
factors, including different expectations about the size of the
U.S. crop. Based on early yield results, the market may be
expecting a larger crop than forecast by the USDA in September.
"In addition, the market may have different expectations about
the strength of demand for U.S. soybeans," said Good.
"Alternatively, the market may just reflect a difference of
opinion about the value of soybeans, not underlying supply and
demand factors."
One common way to judge prices is by examining the historical
relationship between the level of year-ending stocks and the
marketing year average farm price, as discussed here in early
August. Ending stocks are normally
expressed as a percentage of soybean use during the previous
year and then correlated to the average farm price. As expected,
there is a fairly strong negative correlation between stocks and
price. The USDA's September supply and consumption forecasts
produce a ratio of projected year-ending stocks-to-use of 6.9
percent. Based on the relationships of the past six years, this
ratio projects a marketing year average price of $5.41.
"Reversing the process, current market prices--average farm
price of $5.25--reflect a stocks-to-use ratio of 7.4 percent,"
said Good. "Using the USDA's forecast of marketing year
consumption of 2.758 billion bushels, the current price reflects
a crop of 2.845 billion bushels, only marginally larger than the
current USDA forecast.
"It should be emphasized that using the year-ending
stocks-to-use ratio as the only indicator of marketing year
average price has many shortcomings. The process should be used
only as a guide to forming price expectations. The analysis,
however, does suggest that the market is currently not
reflecting a crop much different than forecast by the USDA last
month. Instead, the analysis suggests that the market believes
that the USDA's current forecast of marketing year average price
is a little too optimistic."
All of the forecasts could change on Oct. 12, when the USDA
releases a new projection of the size of the crop and perhaps
revised forecasts of consumption and year-ending stocks.
"While soybean futures prices have declined about 45 cents since
the release of the September production forecast, it appears
that prices have only adjusted to that forecast, not to a larger
crop," said Good. "Further adjustments will likely have to be
made to any significant change in the production forecast."
By Bob Sampson, PhD |