Worthington, Minnesota
November 1, 2004
By Lizabeth Stahl,
University of Minnesota
Extension Service
Extension Regional Center, Worthington
What
factors should you consider when selecting next year’s corn
hybrids?
Regardless of
the current focus on technology traits, yield potential should
still be the number one consideration in hybrid selection.
Hybrid performance and reliability are driven by the hybrid’s
genetic package so be sure you are starting with a base that
meets your needs. Technology traits can’t add bushels to a
hybrid’s yield potential - they can only help protect it.
When looking
at the different technologies available, ask yourself if you
need Bt seed for corn borer and/or corn rootworm control. Have
you seen root lodging or other evidence of insect pressure in
your fields? Have you tried a side by side comparison to see if
there might be pressure you didn’t realize existed? Compare the
benefits, such as not having to deal with insecticides at
planting time, to the added seed costs. If you need insect
control, cost of insecticide and application may be equal to or
greater than the extra seed cost, so production cost may not go
up when buying Bt. Also look at the range of insects the trait
has resistance to since not all traits are created equal. You
may purchase seed with technology traits for “insurance”, but be
sure to weigh the price of that insurance to your benefits.
If you are
considering a herbicide tolerant hybrid, will a Roundup or
Liberty herbicide program best address your weed control needs?
Compare the
entire seed and herbicide program costs of a conventional
program to a herbicide tolerant program. If you are using
Roundup Ready soybeans, are you concerned about the potential
development of herbicide resistance in your field or shifts to
more Roundup-tolerant weeds that could occur over time with
continuous use of Roundup?
Other
important considerations in hybrid selection include maturity,
moisture, agronomic traits (i.e. standability, disease
tolerance, test weight, etc.), and price. As drying costs add up
this year, you may be tempted to forgo full-season hybrids next
year. Keep in mind we experienced one of the coldest growing
seasons from May to August on record this year, which
significantly delayed crop development. Although you may plan to
adjust the percent of full-season hybrids planted, full-season
hybrids adapted to your area will typically yield the best and
generate the most profits. Harvest moistures have been running
about 5 to 6 percentage points above five year averages this
year. It is hard to predict what will happen with LP gas prices
next year, but drying costs should be much lower if harvest
moistures are more “normal” next year.
Is it
sufficient to use data from your own farm when selecting hybrids
for next year?
Dale Hicks,
Extension Corn Specialist with the University of Minnesota ,
evaluated seven years of corn hybrid test results from the
University of Wisconsin to help answer this question. Top
yielding hybrids from each year at one, two, or three locations
were grown at all three locations in replicated trials the
following year. Results from this study showed that yields the
following year were higher if hybrids were chosen from multiple
location averages rather than the single location averages.
Average performance also decreased if more than three hybrids
were grown the following year. This study demonstrates that the
best hybrid decisions are based on results from several
locations rather than just your own farm or a location near your
farm. This study also suggests that average performance
decreases when more than three hybrids from a maturity group are
grown.
Hybrid
selection is one of the most important decisions you will make
for next year’s growing season. There are many factors to
consider in hybrid selection but time invested in this decision
can help optimize profits next year.
Source:
http://www.extension.umn.edu/cropenews/2004/04MNCN36.htm
|