Düsseldorf, Germany
November 24, 2004
Monsanto begrüßt die
Ergebnisse des Erprobungsanbaus mit gentechnisch verändertem
Mais, die heute auf einer Pressekonferenz des Landes
Sachsen-Anhalt und des InnoPlanta e.V. vorgestellt wurden.
Monsanto hatte für den
Erprobungsanbau im Frühjahr 2004 das Saatgut der
schädlingsresistenten Maislinie MON810 zur Verfügung gestellt.
Es hat sich gezeigt, dass auch
in Deutschland Koexistenz beim Anbau von gentechnisch
veränderten und konventionellen Maissorten mit einfachen und
praktischen Mitteln machbar ist. Die vielfach geäußerten
Bedenken hinsichtlich möglicher Beeinträchtigungen durch den
Anbau von gentechnisch verändertem Mais haben sich als
unbegründet erwiesen.
Darüber hinaus sehen wir uns
durch die Ergebnisse in unserer Ablehnung eines teilweise
geforderten Haftungsfonds für angebliche ökonomische
Auswirkungen des Anbaus sicherheitsbewerteter und genehmigter
Sorten bestätigt. Jetzt sind vielmehr intelligente Lösungen
unter Einbeziehung der Warenkette gefragt, die allen Landwirten
faire Absatzmöglichkeiten eröffnen und damit echte Wahlfreiheit
ermöglichen.
Monsanto bietet daher
interessierten Landwirten, die im nächsten Jahr Bt-Mais
einsetzen wollen, Unterstützung bei der Anbauplanung an.
Monsanto ist ein
international tätiges Unternehmen für Agrarprodukte mit
Firmensitz in St. Louis im US-Bundesstaat Missouri. Das
Unternehmen ist einer der Weltmarktführer in der Entwicklung und
Herstellung von umweltverträglichen Pflanzenschutzmitteln sowie
von mit Hilfe moderner Biotechnologie verbessertem Saatgut.
Monsanto
Germany welcomes results of GM corn test
cultivation in Saxony-Anhalt: starting shot has sounded for
commercial cultivation of GM corn in 2005
Monsanto welcomes the results of the test cultivation with
genetically modified corn, which was presented today at a press
conference called by the Federal Land of Saxony-Anhalt and the
association InnoPlanta e.V.
Monsanto supplied the seed for the test
cultivation; implemented in the spring of 2004, of the
pest-resistant corn line MON810.
It became apparent that in Germany as well, it
is feasible to ensure the co-existence of genetically modified
and conventional varieties of corn, using simple and practical
means. The concerns voiced from certain quarters with regard to
possible negative impacts arising from the cultivation of
genetically modified corn have proved to be unfounded.
The formation of a liability fund, which had
been demanded by some parties, for purported economic effects
that the cultivation of approved varieties may have, has been
shown to be superfluous. Instead, intelligent solutions are what
is called for now, solutions that include all of the links in
the market chain, that open up fair sales opportunities to
farmers, and that enable a real choice.
Monsanto will now offer its support to farmers
interested in planting Bt corn next year.
BACKGROUNDER (MS Word document)
Insights gained from the 2004 Test Crop Coexistence of
Genetically Modified and Conventional Corn.
Copyright 2004
Monsanto Germany
RELATED
INFORMATION
Source: The Scientist
By
Ned Stafford
German GM study
complete
Study organizers say the results show that GM corn fields can
'co-exist' with non-GM crops
The organizers of a research
project in which German fields were planted with genetically
modified (GM) corn said today (November 24) that the test
results prove that GM corn fields can "co-exist" with
neighboring non-GM fields.
The announcement was made at a
Berlin press conference just days before Germany's Bundestag, or
lower house of Parliament, is expected to give final approval to
a new law that would
strictly regulate GM crops. Opponents of the law say it will
stifle innovation and most likely trigger an exodus of GM
research from Germany.
The tests, in 28 GM corn fields
surrounded by non-GM fields in seven states, have been a
magnet for controversy in Germany, whose environmentally
friendly Greens Party is a junior coalition partner of
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's ruling SPD party. Test field
locations were kept secret to prevent their destruction by
anti-GM crop activists.
Speaking to The Scientist
after the press conference,
W. Eberhard Weber, leader of the research team, said his
study, which measured GM contamination in corn harvested from
surrounding non GM fields, shows that non-GM corn planted at
least 20 meters from GM corn was not contaminated above the
EU-allowed limit of 0.9%. According to EU regulations, corn with
a GM level above 0.9% cannot be labeled as non-GM.
"There is no doubt that if you
keep a certain distance, then co-existence between GM and non GM
fields is possible," said Weber, who is head of the Department
of Plant Breeding and Plant Protection at
Martin-Luther-University at Halle-Wittenberg. "And that 'certain
distance' not less than 20 meters."
Christoph Then, a Greenpeace
Germany GM expert who heard Weber speak at the press conference,
told The Scientist the study results appeared to be
accurate.
"But the conclusion that you
have no problem if you put non GM crops 20 meters away from GM
crops, this conclusion is wrong," Then said.
Then insisted that the 0.9%
contamination threshold mandated by the European Union is
irrelevant, because many German corn processors and millers will
not accept corn with GM contamination above 0.2% to 0.4%.
Weber defended his conclusion,
saying the data are accurate and that it also was correct to use
the European Union's benchmark for GM contamination. As for the
issue of acceptable levels for the food industry, he said: "That
is an issue that can be discussed in the future and a solution
found."
The research project was
coordinated by
InnoPlanta in Gatersleben and the
Bundesverband Deutscher Pflanzenzuechter (Federal
Association of German Plant Breeders), with participation from
private farmers and state agricultural institutes in Bavaria and
Saxony-Anhalt, according to InnoPlanta. The German Research
Ministry and several state ministries provided financing.
Plant breeding companies
Pioneer Hi-Bred Northern Europe, Monsanto Agar Deutschland GmbH,
and KWS SAAT AG provided seeds and co-funding for corollary
scientific work. Additional support in communications or
financing came from Bayer CropScience, BASF Plant Science,
Syngenta, and Deutsche Industrievereinigung Biotechnologie (DIB,
German Association of Biotechnology Industries).
Supporters of GM crops used the
test results as a springboard to publicize their views. Shortly
after the press conference, Monsanto Agrar Deutschland issued a
statement saying the test results supported Monsanto's
opposition to a proposed liability fund that would be used to
compensate non-GM farmers whose crops are contaminated from GM
crops. Under the new law set to be approved later this week,
planters of GM crops who are found to have contaminated adjacent
non-GM fields can be held liable for damages even if they
followed planting instructions and other regulations.
Helmut Heiderich, bio and
genetic engineering expert in Parliament for the opposition
CDU/CSU coalition, issued a statement saying the test results
prove that GM crops can co-exist with non-GM crops without
causing damage. He called on German Agriculture Minister Renate
Künast, a prime backer of the new GM crop law, to accept the
results and to quit trying to spread unease in the general
German population about the danger of GM crops.
|